Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/26/2007 12:57:36 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


"Encouraged by the majority's determination that the future can change the past, I respectfully dissent," he concluded.

Me Too!

2 posted on 04/26/2007 12:58:14 PM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

“A dog’s breakfast” — now that’s a good one.


3 posted on 04/26/2007 1:00:35 PM PDT by Silly (http://www.sarcasmoff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I love this guy!


4 posted on 04/26/2007 1:01:09 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Roberts Hits Stevens Over Death Penalty

No hitting!

5 posted on 04/26/2007 1:04:07 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Did we ever here an admission of error from this person concerning CJ Roberts?

http://www.anncoulter.org/cgi-local/printer_friendly.cgi?article=66

It was a foolish article at the time and it’s foolish now.

GWB has been the best President for SCOTUS nominations since before FDR.


7 posted on 04/26/2007 1:08:59 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
the author of a dissent issued in 1988 writes two majority opinions concluding that the views established in that dissent actually represented 'clearly established' federal law at that time.

Well, 'clearly established' in his own mind anyway.

8 posted on 04/26/2007 1:15:12 PM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Gotta love the incongruous and tendentious juxtaposition between the two men which opens the piece: Stevens is the benign elderly figure who treats the young Chief Justice with kindness and respect, while the impudent Roberts responds with unkind attacks—and the week after the old man’s birthday, no less! ... And Roberts bullies Stevens in the Supreme Court cafeteria and steals the old man’s milk money too.


11 posted on 04/26/2007 1:21:12 PM PDT by AHerald ("Be faithful to God ... do not bother about the ridicule of the foolish." - St. Pio of Pietrelcina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
a well timed pop of a blown up paper bag behind Steven's back and we'd really have a good supreme court (dreaming. just dreaming)
12 posted on 04/26/2007 1:25:01 PM PDT by llevrok (Do cats have belly buttons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Why cain’t we awl git alonggg???

I agree, a “dogs breakfast” is a good one!!!

I didn’t think Roberts was that hip! He surprises me!!!

His mentor would be proud!!!

Blown up paper bag behind Steven’s chair!!! Pulleeeze!!! That would be damn funny to see though...

You guys are cracking me up today!


15 posted on 04/26/2007 1:34:34 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I think what Roberts is saying, in a sense, is “it’s time for the dog-track, old timer!” The sooner Stevens takes his leave, the better for the court and the country.


18 posted on 04/26/2007 2:01:48 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("Salvation is not free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

is there a way to find a transcript of the actual dissent?


19 posted on 04/26/2007 2:11:09 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (Dennis Miller said it best “Liberals always feel your pain. Unless of course, they caused it.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

meanwhile, the Governor of Tennessee effectively ended the death penalty in the state. Inmates on death row are cheering.

Althought billed as a moderate, when it comes to pandering to his far left constituents, Phil Bredeson is as bad as they come.


29 posted on 04/26/2007 4:07:08 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Reid must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
One note from somebody who's taken a few laps around the courthouse square:

Smart appellate judges don't take disagreement with their opinions -- even highly pointed disagreement -- as personal. You put the proposed majority out there, you catch some dissents from judges who disagree. When the issues are important (and just about everything that reaches the Supremes is important), then you can expect dissents (and revisions to the majority to respond to the dissent) to be downright polemic.

It comes with the job. Apparently the reporter either has no idea of this, or he's just using the opportunity to slam the Chief Justice.

If Stevens is taking this personally, it's just one more indication that it's past time for him to retire.

30 posted on 04/26/2007 4:10:25 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Roberts, now there’s a guy I like. Level-headed, polite, dignified, unassuming...makes it all the more meaningful when he decides to rip them a new one.


41 posted on 04/26/2007 6:10:13 PM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Stevens is another addled little man whose time has passed. He needs to go...along with the little bug-eyed, pipe-cleaner lady.


44 posted on 04/26/2007 6:52:42 PM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
State courts would find it difficult, if not impossible, to discern federal law from those rulings, he said.

That's precisely the intention of multiple confusing or contradictory opinions. Without proper legal guidance, the states will throw their hands up in the air and give up on the death penalty altogether.
48 posted on 04/26/2007 8:41:47 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
“Encouraged by the majority’s determination that the future can change the past, I respectfully dissent,” he concluded.

Can I read Roe v. Wade into this comment? Where are the Libs claiming “Stare Decisis, Stare Decisis; It’s settled law, Stevens can’t do that” on this particular decision.
Little did Stevens know he was laying the groundwork for overturning the abortion ruling.

50 posted on 04/28/2007 1:02:33 PM PDT by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
This week, Roberts had some words for Stevens, who turned 87 last week. And they were not nearly so kind.

I'm soooo happy he's 87. I wish he'd hurry up and retire/die before Bush leaves office. I'm sure Roberts was much kinder to Stevens than I would have been. I'm so glad Bush put Roberts in instead of Harriet Myers. I think she would easily been influenced by the others.

51 posted on 04/28/2007 1:05:53 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008! HE IS A TRUE CONSERVATIVE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I like the way Chief Justice Roberts is turning out.


54 posted on 04/29/2007 7:10:01 PM PDT by RKB-AFG (Conservative Pride)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson