Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Read the article I linked to. It states that they used a silicon based semiconductor that doesn’t provide enough power. Next they are going to try a gallium-phosphide semiconductor which should produce better results. No mention of whether or not they will have to still add non sunlight energy to the mix then. Hey, if Orville and Wilber had as many nay sayers on their first 10 second flight at Kittyhawke we’d still be blimping it around the world. :)


48 posted on 07/16/2007 7:35:32 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Delacon
No mention of whether or not they will have to still add non sunlight energy to the mix then.

Waste heat from coal plants?

Maybe place the converter portion of the device in the stack flow, beyond whatever sulfer squelchers are present; and place the solar cell portion on the outside, with wires & collector tubing as & where needed?

Even if it only worked during daylight hours on sunny days, it would still be a big drop in stack CO^2.

Do on-site conversion of the CO to fuel.

87 posted on 07/16/2007 8:48:26 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson