Skip to comments.
No deal, Rudy
Catholic Online ^
| 3/6/2007
Posted on 03/06/2007 5:39:37 PM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-554 next last
To: gotribe
Rudy doesn't need you So you support Hitlery KKKlinton for President?
More power to you I guess...
(And I thought I was posting on Free Republic...silly me)
21
posted on
03/06/2007 5:50:03 PM PST
by
markomalley
(Extra ecclesiam nulla salus CINO-RINO GRAZIE NO)
To: gotribe
Hillary is destroying Hillary. We dont need Rudy to beat Hillary.
Hillary is probably the most unelectable candidate on either side.
I dont know why we fear her
22
posted on
03/06/2007 5:50:18 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: markomalley
23
posted on
03/06/2007 5:50:27 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: markomalley
You will vote for the pro-abortion, anti-2nd amendment liberal, and like it, mister! After all, there is a little "r" after his name./sarc
24
posted on
03/06/2007 5:50:58 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: mylife
I perosonally feel that the abortion debate is a state matter
Uh oh, sounds like you don't fit into the right far right conservative Christian box the bots want to put you in. I feel the same way but consider myself to be a secure borders, fair trade, NASCAR dad type.
25
posted on
03/06/2007 5:51:17 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: Livin_large
I don't understand how a person can say they are going to protect the American public, by fighting terrorism, and then support the legal slaughter of the most innocent of Americans Add to that keeping the borders wide open, and it just completely baffles me.
26
posted on
03/06/2007 5:52:04 PM PST
by
abishai
To: gotribe
Hardly. Many, many, many catholics vote Dem across the ballot. Rudy doesn't need you, and he's going to destroy hitlery. Is that the sound of you taking your ball and going home?
27
posted on
03/06/2007 5:52:31 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
To: markomalley
Post #4 tells you exactly how the Rudybots respond to reasoned presentations like the one you posted. They taunt us, insisting that they can force a pro-abort, pro-gay social agenda on the rest of us by conjuring up memories of 9/11. Perhaps they're right, but I know that I won't help them. In fact, if Rudy gets the Republican nomination, I won't vote for any Republican who supports him--even the local dog catcher. I was a faithful Democrat once upon a time; I don't need to stay a Republican either.
28
posted on
03/06/2007 5:54:20 PM PST
by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: NapkinUser; Reagan Man; Fierce Allegiance; EternalVigilance; B Knotts; jmc813; Kimberly GG; Sun; ...
anti-abortion, anti-JulieAnnie ping!
29
posted on
03/06/2007 5:55:36 PM PST
by
FreeInWV
To: areafiftyone
Third Roman Catholics don't like to let the church (especially the Roman Catholic Church) decide for them who to vote for when it comes to politics. Understood. And there were quite a few people within the hierarchy of the Catholic Church over the last few decades who decided that they didn't want to impose any rigid morality on their parishioners, either.
The problem was that you never understood this was a two-way street . . . and we weren't supposed to impose OUR morality on THEM. Instead, we were supposed to look the other way while they allowed priests to violate our children in the sacristy, and shuffled these priests from one place to another to keep them out of trouble.
[I say this as a Catholic myself, just in case anyone wants to accuse me of launching an anti-Catholic rant here.]
30
posted on
03/06/2007 5:55:50 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: cripplecreek
I tend to not see things in extreme ways though I dont consider my self middle of the road at all.
I just thing there are some things you need to be solid on "constititional principals" and some things you need to be pragmatic on "social issues"
Bottom Line? Rudy doesnt fill the bill
31
posted on
03/06/2007 5:55:59 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: madprof98
Post #4 tells you exactly how the Rudybots respond to reasoned presentations like the one you posted. They taunt us, insisting that they can force a pro-abort, pro-gay social agenda on the rest of us by conjuring up memories of 9/11. Perhaps they're right, but I know that I won't help them. In fact, if Rudy gets the Republican nomination, I won't vote for any Republican who supports him--even the local dog catcher. I was a faithful Democrat once upon a time; I don't need to stay a Republican either. There are two groups of people who post on this site.
- The first are people who use Conservatism to advance the aims of the Republican Party.
- The second are people who use the Republican Party to advance the aims of Conservatism.
I am of the second group.
32
posted on
03/06/2007 5:56:43 PM PST
by
markomalley
(Extra ecclesiam nulla salus CINO-RINO GRAZIE NO)
To: areafiftyone
First of all I'm a Roman Catholic and I don't know any Catholics who reads this tripe. Second, I know many Roman Catholics who will vote for Rudy in a NY Minute. Third Roman Catholics don't like to let the church (especially the Roman Catholic Church) decide for them who to vote for when it comes to politics. Let me guess: You're really John F. Kerry????
33
posted on
03/06/2007 5:57:49 PM PST
by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: EagleUSA
Rudy was a REPUBLICAN and a TWICE ELECTED REPUBLICAN MAYOR, long before Hillary ever swept into a state she'd never lived in, to run for the Senate seat as a carpetbagger.
But you and your and your ilk post lie after lie after lie, as though it were fact, because you are incapable of actual debate.
To: madprof98
Oh sure. The day the Roman Catholic church or any church dictates to us who to vote for then we are not the U.S. anymore.
35
posted on
03/06/2007 5:59:01 PM PST
by
areafiftyone
(RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
To: madprof98
They use two boogeymen to scare us into voting for Giuliani: Hillary and 9/11. Its not working. So they then proceed to tell us they don't need us anyway, or we are nutjob, extreme rightwing, crazies.
Liberal tactics for a liberal candidate.
36
posted on
03/06/2007 5:59:23 PM PST
by
abishai
To: markomalley
37
posted on
03/06/2007 5:59:50 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: markomalley
I am of the second group. Me too. They nominate Rudy, and it will be the end of the coalition with the social conservative/Reagan Democrats. Where will we go? I don't know, but I'll bet some enterprising soul will come along with a good answer.
38
posted on
03/06/2007 6:00:27 PM PST
by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: nopardons
TWICE ELECTED REPUBLICAN MAYOR "of the most liberal city in the US sans San Fracisco"
39
posted on
03/06/2007 6:00:36 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: markomalley
Right, Mark.
Keep praying.
40
posted on
03/06/2007 6:00:51 PM PST
by
wireman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-554 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson