Posted on 02/23/2007 5:22:11 PM PST by BlueJ7
Federal agents arrested Charles Rust-Tierney, the former president of the Virginia chapter of the ACLU, Friday in Arlington for allegedly possessing child pornography.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
freedom of speech !!! or whatever.
He better hope he's black, or alcoholic, or pretend one or the other.
Ruh-Roh!
And may I add, Doh!
go figure..
"Charles Rust-Tierney"
Always with the hyphens, these lefties.....
Did you accidentally miss the reference to his membership in the the ACLU? :) :)
Now his buddies at the ACLU can pursue his court case. The ACLU believes possession of child porn should not be a crime, as it's freedom of speech, freedom of expression, etc. They do say that they opposed the production of child porn because it's exploiting a minor to do so.
But mere possession is not a crime to them. See what happens to him in court.
Just looked and have seen no mention of this story yet by the DUmmies. Will be interesting to see how long they avoid it. LOL
The videos described in the complaint depict graphic forcible intercourse with prepubescent females. One if the girls is described in court documents as being "seen and heard crying", another is described as being "bound by rope."
Hang the SOB, did he ever once consider the rights of the little girls being raped? Did he ever once consider the hell those little girls were living in?
somehow, I'm just not surprised.
Just another typical leftist. They destroy children before they are born, in the name of "rights." Then, in the name of "rights," they destroy children after they are born. Another day, another leftist, another child victim.
Explains their defense of NAMBLA.
Same altar
This not suprising. I hope they fry the b'strd.
Statement by Charles Rust-Tierney to Loudoun County Library Board.
Re: Loudoun County Library Internet Filtering Policy.
Date: December 1, 1998.
Source: Charles Rust-Tierney. Rust-Tierney gave a photocopy of his prepared statement which he read at the hearing to Tech Law Journal. TLJ created this document by scanning the original and converting it to HTML.
STATEMENT OF THE ACLU OF VIRGINIA
TO THE LOUDOUN COUNTY LIBRARY BOARD
December 1, 1998
The ACLU of Virginia thanks the Loudoun County Library Board for this opportunity to speak to the Board and the public about Internet access In the Loudoun County libraries. Today more than ever, our nation's libraries are vibrant multi-cultural institutions that connect people in the smallest and most remote communities with global information resources. Thus, despite differences regarding appropriate means, we know that everyone in the room ultimately shares the same end goal: to provide an opportunity for all of the citizens of Loudoun County to benefit from the tremendous information resources available on the Internet.
As you know, Judge Brinkema of the Eastern District of Virginia has ruled that the current Loudoun County Internet Policy violates the First Amendment. Regardless of any future proceedings related to that litigation, the ACLU of Virginia urges the Board to carefully consider a new Internet Use Policy that allows for maximum Internet access while providing options to parents and other users who may be concerned about unwanted content.
The majority of libraries in Virginia and around the country offer access to the Internet without blocking software. As Judge Brinkema points out in her opinion, libraries that offer unfiltered access have had no significant problems. Three library directors in Virginia, including the Director of the Virginia Library Association, provided testimony in our case about their own positive experiences with full Internet access attached Declarations of Thomas Hehman, Bedford Public Library System; Salty Read, Norfolk Public Library, and Richard Murphy, Prince William Public Library Service. In addition, the judge mentioned several alternatives for dealing with unwanted content that are less restrictive than the current mandatory filtering policy, including the use of privacy screens, optional filtering on computers in the children's section, and educating patrons about Internet use. Finally, other libraries have adopted less restrictive policies that allow adult and minor patrons to decide for themselves whether to access the Internet with or without a filter. See attached letter from Kern County, California.
The ACLU urges the Board to apply the following important principles in crafting a now Internet Use Policy:
* Recognizing that individuals will continue to behave responsibly and appropriately while in the library, the default should be maximum, unrestricted access to the valuable resources of the Internet.
* The Internet is rapidly becoming an essential tool for learning and communication. Public libraries play a vital role in assuring that the Internet is universally available to all segments of the population on an equitable basis.
* Librarians can and should play a crucial role in educating all Internet users to engage in critical thinking skills when using the Internet, and to be careful about relying on inaccurate resources online.
* Libraries can develop lists of recommended online resources that they have reviewed and evaluated, to assist patrons in finding Internet sites that meet their interests.
* Parents should have primary responsibility for setting rules for their children regarding Internet access.
* Older minors should have access to resources appropriate for their age group, even if such materials may be considered by some parents to be unsuitable for younger minors.
America's libraries have always been the great equalizer, providing books and other information resources to help people of all ages and backgrounds live, learn, work and govern in a democratic society. The ACLU now urges the Board to adopt an Internet Use Policy that promotes the library's mission to expand universal access to information, and that recognizes the library's duty to uphold the First Amendment.
Another `pillar of the community' bites the dust.
And I hope the ACLUer bites it hard. Real hard.
No worries for him. He has the ACLU to back him up.
Is he a Dem? Give me a break he's an ACLU Chapter President. There is no way he's a Republican. If anything the Dems aren't liberal enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.