Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Slammed as Border Patrol Agents Begin Prison Terms
CNSNews ^ | January 17, 2007 | Randy Hall

Posted on 01/17/2007 4:24:55 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-296 next last
To: Pukin Dog

"The way this forum has decided to attack the President is a disgrace. He is the one honorable man out there, trying to do the right thing."

Bush is a huge disgrace when it comes to border security. Bush doesn't even seem to think illegal immigration is a problem. I'm not going to support a man who is so irresponsible when comes to the most serious problem facing this nation.

Anyone who supports Bush on immigration is as worthless as him. Many of you either can't find any fault with Bush no matter what or you personally benefit from the destruction of this nation through illegal immigration. I agree with Bush on several issues but he's just a worthless loser when it comes to the most dangerous issue facing this nation.


61 posted on 01/17/2007 5:54:53 PM PST by ThermoNuclearWarrior (PRESSURE BUSH TO CLOSE THE BORDERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RJL

The trial is over and they were convicted, I take the law and order side on this.

Feel free to post their defense, frankly I would like to see their testimony.


62 posted on 01/17/2007 5:57:06 PM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Rohrabacher said Bush "obviously thinks more about his agreements with Mexico than the lives of American people and backing up his defenders."

Duh.

63 posted on 01/17/2007 5:58:12 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseyT

Hey, he's just trying. to feed his family


64 posted on 01/17/2007 6:00:01 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (Texas Cowboy...graduated to Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

You can't expect to have logical discussions with people who think it is perfectly OK for law enforcement officers to act like Uncle Fester.


65 posted on 01/17/2007 6:03:14 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
You botched your link by leaving out the http:// part. Here it is right.

fullyinformedjuries

66 posted on 01/17/2007 6:06:19 PM PST by Jason_b (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198&q=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
By your logic, if I know of someone who has committed a crime, or not defended against a crime, it should give me license to do the same?

Read again, I asked if the govenment was above the law, I didn't advocate breaking the law, and a pardon for these two agents would be within the law.

Most every FReeper is for following the law, that's what's so maddening.

While Bush and the federal government have ignored and continue to actively ignore the laws regarding illegals and enforcing the borders, they used every power of government to persecute these two agents who were trying to enforce the laws.

67 posted on 01/17/2007 6:13:05 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: pointsal

HOLD IT FOLKS.... these two fellas were doing their job...


Got that right,,,The Agent fired after the scumbag shot at him.And the Agent lit the dude up enough that he landed in Mexico..He should have killed the scum (who might have been bringing reefer to your kids)and got it over with...And that ain't no Opinion.


68 posted on 01/17/2007 6:18:12 PM PST by silentreignofheroes (When the Last Two Prophets are taken there will be no Tommorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
We are losing our souls, I tell you.

If this was over lets say two cops in anytown USA and they shot like this I would say hang E'm. But that wasn't Anytown USA and those BP's are in an undeclared war zone of which our leaders in Washington DC have turned a blind eye to. It is the Mexican Smugglers against the US BP it is the Mexican Army as well as Mexican Police against our BP. Then besides that they face the often armed illegals with nothing to loose. Night after night day after day while our POTUS kisses up to the Mexican government BACKING the ones shooting at our BP's for his beloved new trade union.

What is worse the government thinks that their bad cutting a deal by pardoning a felon with 700 pounds of pot is a far less serious a crime as being shot in the butt? This man has had how many arrest by BP? The USAG's ofice is ready to give him sainthood.

How many BP's have been shot at and killed by Mexicans and what has been Mexico's response? What has been the Whitehouses demands? It's a war zone down there. Maybe not one declared by congress but these guys stand a far better chance of not coming home than most cops in the nation. Fire them? OK. But this is a move to bring down the morale of the BP as a whole. Make them second guess all moves. Be much more reluctant to be as aggressive as they need to be to do the job. I will no more second guess them under their circumstances than a U.S. service members actions in Iraq.

But the real giveaway our BP's were sold out? here it is. Unarmed National Guards on the border that the BP as well must protect. Thank you for absolutely nothing GW Bush. Bush has helped create the very conditions that place our BP's lives in danger to start with. In light of his gross mis-management concerning our borders yes he owes them a pardon and the rest of the BP and the NG's he sent there unarmed an apology as well.

69 posted on 01/17/2007 6:19:45 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: babygene

"Cops shoot people in the back all the time who are running away, and they are never prosecuted for it."

You don't know what you are talking about.


70 posted on 01/17/2007 6:22:59 PM PST by lawdude (2006: The elections we will live to die for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RJL
While Bush and the federal government have ignored and continue to actively ignore the laws regarding illegals and enforcing the borders, they used every power of government to persecute these two agents who were trying to enforce the laws.

Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU.

71 posted on 01/17/2007 6:24:42 PM PST by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
The government has failed at the border for 40 years, but now that it is a political issue, Bush is supposed to fix it all by himself?

It's become a political issue on Bush's watch, who else would we ask to fix it? As Bush continues to refuse to enforce the law and borders he deserves strong criticism.

I also blame Bush's lack of a winning plan on illegal immigration for the defeat of the Republican Congress.

Two years ago even Senator Frist was saying secure the borders first. If, at that time Bush had worked with fellow Republicans and truly secured the border, he could have come back to a Republican congress a year or two later and asked for a guest worker plan, they would have gladly passed that.

Then Bush could have sailed into the past elections with his fellow Republicans happy with a secure border and Hispanics happy with a guest worker plan, a win-win deal.

But no, Bush went with the lose-lose plan, where he angered his base voters and angered the Hispanics, who then went 70%~76% for Democrats. Fellow Republicans paid the price for his short sightedness.

72 posted on 01/17/2007 6:25:44 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Me, too. Wish someone had cloned him.


73 posted on 01/17/2007 6:31:32 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Bush's, Reagan's and everyone else's mistakes at the border are no excuse for law-breaking. If Bush's border blundering were the issue, I would address it, but its not, no matter how much my Congressmen would like to make it so.

When these men were tried, the only evidence allowed in, pertained to their guilt or innocence.

Stripping everything else out, they are guilty. There are no mitigating circumstances, they are guilty. Any other argument is just like what the Libs do. Was Clinton guilty? They said it was just about sex, remember? Is Sandy Burger guilty? Libs said he just used 'poor judgment', remember? The Rich pardon in exchange for money for Clinton's library? When does it end? If we start excusing people based on mitigating circumstances, we are no better than our enemies on the left.

74 posted on 01/17/2007 6:31:47 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

BECAUSE THE PUNISHMENT ALL THINGS CONSIDERED DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME. THEY LET A MAJOR DOPE SMUGLER GO SCOTT FREE OVER A SHOT IN THE SEATER.


75 posted on 01/17/2007 6:45:36 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Congress wrote the sentencing guidelines.
76 posted on 01/17/2007 6:47:31 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
Say speaking of cheap, you still using those illegals on your projects?

*snicker*

77 posted on 01/17/2007 7:00:32 PM PST by processing please hold (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

LOL, that explains it all then.


78 posted on 01/17/2007 7:03:18 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: silentreignofheroes
Shot at them?

Can you point to the exidence that says that occured...other than the testimony of two cops?

And...we all know people have been known to lie when they fannies are on the line. Gee...cops never lie.

So...where is the OTHER evidence? They didn't take cover...they didn't arrest him...they just left.

That doesn't sound like the actions of people who just got fired upon....sound like the actions of someone who was firing at an illegal...scaring them back to Mexico and then leaving the sceen.

79 posted on 01/17/2007 7:09:59 PM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Personally, my preference would be using them for sniper practice....but that's politically incorrect to the nth.


80 posted on 01/17/2007 7:28:24 PM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson