Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Never-seen battle in Indian skies (Mig-35 vs Super Hornet)
The Telegraph,India ^ | Monday, February 12, 2007 | ANIL BUDUR LULLA

Posted on 02/11/2007 11:06:41 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Never-seen battle in sky

ANIL BUDUR LULLA

The F/A-18 F Super Hornet and the MiG-35 Bangalore, Feb. 11: A brilliant blue-and-red streak in the sky, the MiG-35 climbs 90 degrees towards the sun, changes its mind and does a vertical U-turn, screaming 90 degrees towards earth. It’s still in one piece.

Moments later, the grey F/A-18 F Super Hornet shoots sunwards like a bullet after a short take-off, levels at 8,000 feet, floats, turns left, shows its dual engines just above the gaping audience, goes into attack mode and swivels — all in one smooth motion.

“It’s like nothing we’ve seen before,” says a defence ministry official who will sit in judgement with a clutch of pilots when the Indian Air Force decides on the aircraft it will settle for in its order of 126 multi-role combat fighters.

The twin-engined MiG-35 and Super Hornet are clearly in a different league. And on the evidence of the demonstrations in Yalahanka, erstwhile Cold War rivals Russia and the US are pulling out all stops.

Boeing’s Michael E. Rietz, the India programme manager for F/A-18F business, says the Hornet boasts of the latest radar. The Electronically Scanned Array (Aesa) radar is also used by the US Navy.

“This is the right aircraft for establishing air dominance. It does not require any platform to support it and carries missiles for its own protection,” he says.

More important, Boeing will let the planes be made under licence in India, a first for the F/A-18 programme.

Asked how the aircraft compares to the MiG-35, Rietz says: “Survivability is the key. While it is a lethal machine, we take pride in the Super Hornets, which avoid being seen, hit and killed.”

The biggest advantage is that the Hornet’s wings can be folded, enabling it to operate from aircraft carriers.

The Russians, on the other hand, are playing on a strong wicket. They never fail to emphasise their 44-year association with India. IAF pilots are familiar with the nuts and bolts of Russian systems.

The MiG-35 also has the Aesa radar specifically made for the Indian programme.

Referred to as the generation 4 ++ aircraft, MiG-35 versions on show here were arguably the most eye-catching.

The Russians rarely fail to advertise the MiG-35’s thrust vector control that allows the aircraft to undertake the breathtaking “cobra” manoeuvre. The aircraft stalls in mid-flight, nose at 90 degrees like a cobra ready to strike, and slides backwards. In a real dogfight, such a move can turn the hunted into the hunter.

Back to the Indian official who will be among those who sit in judgement. “I will not look at aerobatics alone,” he says. “I’ll look at what’s inside…. I will look at the price and I will look at history.”

“It’s probably comparable to buying onions and potatoes I tell my wife who is technologically challenged,” he adds. “But now we have more vendors to choose from.”


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: boeing; iaf; india; mig; navair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 02/11/2007 11:06:44 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Isn't the rap on the Super Hornet that it is somewhat underpowered?


2 posted on 02/11/2007 11:09:00 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I always enjoy watching airshow video of Russian aircraft. The crashes are spectacular!
3 posted on 02/11/2007 11:10:42 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
“It’s probably comparable to buying onions and potatoes I tell my wife who is technologically challenged,” he adds.

Ah, Spudnik revisited!

4 posted on 02/11/2007 11:10:55 PM PST by sourcery (Government Warning: The Attorney General has determined that Federal Regulation may be hazardous to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

You have to admit that they have prefected their ejection seats, or it might just be they have a lot of experience.


5 posted on 02/11/2007 11:26:20 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Support your local EOD Detachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

F/A-18 ping


6 posted on 02/11/2007 11:32:43 PM PST by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I don't think planes dogfight anymore?


7 posted on 02/11/2007 11:42:57 PM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
I don't think planes dogfight anymore?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1778903/posts=25#25

8 posted on 02/11/2007 11:57:30 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
I don't think planes dogfight anymore?

Oops! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1778903/posts?page=25#25

9 posted on 02/11/2007 11:59:00 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; blam; section9; Nick Danger; TigerLikesRooster
"More important, Boeing will let the planes be made under licence in India, a first for the F/A-18 programme."

That's a very, very aggressive sales pitch. Boeing may win after all.

Makes sense, really. UAV's, the F-22, and sub-orbital fighters are the future. Might as well sell the hell out of the F/A-18 while it still has value (e.g. over China/Pakistan).

Losing this sale will really piss off Putin, though.

However, it's hard to imagine that India would turn down having the plans, specs, and tech support for the F/A-18 and all of its components. Enormous technology transfer.

That's one heckofa sales pitch.

10 posted on 02/12/2007 12:07:18 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

"The Russians rarely fail to advertise the MiG-35’s thrust vector control that allows the aircraft to undertake the breathtaking “cobra” manoeuvre. The aircraft stalls in mid-flight, nose at 90 degrees like a cobra ready to strike, and slides backwards. In a real dogfight, such a move can turn the hunted into the hunter."


Just hit the brakes and they'll fly right on by.


11 posted on 02/12/2007 1:36:47 AM PST by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Yes & rather short legs for an aircraft of it's size.Though it's engines can be upgunned for greater thrust should the USN desire so.


12 posted on 02/12/2007 3:03:17 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack

I really don't think Boeing would be allowed offer the level of tech transfer you talk about for the simple fact that the aircraft will be built for the USN till after 2010 & operated much longer.Besides India & the US are still sending feelers to each other with ties at a delicate stage.

The Russians may allow greater tech transfer for the simple reason that MIG Corp is in the doldrums & the Mig-35 will not enter service with the Russian military anyway.


13 posted on 02/12/2007 3:06:38 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Still standing by the 50:50 split? BTW, while I knew that the Russians were working on an AESA, I didn't know that there was one working well enough for it to be offered in the MiG-35 (I knew it was to be part of the 35, but as a future add-on. From the article i get the feel that the 35 already has an AESA). What gives?

Finally, how long do you think this deal will be dragged on (I believe Indian military acquisition programs have a tendency to get ...well ....protracted). Will this be finished by 2010 or is that too soon?

14 posted on 02/12/2007 3:34:30 AM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Not a clue,though the RFPs will probably (have to) be issued by this year & selection within an year or so given the way the air force seems to be pushing for it with a rather unprecedented publicity drive about the airforce losing air superiority /dwindling squadron levels etc.

About a 50:50 split,no one knows though political compulsions may necessitate that though the recent proposals to buy more used Mirage-2000s & new SU-30s seem at odds with a 2 vendor possibility.


15 posted on 02/12/2007 4:09:03 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
FYI: "Dogfights" is on History channel all morning here.
16 posted on 02/12/2007 5:09:48 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"...Boeing will let the planes be made under license in India..."

Mistake #1. All of our defensive technology should be built right here in the good o'l USA. You and I know that some muslim will be working for the defense firm in India and will get a hold of the technology and supply it to Iran. We'll learn in a few years that Iran acquired secret code for the F18 and has developed a missile program that defeats the F18 defenses.
17 posted on 02/12/2007 5:16:07 AM PST by Arcy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arcy

Well if the US sticks to that line,they'd be shut out of the arms market in no time!!Anyway,license manufacturing is actually a monitored process where the company building it usually doesn't have source codes & other classified technology.

About license manufacturing & Muslims,well the only country building Abrams tanks under license is,...Egypt. & Turkey has also built the F-16 & has infact been successful in selling upgrade packages to F-16 users like Jordan & Pakistan.


18 posted on 02/12/2007 5:24:30 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Losing this sale will really piss off Putin, though.

So there is no downside.....
19 posted on 02/12/2007 5:28:59 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kozak; Southack

Crucial word is here "Losing".I won't discount the Mig-35's chances for one simple reason.If India buys this aircraft,it will (atleast temporarily) ground a joint Sino-Pak fighter aircraft project,the FC-1 which uses the RD-33 .If India buys 80 or so Mig-35s,Putin has no excuse to sell those engines.Pakistan or China will find it difficult to source & integrate a new engine for the type be it the US F-404 or F-414 or Euro-types.


20 posted on 02/12/2007 5:35:00 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson