Yes, the Giuliani spectacle is bringing surprises to many who were ignorant about his base of support:
* Supporters of abortion who’ve claimed to be against it (reminiscent of a religious pro-abortion protest in a Denver stadium long ago).
* Closet opponents of our Second Amendment.
* Supporters of unconstitutional power for corrupt municipal governments.
* Opponents of our defense.
Giuliani ‘not confident’ war will turn around
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1785020/posts
Giuliani Says He Is Running for President in ’08 [And criticized our President on Iraq.]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1785153/posts
* Supporters of homosexual activism.
The list goes on.
But, yeah, when liberals run the show, any attack is more likely to succeed.
I'd feel a little better about the potential for and the amount of damage likely with Guliani in charge than ANY Democrat (except, maybe Joe Lieberman.. I pretty much equate the two overall; Both social liberals that are fairly rational when it comes to defense.).
But, if Guliani is the best we can really do, then we likely deserve whatever we get from the jihadis.
Absolutely right. He “hates abortion” but does not want to stop it. Almost sounds like Clinton’s “safe but rare.”