Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A fair way to shrink the wealth gap
Christian Science Monitor ^ | January 24, 2007 | Editorial

Posted on 01/24/2007 1:59:36 PM PST by Graybeard58

Bloated CEO salaries – subsidized by taxpayers – undermine American values. Congress needs to reform the tax code.

The new Democratic-led Congress has already made great strides on its ambitious legislative agenda. From hiking the minimum wage to cutting interest rates on student loans, Democrats have won impressive bipartisan support for their legislative goals.

Not included on the agenda, however, is any proposal designed to address what may be the most fundamental problem facing America right now: an alarmingly high degree of inequality.

Currently the top 10 percent of income earners in the US own 70 percent of the wealth, and the wealthiest 5 percent own more than the bottom 95 percent, according to a Federal Reserve Study. The ratio of average CEO pay to worker pay in the US shot up from a mere 301-to-1 in 2003 to 431-to-1 in 2004. The average CEO now earns $11.8 million per year, versus the paltry $27,460 for the average worker. As America tries to grapple with soaring healthcare costs and lack of universal coverage, UnitedHealth Group CEO William McGuire received an obscene $124.8 million in compensation in 2005. He's just one of many grossly overcompensated kingpins of the US economy.

Adding insult to injury, taxpayers actually subsidize these bloated CEO salaries. The federal government gives tax breaks to corporations for those salaries, to the tune of hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars.

We used to call this by another name: the Gilded Age.

Income disparity hurts democracy

The level of inequality and unfairness has risen to such eye-popping levels that it is attracting attention from unlikely sources. Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Board chair, has called rising inequality "a concern in the American economy." Mr. Bernanke's esteemed predecessor, Alan Greenspan, has said that disparate income distribution is "not helpful for

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: FreedomCalls
It is always the "evil corporations" (i.e., more Marxist language) who are getting too much money, doing something bad, etc. As you point out, athletes and actors are making a ton more than they used to make too, but you don't see these Leftist authors making a bid deal out of that inconvenient fact.
61 posted on 01/24/2007 3:12:45 PM PST by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58



The Top 50% pay 96.54% of All Income Taxes
The Top 1% Pay More Than a Third: 34.27%

• Jan. 8, 2007: The NY Times Admits It's the Truth



62 posted on 01/24/2007 3:21:18 PM PST by LC HOGHEAD ("We are going to take things away from you for the common good" Hillary Clinton,Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
A fair way to shrink the wealth gap

How about education institutes actually TEACHING people marketable skills so that they can go sell their skills and knowledge on the open economy?

How about people stop whining about what someone else has and actually WORKING to try to earn at least as much!!

How about kids face up to reality that they ALL won't be rock stars or professional athletes??

These are just for starters, add your own!!

63 posted on 01/24/2007 3:22:00 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

Where is the inefficiency in CEO pay? Maybe they deserve it ... Or should Steve Joobs take apay cut?


Obviouosly, some CEOs who actually harm a company would be overpaid at $1 per year. On the other hand a CEO who can manage in such a way that a company's short term and longterm profit is sufficiently higher to justify his pay could be worth any amount, unless someone else could do just as well and be willing to work for less.


64 posted on 01/24/2007 3:22:05 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Elpasser
And if a corporation's shareholders want to spend $X million to hire the best management talent, I should be concerned because ...?

You are subsidizing that $X million. Stop corporate welfare and this problem will go away.
.
65 posted on 01/24/2007 3:23:02 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
"1. All lawmakers cannot make more than 25 times the lowest paid voter."

25 times 0 is about right for most civil masters.
But how can we count the money they steal or are bribed?
66 posted on 01/24/2007 3:23:38 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

"You are subsidizing that $X million. Stop corporate welfare and this problem will go away."

WRONG! Taxpayers are not subsidizing anyone's compensation. That is misinformation in this article by an author who does not have a clue about basic tax law. Corporations are taxed on the profits that they get to keep. If a corporation passes part of the profit to employees as compensation, the corporation should rightly get a deduction for the compensation it paid to the employee because it did not get to KEEP that money. However, the employee pays the tax on the compensation so there is no tax avoidance or subsidy of any kind involved. Just more lies and nonsense from dumb Leftists.


67 posted on 01/24/2007 3:26:47 PM PST by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 91B
My wife and I together make about $100,000 a year which puts us within the top 10% of earners. But are we rich? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Yes you are. Americans forget how rich the country is. You must think you are "poor" if you have to watch a 29" standard def TV instead of a 50" HD plasma.

68 posted on 01/24/2007 3:28:56 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
There is no division or distribution of income in this country. - yet.

Wealth is obtained in only two ways. - It is earned or it is inherited. This article is obscene.
69 posted on 01/24/2007 3:31:39 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
"Yes you are. Americans forget how rich the country is. You must think you are "poor" if you have to watch a 29" standard def TV instead of a 50" HD plasma."

Relative to other countries, yes, but not rich in the sense that this guy is some evil person that the democrats should punish with highly progressive, punitive, Marxist redistributive tax rates.

Everyone in this country, including our poor, is rich compared to a lot of countries, thanks to our free market capitalism.
70 posted on 01/24/2007 3:32:39 PM PST by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
The legal construct of corporation is to serve the common public interest

LOL! If you really believe what you just wrote, then you are a very uninformed American.

The purpose of every corporation that I ever owned was to generate personal wealth for myself and my family.

And that is the sine quo non of free market capitalism.

71 posted on 01/24/2007 3:36:15 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

It amazes me how misinformed and ignorant people are about our free market economy and basic economics. I read some really silly things on this board. It is sad really.

Those are the same people who will read an article like the one by this author and not see that he is clueless and completely wrong about everything he wrote.


72 posted on 01/24/2007 3:38:24 PM PST by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
The only fair way to shrink the wealth gap?

Work harder.

73 posted on 01/24/2007 3:39:19 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

This thread needs a Barf Alert in the title line.


74 posted on 01/24/2007 3:42:58 PM PST by wjcsux (There is no end to the good, that do-gooders will do, with other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux

"This thread needs a Barf Alert in the title line."

Big time!


75 posted on 01/24/2007 3:45:09 PM PST by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Hendrix
Boy, do you have that right. 8^)

But here is an interesting quote from one of my favorite Americans who had a word to say on the subject:

Big jobs usually go to the men who prove their ability to outgrow small ones.
- Theodore Roosevelt

76 posted on 01/24/2007 3:45:54 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: randog
>> Currently the top 10 percent of income earners in the US own 70 percent of the wealth...
>>Funny, various government agencies--local, county, state, and federal--own an awful lot of land and property in my area.

That's one of the funny thing, isn't it? How it doesn't count as wealth once it's in government hands... I suppose those with the communist leanings are right then, that when government owns everything then no one owns more than anyone else.
77 posted on 01/24/2007 3:46:06 PM PST by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

A. Pole is correct. That is the history of U.S. corporations and the reason they are chartered by government. What they are in fact is another matter.


78 posted on 01/24/2007 3:48:53 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

bump for later


79 posted on 01/24/2007 3:49:31 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Marxachusetts rag. 'Nuff said.


80 posted on 01/24/2007 3:52:17 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson