Posted on 05/30/2007 5:36:46 AM PDT by bmweezer
Fred-Mitt-08
I bet Rudy McRomney and even Newt are not looking forward to Fred's announcement. Hunter is playing his cards right by suggesting more Rs get into the race (hint hint).
Nope. Now way I want to see ‘Global Warming is real’ Newt anywhere near the White House.
That would be a GREAT ticket!
Lynn Cheney? THAT would make the lib's heads explode. :)
I don’t care about the ticket, as long as it has Fred! at the top!
Did you say springtime?
The Party was having trouble
What a sad, sad story
Needed a new leader to restore
Its former glory
Where, oh, where was she?
Where could that woman be?
We looked around and then we found
The woman for you and me
LEAD TENOR DEMOCRAT OPERATIVE:
And now it's...
Springtime for Hillary and the Party
The White House is happy and gay! ...
Thanks to Mel Brooks. I should re-do the whole song one of these days.
Whoo Hooo! * FredEx * When you absolutely positively have to save the country.
Fred could get one maybe two terms and Mitt two after it. Would be one of the stronger tickets.
There is no way this woman will vote for a woman because she is a woman. I care about the issues. Besides, there are probably more women who won’t vote for a woman because she’s a woman than will.
I like Bolton, too; however, I imagine when all the analysis is complete the Republicans will choose someone who they believe will carry some strategic region of the country. Not sure what Bolton brings to the dance in that department. In my opinion, Bolton would be a superb Secretary of State.
You might be right ,but I doubt Ann Coulter would run.
Works for me. Mitt Romney is certainly not a deal-breaker. But first things first. We have to get Thompson in the White House before we start thinking about 2016.
The GOP nomination is now between Fred and whoever’s left of the rest. Rudy and Romney will basically fight to be the one to face Fred.
Thanks for the ping. (FredEx...LOL)
I'll be there. And with a Montecristo, too.
Isn't an increase in ice flow into the sea usually a result of an increase in the size of the glaciers? Thicker and heavier glaciers pushing more ice down into the sea?
For more ice to flow down due to melting, it would have to be obviously significant melting. It would seem that slightly increased melting would simply result in the flow of more water rather than the flow of more ice.
I hope that you’re right, but I just cannot get out of my mind, the picture of millions of “Liberated” women going to the polls en masse to “vote for a woman, because it’s OUR time”...............
“Id like nothing more than to see a Thompson/Gingrich ticket.”
As much as I enjoy Newt’s observations, he is not a viable candidate for the ‘08 ticket. It’s not just his baggage. He is a smart academic who is often too clever by half. His practical wisdom is pretty low, and I doubt if Fred would tolerate him.
Announcement over 4th of July weekend is brilliant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.