Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beancounter13
The same pseudo-liberal (George H.W. Bush) that gave us Souter also gave us Thomas. Even Ronald Reagan gave us Scalia, but the less reliable moderate conservatives Kennedy and O’Connor.

Would you rather go 1 for 2 or 0 for 2 on Supreme Court nominees? That’s the practical issue we’re going to face if Rudy becomes the nominee and faces Hillary!, Obama or Edwards. And, unfortunately, I don’t see any viable conservative presidential candidate except for maybe Fred Thompson - who so far, isn’t running.

170 posted on 04/21/2007 7:28:13 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: conservative in nyc
Would you rather go 1 for 2 or 0 for 2 on Supreme Court nominees?

That's the real question isn't it? I asked earlier on this thread so far without an answer: What makes anyone believe Rudy will even go for even one conservative for SCOTUS?

As for myself, I don't think he would go for any conservatives based upon his positions on abortion, gun control, gay marriage, etc. Those positions do not mesh with an "original constuctionist" interpretation of our Constitution.

263 posted on 04/21/2007 7:48:12 PM PDT by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson