Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil producers shun dollar
FT ^ | December 10, 2006 | Haig Simonian, Javier Blas, Carola Hoyos

Posted on 12/11/2006 5:20:09 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

Oil producers shun dollar

By Haig Simonian in Zurich and Javier Blas and Carola Hoyos in London

Published: December 10 2006

Oil producing countries have reduced their exposure to the dollar to the lowest level in two years and shifted oil income into euros, yen and sterling, according to new data from the Bank for International Settlements.

The revelation in the latest BIS quarterly review, published on Monday, confirms market speculation about a move out of dollars and could put new pressure on the ailing US currency.

Market liquidity is traditionally low in December, and many traders have locked in profits, potentially reinforcing volatility.

Russia and the members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, the oil cartel, cut their dollar holdings from 67 per cent in the first quarter to 65 per cent in the second.

Meanwhile, they increased their holdings of euros from 20 to 22 per cent, the BIS said. The speed of the shift may help to explain the weakness of the dollar, which recently fell to a 20-month low against the euro and a 14-year low against sterling.

The BIS, the central bank for the developed world’s central banks, is customarily cautious in its language. However, it noted: “While the data are not comprehensive, they do appear to indicate a modest shift over the quarter in the US dollar share of reporting banks’ liabilities to oil exporting countries.”

The review shows that Qatar and Iran, whose foreign exchange policy has sparked widespread market speculation, cut their dollar holdings by $2.4bn and $4bn respectively.

Such shifts may be modest compared with the total assets held, but they provide a crucial indication on future thinking.

Currency switches are likely to be progressive, subtle and discreet, as untoward attention could hit the dollar, lowering the value of depositors’ remaining dollar-denominated assets.

The last time oil-exporting countries cut their exposure to the dollar – in late 2003 – it pushed the euro to an all-time high against the dollar. Eighteen months ago, the exposure to the dollar of oil producing countries was above 70 per cent.

BIS data is the best guide financial markets have to the currency investment trends of oil producers, which otherwise do not provide figures. The rise in oil prices since 2002 means oil producing countries have amassed a current account surplus of about $500bn, according to the IMF. This is 2½ times the current account surplus of China.

Overall, Opec’s dollar deposits fell by $5.3bn, while euro and yen-denominated deposits rose $2.8bn and $3.8bn, respectively. Placements of dollars by Russians rose by $5bn, but most of their $16bn additional deposits were denominated in euros.

The dollar has suffered weakness because of concerns about global imbalances and the future course of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policy.

Additional reporting by Peter Garnham in London


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budgetdeficit; dollardepreciation; goldbugs; skyisfalling; trade; tradedeficit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2006 5:20:10 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: expat_panama; ex-Texan; Pelham; winodog; durasell; RobRoy; simon says what; GSlob; headsonpikes; ...

This post is for all those who seem to think the budget deficit and trade/current account deficit doesn't matter.


2 posted on 12/11/2006 5:25:17 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Russia and the members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, the oil cartel, cut their dollar holdings from 67 per cent in the first quarter to 65 per cent in the second.

I guess shunning must be some form of 'newspeak' that resembles hedging.
3 posted on 12/11/2006 5:25:41 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

You are right. Hedging for now. But down the road, unless we fix our massive deficits, it could turn into a full-fledged route.


4 posted on 12/11/2006 5:27:20 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

That's terrible, why do I care?


5 posted on 12/11/2006 5:28:08 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

When the value of the dollar goes down, everything costs more.


6 posted on 12/11/2006 5:35:36 PM PST by prov1813man (While the one you despise and ridicule works to protect you, those you embrace work to destroy you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: prov1813man

So, is that bad?


7 posted on 12/11/2006 5:37:16 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The depreciation of the dollar actually lowers our deficit in 'real value' comparatively. If someone owed you ten dollars ten years ago it would be worth more then (ten years ago) in real value due to inflation for instance. I don't approve of this numbers game BTW but it happens to be true.

The Euro's appreciation (dollars depreciation) has lowered any debt incurred at the beginning (strong dollar portion) of the cycle by a proportionate amount. A lower dollar also increases American manufacturer's competitiveness globally on average. It's kind of a double edged sword and historically speaking the Euro is too young of a currency to say whether this is normal or not.

8 posted on 12/11/2006 5:38:17 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
You are right. Hedging for now. But down the road, unless we fix our massive deficits, ...

funny, a lower dollar is perfect for that.

9 posted on 12/11/2006 5:39:40 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (* nuke * the * jihad *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
So, is that bad?

Yes.

10 posted on 12/11/2006 5:40:06 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Why?


11 posted on 12/11/2006 5:40:51 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

How about cutting government spending instead? The last thing we need is for all those international US dollars to come marching home.


12 posted on 12/11/2006 5:40:59 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
...it could turn into a full-fledged route.

Maybe even a rout!

13 posted on 12/11/2006 5:41:35 PM PST by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prov1813man

Not to mention what will happen if all those dollars come marching home.


14 posted on 12/11/2006 5:41:42 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
It's kind of a double edged sword and historically speaking the Euro is too young of a currency to say whether this is normal or not.

Right. However, europe has been around plenty long enough to judge its relative value as an engine of economic growth. It has none.

Europe is monetizing its dollar denominated assets. Brilliant scheme. It will be countered.

15 posted on 12/11/2006 5:42:00 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (* nuke * the * jihad *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The last thing we need is for all those international US dollars to come marching home.

I thought the current account deficit was bad? You said so yourself.

16 posted on 12/11/2006 5:42:13 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Maybe he meant a NAFTA highway, losing our sovereignty route?


17 posted on 12/11/2006 5:43:06 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Remember the old prayer: "The strength to change what I could, the fortitude to endure what I have to, and the wisdom to distingush between the two?" Ditto here. Not much one could do about it, besides piling into Janus Overseas mutual fund [TM]. Up 45%YTD.


18 posted on 12/11/2006 5:44:50 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
I wouldn't be surprised to see a few countries opt out of the Euro in the next decade or so.
19 posted on 12/11/2006 5:45:27 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
The problem is, by shifting our debt burden to the world, we are screwing our trading partners and threatening the status of the USD as the world's reserve currency. We receive innumerable benefits from this privilege. And if the world turns its back on the greenback, they will have no choice but to dump their worthless dollars into US assets, which will cause domestic prices to skyrocket.
20 posted on 12/11/2006 5:46:26 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson