Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid says U.S. strike on Iran would be destabilizing
Reuters ^

Posted on 06/11/2007 4:19:51 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Sub-Driver

Hey Harry, how’s that mob thing you’ve got going for you in Las Vegas?
Shake down any old ladies lately?
Do any dirty land deals in the last few days?
Dirtbag.


21 posted on 06/11/2007 4:32:44 PM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What’s that I smell? Did Harry open his mouth again?


22 posted on 06/11/2007 4:33:51 PM PDT by Garvin (Join the Marines, see the world, meet new people and kill them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

You nailed it.


23 posted on 06/11/2007 4:34:14 PM PDT by TheDon (The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid rejected on Monday another prominent senator's call for a military strike against Iran, saying a U.S. attack would destabilize the Middle East.

Like its real stable now?

24 posted on 06/11/2007 4:34:39 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Harry Reid is just a scared schoolgirl.

25 posted on 06/11/2007 4:34:55 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

And to think this is suggested by Joe Lieberman, who used to be considered a good Democrat.

Lieberman is too independent for the Democrats, pun intended. He’s a loyal Democrat on so many other issues, but on national security and defense and the war on terror, he’s put politics aside for the national interest.

Lieberman’s off the Democrat plantation. Hillary should talk to him about plantations. Then maybe he would blindly follow the party line again.


26 posted on 06/11/2007 4:35:14 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Let’s see,Iran is destabilizing Iraq,Syria is destabilizing Lebanon,and the Palestinians are trying to destabilize Israel,but I guess Reid hasn’t heard about any of those situations !!!


27 posted on 06/11/2007 4:35:31 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

An attack on Harry Reid’s pea brain would be stablizing.


28 posted on 06/11/2007 4:36:09 PM PDT by dforest (Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Lieberman’s off the Democrat plantation. Hillary should talk to him about plantations. Then maybe he would blindly follow the party line again.

"And you KNOW what I'm talkin' about!"

29 posted on 06/11/2007 4:37:32 PM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Polls are for strippers and liberals." Caller to Rush, 6/5/2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Reid would prefer that Iran nuke Israel.

Or America. Or both.


30 posted on 06/11/2007 4:37:55 PM PDT by airborne (Airborne - Ranger - Vietnam veteran! Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Reid is correct.
It would be destabilizing.
To Iran.
Awwww, Hell!
Why not?
Do it!!


31 posted on 06/11/2007 4:39:03 PM PDT by Gideon Reader (DEMOCRATS: Not quite American, and proud of it! Palestinians are,...well,... Palestinian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"We, the DNC, put the Iran terrorists into power in '79.
They are our 'children'."

32 posted on 06/11/2007 4:41:22 PM PDT by Diogenesis (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Not as destabilizing as Reid the Democrats have been!


33 posted on 06/11/2007 4:42:04 PM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

US must be getting ready to strike or Powell and Reid would not be talking about it!


34 posted on 06/11/2007 4:43:23 PM PDT by restornu (Be safe Buy American made)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abelman

On Fox tonight they agreed that he is a front man for Chuck Schumer.


35 posted on 06/11/2007 4:43:57 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Quotes from Dennis Miller on Dingy Harry

Whenever I see Reid speak, I half expect to see Marg Helgenberger and the CSI team run out and put a chalk outline around the podium

To quote the great Stephen Boyd, the constant bring-down, from “We killed the Patriot Act,” to “We’ll gain House seats,” to his magnum opus “We’ve lost the war,” Reid has been unrelentingly bleak in his appraisal of the conflict of our lifetime. I think he believes that getting his negative comments in early could be the one chance that a nonentity like he has at a place in history

Senator, only in the off-the-rack culture that we currently have could a whiny hack like you somehow rise to a position of leadership

The bad guys look to you to reinforce the belief that we are the weak horse and eminently conquerable. You are making that assertion so easy for them that they no doubt view you as the derriere of said horse

You are a vague, translucent, living shade who barely matters, and if you really want to serve the country that affords a trifle like you the opportunity to delude himself into thinking that he matters, you must never ever speak out loud in public again!


36 posted on 06/11/2007 4:44:17 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

CLICK


37 posted on 06/11/2007 4:50:52 PM PDT by restornu (Be safe Buy American made)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It would definitely de-stabalize Iran Harry


38 posted on 06/11/2007 4:51:10 PM PDT by democratsaremyenemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

“Someone should tell Harry that a Nuke used on the United States will be destabilizing.”

Destabilizing? If any muzzie slime ever sets off a nuke in the USA, I would hope that every muzzie holy site, capital, city, town and village would soon turn to a slag heap smouldering in the desert. After this is accomplished we could think about negotiating of the unconditional surrender. Oh wait, there are no terms except surrender or glow.


39 posted on 06/11/2007 4:57:24 PM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

A strike on Iran would remove the strongest anti-American state in the region (taking Saudi Arabia to an American ally—its government is largely an ally even if the people aren’t).


40 posted on 06/11/2007 5:00:47 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson