Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Habitat for Humanity faces fight in wealthy community
SF Gate ^ | January 25, 2007 | Peter Fimrite

Posted on 01/28/2007 1:45:48 AM PST by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: eastcobb

"Truth be told, Habitat For Humanity shouldn't try to build in million dollar neighborhoods."

Why not? /s

All the HFH resident has to do is move in, stay a while then sell for a tidy profit, since the area is so desirable. It has the appearance of charity housing program but turns into a charity investment program.


41 posted on 01/28/2007 6:24:17 AM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Reading the posts here, it seems that most are unfamiliar with HFH-- I am shocked by the assumptions some posters make. It IS NOT government subsidized, and the residents are obligated to pay the mortgage in full just like anyone else. They get great deals, because labor is provided by volunteers and materials are obtained at great discounts by generous people. HFH does a throrough screening of applicants, and selects those who hold a job responsibly and are willing to undergo training for understanding how to manage their finances. HFH has an unbelivably low default rate (two defaults in the hundreds of thousands of mortgages they have put up around the globe over a twenty-year+ history). Most of the groups funding comes from Christian churches, and the folks who move into the houses are wonderful, greateful people-- typically young families.


42 posted on 01/28/2007 10:02:11 AM PST by LambSlave (If you have to ask permission, it is not a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

"If suburbanites don't want these things, they need to be supportive of a reasonable amount of decent affordable housing in their areas as well."

Written like someone from S.E. DC....oh wait, make that Northwest D.C...


43 posted on 01/28/2007 10:11:28 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: eastcobb

Actually, Marin county, outside of the housing costs, is slightly cheaper than a lot of the Bay Area. So it's probably a good place to put indigent people that want to stay around SF.


44 posted on 01/28/2007 10:16:33 AM PST by zylphed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Let's create some jobs and housing for illegals up there so the residents can experience the benefits of diversity.


45 posted on 01/28/2007 10:30:59 AM PST by KittyKares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Here they are going into an enhanced neighborhood and blighting it

LOL...feel the love.

46 posted on 01/28/2007 10:32:36 AM PST by Wheee The People
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
So the issue remains: how do we break up the large, toxic concentrations of the very poor?

We don't - they do. It is an individual's responsibility to care for ones' self and ones' family. The primary reason that we have large toxic concentrations of "very poor" is that we, as a society, have chosen the socialist route of paying non-productive people rather than expecting them to earn their way through life. Precious few of those "very poor" are genuinely incapable of providing for themselves.

47 posted on 01/28/2007 10:42:21 AM PST by meyer (Bring back the Contract with America and you'll bring back the Republican majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
How much traffic & parking congestion could actually result from 4 homes?

There are a couple of known "sales" of H4H houses that went to crack dealers.

Perhaps they could specify to hold the crack, just provide cocaine, pot, oxycontin, Special K, Prince Valium, etc., and none of them other "street" drugs?

And maybe if any Kennedys are in the area, Ambien.

48 posted on 01/28/2007 10:51:10 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

LOL. Very funny


49 posted on 01/28/2007 12:18:37 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Proud_texan

More like a machete.


50 posted on 01/28/2007 1:14:48 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

You are correct in that. They already must be employed, have a good credit history (paying bills and utilities on time) and must be able to demonstrate their ability to pay the mortgage off. In addition, they have to agree to put in so many hours - typically 300-500 - of sweat equity in their own home.

Maybe it’s just in this area but I’ve seen some of the HFH homes around here and I’d rather have some of them as neighbors than the white-trash renters that lived next door to me for several years!


51 posted on 06/17/2007 6:00:49 PM PDT by ktscarlett66 (Face it girls....I'm older and I have more insurance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson