Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Incident Of Dumb Cops Arresting A Guy For Using An Open Wi-Fi Connection
Information Week ^ | Jun 1, 2007 | Mitch Wagner

Posted on 06/02/2007 1:03:33 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty

A Michigan cop, who'd obviously been hit over the head with a billy club one time too many, levied criminal charges against a man who used an open, public Wi-Fi network outside the cafe that was running it.

The dastardly computer criminal, Sam Peterson II, of Cedar Springs, Mich., chose to pay a $400 fine, do 40 hours of community service, and stay on probation six months.

Peterson has no criminal record. He's a 39-year-old toolmaker, volunteer firefighter, and secretary of a bagpipe band.

Peterson had gotten in the habit of checking e-mail on his lunch break in front of the Re-Union Street Cafe in Sparta, Mich. "[I]instead of going inside the shop to use the free Wi-Fi offered to paying customers, he chose to remain in his car and piggyback off the network, which he said didn't require a password," according to the article from Fox News. He did it on lunch breaks for more than a week.

Now, here's where the craziness starts.

Someone in a nearby barbershop saw Peterson's car pull up every day and sit in front of the coffee shop without anybody getting out.

A sane person would have knocked on Peterson's window and said, "Dude, I noticed you come here and sit in your car every day? What's up with that?"

But of course we live in paranoid times.

So the dummy in the barbershop called the cops.

Sparta Police Chief Andrew Milanowski asked Peterson where he got the Internet connection, and Petsron said from the cafe.

Now, the story so far is shocking enough, but it gets even more shocking:

Milanowski ruled out Peterson as a possible stalker of the attractive local hairdresser, but still felt that a law might have been broken.

"We came back and we looked up the laws and we figured if we found one and thought, 'Well, let's run it by the prosecutor's office and see what they want to do,'" Milanowski said.

Here's how that reads to me: They don't care about who's using Wi-Fi in Sparta, Mich. The police chief just didn't like the way Peterson parted his hair, and so he dug and dug and dug until he found something he could charge Peterson with.

Peterson copped a plea. If he'd fought it, he could have faced a sentence of up to five years in jail, and a $10,000 fine.

Sparta, Mich. residents, when you pay your tax bills, I want you to think about how this kind of nonsense is how your government is spending your money.

Laws like the Michigan law are pretty common, and they're just plain bad law.

A reasonable person encountering an open Wi-Fi connection will assume it's open until finding evidence otherwise. But most hacking laws assume the opposite -- you need to be told that you can use the Wi-Fi connection or else the law assumes you're a criminal.

In the real world, landowners are required to post their land as private property before accusing someone else of trespassing. The law correctly recognizes that you can't accuse people of crossing boundaries unless they're told where the boundaries. Laws governing Wi-Fi should be written similarly. If you want to keep trespassers off your network, you should password-protect it.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
This is pretty much the behavior of a stalker or someone who is up to no good.

This is pretty much the behavior of many people on their lunch break.

If someone doesn't want to share their wi-fi they should put a password on it. Otherwise they are, in fact, sharing it. The law doesn't properly match the way this works.

21 posted on 06/02/2007 1:42:59 PM PDT by FreePoster (Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Amnesty for all of the unprotected network users!


22 posted on 06/02/2007 1:43:35 PM PDT by Edgar3 (Steve Spurrier for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

So if your outside standing under a street lamp reading the newspaper, can they charge your with theft of electricity?


23 posted on 06/02/2007 1:45:42 PM PDT by Jambe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
I leave my wifi open to be nice to others as I tend to use open connections when on the road too. I notice contractor pickups parked on the street checking their e-mail, so I believe that it is being used. (The wifi sits below much of the rest of the home network and doesn't seem to be much of a risk - the unit is pw protected so others can't easily reconfigure).

The cops sure love to look through the excessive # of laws we have if they want to screw u. Seen it happen.

24 posted on 06/02/2007 1:46:38 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
I wouldn’t use someone’s phone without asking, why would I use their internet connection without asking?

He did ask. More accurately, his computer did when it requested access. Since the access was granted, he was using it with the permission of the network and, by extension, its owner.

25 posted on 06/02/2007 1:48:28 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Never tell the cops anything when they stop you without probable cause.

True indeed, but even showing a hint of belligerence is foolishly playing with fire.

First say "What can I do for you, officer?" or "Is something wrong?"

This guy should not have been using the connection in the first place, but definitely should have closed his browser and opened a game program when he saw a cop coming.

26 posted on 06/02/2007 1:49:03 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace Begins in the Womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
if the wi-fi is owned by the coffee shop, they would have had to have pressed charges. right?

Not necessarily, if its a violation of state or federal law.

27 posted on 06/02/2007 1:59:46 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Have you ever sat outside a club or store and listened to the music they’re playing inside?

“Officer, that man is sitting outside and he’s LISTENING to our music, but he’s not BUYING anything. Arrest him.”


28 posted on 06/02/2007 2:00:16 PM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

“In other news, several kids were taken to juvenile for water theft after running through a neighbor’s sprinker.”

Yes, and we’re all going to be arrested for enjoying the smells outside of bakeries and restaurants as well. Hopefully a sane judge will award the damaged parties a monetary penalty of the sound of loose change jingling.


29 posted on 06/02/2007 2:01:18 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (The Republican party of today is the Whig party of 1856.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Far more likely is Peterson was actually stalking but they didn't have enough proof to charge him with the actual deed.

Ah, I see you are a law enforcement officer.
That's a philosophy that would lock everyone up until they can prove there's no reason to.

30 posted on 06/02/2007 2:03:20 PM PDT by feedback doctor (I didn't leave the Republican Party, it left me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

“Far more likely is Peterson was actually stalking but they didn’t have enough proof to charge him with the actual deed.”

If I were a cop you shouldn’t have any reason to deny my a request to search your car or house.


31 posted on 06/02/2007 2:07:47 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (The Republican party of today is the Whig party of 1856.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
Do all you sniffing outside Jimmy John's, just to play it safe. :-)


32 posted on 06/02/2007 2:10:41 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
True indeed, but even showing a hint of belligerence is foolishly playing with fire.

I didn't say be belligerent. I just said don't tell them anything. You can do that very politely. "I'm just sitting here in my car deciding if I want a latte' or a capuccino, officer."

33 posted on 06/02/2007 2:19:06 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I didn't say be belligerent. I just said don't tell them anything. You can do that very politely.

Yes, but I would NEVER ask a cop if I were under arrest or if I were being detained illegally. Diplomacy works best with cops because you never know when you are dealing with someone drunk on power. You always want to act as if you are on their side and respect their authority, even if the cop you are dealing with is a stupid jerk.

34 posted on 06/02/2007 2:33:36 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace Begins in the Womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty
“”We came back and we looked up the laws and we figured if we found one and thought, ‘Well, let’s run it by the prosecutor’s office and see what they want to do,’” Milanowski said.”

The solution to stupidity like this, is to reduce the offending law enforcement entities budget by 25% immediately.

As Reagan did, defund the b@#tards.

35 posted on 06/02/2007 2:38:07 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

The list, for what it’s worth, sounds like an ACLU recommendation. They like to see officers baited into confrontations, because they take the philosophy that revenge is best served cold.


36 posted on 06/02/2007 2:40:37 PM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Best advice I’ve ever heard.


37 posted on 06/02/2007 2:41:29 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Famously frisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty
Dumb Cop?
Craziness?
Being hit on the head with a billy club one too many times?

The only doofus I see in this story is the author.

The old "if you don't actually lose anything in the process, I can steal anything I want any time" criminal posture still doesn't do it for me.
The Bevis and Butthead mentality.

Is this Einstein writer aware that "freeloading" wireless criminals have stolen hundreds of thousands of accounts and identities?

Last I checked, it's illegal to rob banks even if the front doors are unlocked. Ditto for burglarizing homes or automobiles.

Blaming the victims is a non-starter.

The freeloading criminals stealing music for years are seriously attempting to make this type of crime "normal" and not a big deal.

38 posted on 06/02/2007 2:45:23 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
I’m wondering if this “open” wi-fi was of the type that when you connect to the signal, you get a “terms” page that you have to click accept on before proceeding. 5 out of the 6 places I’ve recently been to that advertises it has wi-fi has had these “terms” pages to go through first. Prominently listed on those pages was the boilerplate language that states that the wi-fi is for the intended use of customers and by clicking on the “accept” button, you agree to the terms.
39 posted on 06/02/2007 2:47:37 PM PDT by jettester (I got paid to break 'em - not fly 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Is this Einstein writer aware that "freeloading" wireless criminals have stolen hundreds of thousands of accounts and identities?

An identity thief can in fact set up to mimic a Wi-Fi server and do man-in-the-middle attacks like this. But this wasn't happening here, or it would have been found by investigators upon getting the guy's laptop. Not to say it shouldn't be deemed a crime, but something like this is much more like petty shoplifting than it is like murder.

40 posted on 06/02/2007 2:49:05 PM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson