Posted on 04/26/2007 6:21:05 PM PDT by do the dhue
ORANGEBURG, S.C. Apr 26, 2007 (AP)— Democratic presidential hopefuls flashed their anti-war credentials Thursday night, heaping criticism on President Bush's Iraq policy in the first debate of the 2008 campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
I watched part of it. I think I have dain bramage because I didn't understand a word they said.
No big deal though. If I wanted to understand the commie demorats, I would have to blow 90% of my brains out and cut my manhood off. I am not willing to understand them.
All I want to know is who promised to surrender the soonest.
The EPA should bring an action against the entire crowd for polluting the airwaves. What a bunch of shit they were spewing. If I were a Dim, I’d be sick to my stomach thinking this is the best the party has to offer. Just pitiful.
HEAR HEAR
I liked the question Graham asked:
WHO WON?
In the 5 years that we have been fighting the war on terror, I have YET to hear any lib tell us what they would do other than cut and run and hide....
Well thats not an choice for me....all libs need to be replaced by the soilders coming home from the war....put them in office, get rid of all libs and RINO’s....
I am not a Rudy fan. But his comment the other day about either being on the OFFENSIVE in war on terror with a Republican or playing DEFENSE, would be a good mantra for the 2008 election. WE already know that unless Lieberman gets in this race the Democrat will be a pull out now, withdraw, retreat person.
Yes they have. They’ll use “diplomacy” which is liberalese for “give away the store and pay our enemies blackmail money not to kill us.”
I heard that on Rush or Hannity's show yesterday.
Don’t you know the Dems want to take the defense budget and expand welfare. Plenty of illegals, kids and lazy arses we need to help.
I LOVE IT!!!
I’m not a Rudy fan either. But before we go nuts on a RINO, we need to consider the alternatives. On one hand you have Rudy or McCain or Romney. On the other, you have Clinton, Obama, Edwards and the folks even further left.
So, if we don’t vote for someone who can win, just think who you will get. Let us get half-a-loaf and come back for the half later.
Fight on and win.
OMG is that a bumber sticker... I gotta have it...
Don’t call them Democratic, because they aren’t.
Rudy sounded great the other day. I’ll support him or any Republican candidate against these clowns.
Let’s see... I bet their posturing on the war goes something like this:
“If I knew then what I know now, I never would have voted to authorize the war...”
“If we transition the troops now, the terrorist attacks will subside...”
“The war is lost... Bush’s fault... We have to outline our exit plan for all the world (and our enemies) to see.”
“Bush lied; people died.”
There, you didn’t have to watch this farce.
“FAILURE IN IRAQ Dominates Democratic Debate” would be a more fitting title.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.