Skip to comments.
U.S. Appeals Court Dismisses Challenge of Bush Administration's Domestic Surveillance Program
Fox News ^
Posted on 07/06/2007 7:35:28 AM PDT by Blue Turtle
Appeals Court Dismisses ACLU Lawsuit Challenging Bush's Eavesdropping Program
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aclu; homelandsecurity; islam; lawsuit; muhammadsminions; spying; waronislamism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: Blue Turtle
More bad news for the moonbat Left.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2
posted on
07/06/2007 7:36:17 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Blue Turtle
A nice birthday present for President Bush.
3
posted on
07/06/2007 7:36:54 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: goldstategop
The ACLU just got burned.
To: Blue Turtle
5
posted on
07/06/2007 7:37:29 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No wonder Mexico is so filthy. Everybody who does cleaning jobs is HERE!.......)
To: goldstategop
6
posted on
07/06/2007 7:37:31 AM PDT
by
kitkat
(I refuse to let the DUers chase me off FR.)
To: Blue Turtle
7
posted on
07/06/2007 7:37:52 AM PDT
by
Jemian
(PAM of JT ~~ Freedom is never given. It is won.)
To: Blue Turtle
Watch -- congress will be outraged, begin an investigation and vote on a non-binding resolution
To: Blue Turtle; SandRat; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; blam; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; ...
9
posted on
07/06/2007 7:39:56 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
To: Blue Turtle
CINCINNATI A federal appeals court on Friday ordered the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging President Bush’s domestic spying program, saying the plaintiffs had no standing to sue.
The 2-1 ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel was not on the legality of the surveillance program. But it vacated an order by a lower court in Detroit last Augist that the post-911 warrantless surveillance aimed at uncovering terrorist activity was unconstitutional, violating rights to privacy and free speech and the separation of powers.
The American Civil Liberties Union led the suit on behalf of other groups including lawyers, journalists and scholars it says have been handicapped in doing their jobs by the government monitoring.
The case will be sent back to the U.S. District judge in Michigan for dismissal.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288381,00.html
10
posted on
07/06/2007 7:41:18 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
To: Blue Turtle
If the 6th Circuit did this, this case is permanent toast, an appeal would be fruitless.
To: Blue Turtle
To quote Woodstock...
Tee Hee
12
posted on
07/06/2007 7:42:14 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( Who is the Democrat's George Galloway?)
To: Blue Turtle
13
posted on
07/06/2007 7:42:35 AM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
(The greatest danger to our sovereignty is the Congress of the United States.)
To: Blue Turtle
ACLU Lawsuit Challenging Bush's Eavesdropping Program Of course, this is NOT Bush's program. This is a program put in place by an acting President, with the full force of the United States to thwart terrorists.
14
posted on
07/06/2007 7:43:04 AM PDT
by
C210N
To: SE Mom
“The American Civil Liberties Union led the suit on behalf of other groups including lawyers, journalists and scholars it says have been handicapped in doing their jobs by the government monitoring.”
Yeah, helping the enemy undermine America was a bit tougher with this monitoring. Disgusting aclu scumbags.
To: SE Mom
lawsuit challenging President Bushs domestic spying program... And, once again after a billion MSM lies, its no more domestic than a flight from NY to Paris is a domestic flight.
16
posted on
07/06/2007 7:44:49 AM PDT
by
C210N
To: jude24; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; Congressman Billybob
The 2-1 ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel was not on the legality of the surveillance program. But it vacated an order by a lower court in Detroit last Augist (sic) that the post-911 warrantless surveillance aimed at uncovering terrorist activity was unconstitutional, violating rights to privacy and free speech and the separation of powers.
The underlined part doesn't make sense to me after the first part says is wasn't on "legality."
If the Appeals Court says that the surveillance was constitutional, then how could it not be legal?
17
posted on
07/06/2007 7:49:38 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: Blue Turtle
It is extremely upsetting to me that there exists a judge on the 6th Circuit who actually voted in favor of the ACLU in this case. Never have I seen a case with less merit than this one. The plaintiffs failed to produce a single victim who was affected by this surveillance. No victim = no case.
18
posted on
07/06/2007 7:50:09 AM PDT
by
Hoodat
( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
To: C210N
POW! Right between the horns!
19
posted on
07/06/2007 7:51:27 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: goldstategop
ACLU loses...do they still get paid ?
If not...double woo-hoo
20
posted on
07/06/2007 7:51:44 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Since bad golf shots come in groups of 3, a 4th bad shot is the start of the next group of 3)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson