Although I'm guessing that this will surprise no one, it begs the question: "How many times has this sort of thing happened before, and simply was never caught or brought to light?"
Dan Rather would be proud.
1 posted on
07/14/2007 6:20:40 PM PDT by
Stoat
To: Stoat
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
We cant have any true-to-life pics or videos of PM Brown...
Not sporting, what?
To: Stoat
The Beeb; just telling the lies the Islamofascists won’t tell.
To: Stoat
and how long before the “BEEB” gets its permit pulled by Parliament?
4 posted on
07/14/2007 6:23:47 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Stoat
OXYMORON - “journalistic ethics”
5 posted on
07/14/2007 6:24:39 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: Stoat
Newsnight editor Peter Barron has admitted that a sequence of events had been reversed in the film, but refused to apologise. BBC chiefs have defended the film as 'a cross between Louis Theroux and gonzo journalism'. He went on to say, "We make the news, we don't report it, and I'll personally throttle anyone who has a problem with that!" /sarc
6 posted on
07/14/2007 6:30:31 PM PDT by
Duke Nukum
(Well, Harvey has overcome not only time and space, but any objections.)
To: Stoat
Sounds like the BBC is still taking journalism lessons from OUR press...
7 posted on
07/14/2007 6:32:41 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: Stoat
Even the BBC’s internal report found left-biased reporting, but that correcting such internally would be difficult. This newspaper report posits the motivation for “sexing up” the queen’s photo story and this PM Brown/”thug” story as possibly done to bolster ratings. The way to correct BBC bias is through competition, not any internal reform. Is Murdoch’s Sky TV making inroads on BBC’s previously captive audience?
8 posted on
07/14/2007 6:33:30 PM PDT by
bajabaja
To: Stoat
“There was no intention to deceive anybody.”
Then why did they do it?
9 posted on
07/14/2007 6:44:47 PM PDT by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Stoat
"Mr Brown's officials have complained to the Corporation about an 'unfair, unbalanced, unnecessarily personal, and disingenuous' film which they claim was altered in an attempt to make him look like a thug." This is standard practice for the BBC. It's a rare occurance that they broadcast anything without altering the facts to fit their agenda.
They belong in prison and to have their broadcasting license revoked.
To: Stoat
The BBC report comes over to me as rather supercilious, to say the least, towards Mr. Brown, whereas they appear to be quite sycophantic towards Mr. Cameron. Would this be because Mr. Brown is Scotch?
To: Stoat
I’ve got a feeling it just got impossible for the Don Johson(miami vice) wantabe to get any of the PM’s time. Waste of film.
To: Stoat
13 posted on
07/14/2007 6:58:09 PM PDT by
kalt
To: Stoat
Mr Brown's officials have complained to the Corporation about an 'unfair, unbalanced...I wonder if any of the Fox people are gonna comment on that?
To: Stoat
"How many times has this sort of thing happened before, and simply was never caught or brought to light?"
Sorry, but there's not enough fingers and toes in this country to count that for you.
15 posted on
07/14/2007 7:16:17 PM PDT by
Nova
To: Stoat
Editing Clips and showing them out of order.
The Michael Moore school of film.
16 posted on
07/14/2007 7:43:07 PM PDT by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: Stoat
BBC chiefs have defended the film as 'a cross between Louis Theroux and gonzo journalism'. That isn't exactly a vote of confidence. Gonzo journalism isn't journalism at all. Hunter Thompsom was an entertaining fraud, but a fraud he was.
To: Stoat
The BBC is controlled by the Left. But it can't seem to portray a Labour Prime Minister in a flattering light. Hmmm.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
28 posted on
07/14/2007 11:50:19 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Stoat
There was no intention to deceive anybody.Right.
43 posted on
07/15/2007 2:21:58 AM PDT by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson