Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian President says "wise" Americans will bar any attack (Barf Alert)
Yahoo News ^

Posted on 01/23/2007 8:38:55 PM PST by Soothesayer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: bushfamfan
he probably fantasizes about what Hillery would look like in a burka.
21 posted on 01/23/2007 9:26:55 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Lady Jag; Liz


Hanging Saddam Hussein made a huge impression on Almondjoy

The one who lost his head must have given them chuckles too

Japan needed a 2nd nuke to get religion

Iran is no WWII Japan




22 posted on 01/23/2007 9:30:37 PM PST by devolve ( ........"refresh" my (updated) graphics posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan

If this nut is talking about Jay Rockefeller he might want to find what the meaning of wise IS.


23 posted on 01/23/2007 9:31:41 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Frwy

If we hit Iran Iran would send troops enmasse into Iraq to confront American forces. We could be surrounded if mookie covers their back. Many casulties. Don't know if we have sufficient forces and supply to sustain a full scale military attack by Iran

But then again a well placed nuke could end it all.

I say take em down while we have the edge in the nuke dept..


24 posted on 01/23/2007 9:32:04 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
"He probably fantasizes about what Hillery would look like in a burka."

I wish she would wear a burka and put a cork in her mouth. That would make me happy.

25 posted on 01/23/2007 9:32:58 PM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

if we are so 'wise' why did he just say he is about to destroy us along with israel. what a crock


26 posted on 01/23/2007 9:33:22 PM PST by irishfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Lady Jag; Liz

27 posted on 01/23/2007 9:34:56 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; devolve; ntnychik

28 posted on 01/23/2007 9:35:59 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Missouri Ozarks?


29 posted on 01/23/2007 9:37:29 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

close enough!


30 posted on 01/23/2007 9:50:28 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Time's a wasting. No time like the present. Better late (now) than never. Make hay while the sunshines. If we aren't prepared, we need to get prepared so we an Be Prepared. Like yesterday.


31 posted on 01/23/2007 9:50:34 PM PST by Frwy (Eternity without Jesus is a hell-of-a long time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Frwy

could be the 20,000 troops with new supplies and another carrier group might make Iran sweat more than jimmy carter on the peanut plantation.


32 posted on 01/23/2007 9:55:11 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Frwy

failure to act now only gives them greater advantage


33 posted on 01/23/2007 9:56:02 PM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer
For a contrary position one of the GOP wannabees just gave a speech, at an international conference in Israel, outlining his thoughts on dealing with Iran. Those here trying to pick a primary candidate who either want someone they agree with on a variety of issues, or who are single issue on this issue may be interested. No transcript available, just a 20 minute audio at this time. Suitable for background noise while surfing the web.

Yes, they are all politicians and as such can only be given limited trust and even then, as Reagan said, "Trust but verify." I consider three things when evaluating a political speech. First, the text: if they say what you want they still might not do it, but if they don't say what you want they hardly ever do what you want. Second, who and what do they cite in support of their positions? You may not yet know much about some candidates, but their sources may be well known to you and verifiable. If their sources generally lean in one direction the candidate likely leans similarly. Third, consider their delivery. Recent history shows that Bush's greatest weakness, with the possible exception of his compassion toward liberals, is his Achilles mouth. The new media may be growing, but we still need a good communicator to get our message past the MSM blockade. Is the candidate up to the task?

As an Iowan I have to choose early and I haven't decided yet. I know enough to rule some out of anything short of a desperate nose holding vote. I'm still researching others, trying to verify their trustworthiness. The campaign is afoot, as shown by some strident posts at this board of late. Doubtless some such posts are correct; many Freepers are reliable sources. However, methinks some doth protest too much. Decide for yourself. Check out the Romney link about if you are interested.

34 posted on 01/23/2007 9:56:15 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carola

Notice he used the word wise americans I don't think he was talking about the democrats.Then again you may be right.


35 posted on 01/23/2007 10:00:41 PM PST by MATSEVAH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
We could be surrounded if mookie covers their back. Many casulties. Don't know if we have sufficient forces and supply to sustain a full scale military attack by Iran.

Please, if this would actually turn into a conventional war we would wipe the map with Iranian casualties. We have more than enough troops to destroy the best Iran could throw at us if we had to the gloves off to blow everything up in sight.

Our air assets alone would decimate Iranian armor. A couple of MOABs would crush Iranian morale and mookies boys would be little more than gnats to swipe out of the way.

We have a 130,000 of the best equipped and trained soldiers in the world there backed with air and sea assets. None of our enemies really has an inkling how much firepower we could wield with that strength. If we had to fight an unrestricted conventional battle the world would really see how destructive shock and awe is.

36 posted on 01/23/2007 10:27:39 PM PST by A message (We who care, Can Not Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

Two good posts there, potlatch!


37 posted on 01/23/2007 10:36:29 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: A message

Hey I believe in our troops and their capability. I am also realsitic in knowing that Since 1991, Iran has been able to re-arm and rebuild its military after 10 years of war with Iraq. They have a lot of good stuff, a lot of soviet and chinese arms. Migs and other fighter planes.
We have good stuff too. I am just saying that a lot of good soldiers will die. When the body bags start piling up our surrender monkeys will go hysterical bannanas. They are freaking over 3000 casulties over 4 years.

Dont get me wrong. I want to take out Iran. But not with conventional forces. Nukes. Not as messy. Nukes save Americans. Just like they did when we bombed Japan.


38 posted on 01/23/2007 10:37:42 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

Thank you nit!!


39 posted on 01/23/2007 10:40:23 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

My home is in SEMO.


40 posted on 01/23/2007 10:57:56 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson