[an amused spectator]

The study under discussion purports to show that certain contentions contradict observed facts.

Post the whole study, or quit using it as a basis for a factual discussion.

There's far more to it than modeling.

These "professionals" are claiming that they basically are able to model the global climate with their "data". They're asking us to just say "Ave Maria" and have faith.

[drlevy88]

LL’s argument boils down to “Whom Do You Trust” and he’s in the temple of what for all we know are blind guides.

[liberallarry]

Post the whole study, or quit using it as a basis for a factual discussion.

Pay for it yourself. Nobody's forcing you to post to this thread if you feel so strongly that it's worthless.

These "professionals" are claiming that they basically are able to model the global climate with their "data". They're asking us to just say "Ave Maria" and have faith.

No they're not. They're claiming that the data do not support claims that recent global warming is due to solar activity. In particular, that global warming in the last 20 years in exactly the opposite of what one would have expected from recent trends in solar activity.

Your bias is seriously interfering with your thinking.