Posted on 04/23/2007 9:57:58 AM PDT by InfantryMarine
Vote Now! It is being bombed with an organized effort from the anti's and they are now in majority.
Click here: The BIG One - WTAM 1100
http://www.wtam.com/pages/cybervote/?r=484
Bump.
Yes’ are winning...come on FRiends!!!
Should the U.S. have tougher gun control laws?
Yes - 51.87% (1181 votes)
No - 48.18% (1097 votes)
Yes - 50.77% (1181 votes)
No - 49.27% (1146 votes)
Needs Freeping
That link shows the ‘results’ but I didn’t see a location to actually cast a vote.
Yes - 49.83% (1181 votes)
No - 50.21% (1190 votes)
its working...keep freeping
Should the U.S. have tougher gun control laws?
Yes - 49.43% (1181 votes)
No - 50.61% (1209 votes)
Keep Going!
http://www.wtam.com/pages/cybervote/?r=820
Then to “Station” (Upper page left) Drop down to “Cybervote”
Of course, I voted “No”.
But...I believe that there should be tougher gun laws as far as restricting mental defectives, felons and non-US citizens from gaining access to firearms.
Should the U.S. have tougher gun control laws?
Yes - 48.02% (1223 votes)
No - 52.02% (1325 votes)
Your Selection Is Highlighted
Should the U.S. have tougher gun control laws?
Yes - 48.13% (1235 votes)
No - 51.91% (1332 votes)
Thanks for the heads up.
Should the U.S. have tougher gun control laws?
Yes - 48.72% (1299 votes)
No - 51.31% (1368 votes)
Freeped 51% no as of 1:10
Should the U.S. have tougher gun control laws?
Yes - 48.90% (1335 votes)
No - 51.14% (1396 votes)
A DANGER TO SOCIETY
Bedlam Revisited
Why the Virginia Tech shooter was not committed.
BY JONATHAN KELLERMAN
Monday, April 23, 2007 12:01 a.m.
......If the Virginia Tech shooter had been locked up for careful observation in a humane mental hospital, the worst-case scenario would’ve been a minor league civil liberties goof: an unpleasant semester break for an odd and hostile young misanthrope who might’ve even have learned to be more polite. Yes, it’s possible confinement would’ve been futile or even stoked his rage. But a third outcome is also possible: Simply getting a patient through a crisis point can prevent disaster, as happens with suicidal people restrained from self-destruction who lose their enthusiasm for repeat performances.
At the very least, in a better world, time spent on psychiatric watch could’ve been used to justify placing the Virginia killer on a no-buy gun list. I’m not naïve enough to believe that illegal firearms aren’t within reach for anyone who really wants them, but just as loud dogs deter burglars and crime rates drop during harsh weather, sometimes making life difficult for a would-be criminal is enough...
Unless we confront the unpleasant fact that the brains of a small percentage of our citizens incubate dark, disturbed thoughts that can blossom into vicious behavior, we can look forward to repeats of last week’s outrage.”..............
excerpt.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html
Done.
It’s too close :(
It’s neck and neck, the libs are winning.
These two classes of people are already prohibited from owning firearms by federal law, with penalties ranging from $10,000 in fines to 5+ years in prison.
How much tougher should the laws be? Would you like to see people in these classes who break the law summarily executed? /rhet
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.