Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force Considered Gay 'Love Bomb' Against Enemies
FOX ^ | 06/12/07 | Unknown

Posted on 06/12/2007 11:58:23 AM PDT by Froufrou

The Air Force on Tuesday confirmed a report that in 1994 a military researcher requested $7.5 million to develop a non-lethal "love bomb" that would chemically alter the state of mind of enemy troops and make them want to have sex with each other rather than fight. Air Force spokeswoman Lt. Col. Cathy Reardon said the idea was proposed by an Air Force researcher at a lab at Brooks Air Force Base in Texas, but it was rejected by the Defense Department. Officials noted that the Air Force constantly is considering funding proposals. No money was spent, Reardon said, and no such weapons are being considered. The goal was to create a non-lethal weapon to be used against enemy troops. First reported by KPIX-TV in San Francisco, the discovery of the "gay bomb" proposal came from a Freedom of Information Act request made by Edward Hammond of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, a watchdog group that tracks military spending. As part of the military's goal of developing non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: threepeat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
Mondo bizarro
1 posted on 06/12/2007 11:58:26 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

What if the wind blows in the wrong direction?


2 posted on 06/12/2007 11:59:23 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Who used it on San Francisco?


3 posted on 06/12/2007 11:59:54 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Make love not War!! lol


4 posted on 06/12/2007 11:59:56 AM PDT by Ancient Drive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Did anyone tell Al Quada it was a placebo?


5 posted on 06/12/2007 12:00:03 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (I buy gas for my SUV with the Carbon Offsets I sell on Ebay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Heard this a long time ago.


6 posted on 06/12/2007 12:00:13 PM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Accidental detonation in the San Fransisco lab scuttled the project.


7 posted on 06/12/2007 12:00:52 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Was it designated the BFU-69?


8 posted on 06/12/2007 12:01:49 PM PDT by E Rocc (Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
$7.5 million to develop a non-lethal "love bomb" that would chemically alter the state of mind of enemy troops and make them want to have sex with each other rather than fight.

They saved a bunch of money by spending $15 dollars on the bomb that made them want to have sex with goats.

9 posted on 06/12/2007 12:01:52 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Damn. I think they tested this thing over San Francisco!


10 posted on 06/12/2007 12:02:00 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Chemtrails?
11 posted on 06/12/2007 12:02:09 PM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Froufrou
This would be a perfect weapon for the Iranians, North Koreans Chinese, Venezuelans, Cubans...


13 posted on 06/12/2007 12:02:48 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

lemme guess: they tried starting with camel and goat pheremones


14 posted on 06/12/2007 12:02:56 PM PDT by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
The military considered funding an effort to look for pheromone/hormones to change soldier’s behaviour.

No funding spent, no chemicals considered, no contract let, no action taken.

It’s doubtful that such a compound exists in the first place.

What an exciting article about nothing at all.

If it did not have the emanation of a penumbra of sleazy sex it would never have made the news at all.

15 posted on 06/12/2007 12:03:56 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty
Did anyone tell Al Quada it was a placebo?
LOL!
16 posted on 06/12/2007 12:05:13 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Every time I read this, it occurs to me it me it might backfire: imagine our guys coming across muzzies ravaging each other instead of fighting. They might just collapse in helpless laughter!


17 posted on 06/12/2007 12:05:28 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
No. It was the BFU-66 (or the bigger 99). The BFU-88 was tailored for lesbians.
18 posted on 06/12/2007 12:05:52 PM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I laughed too as I typed.


19 posted on 06/12/2007 12:05:57 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (I buy gas for my SUV with the Carbon Offsets I sell on Ebay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Don’t Bomb- Don’t Tell?


20 posted on 06/12/2007 12:06:08 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside (Rudy Giuliani is just another "Empty Dress Republican")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson