To: Eric Blair 2084
I have always thought the tobacco industry should pick just one state.... say New York, and refuse to sell tobacco in any form there. Just plain cut them off.
Then see how well the politicos like it... no cigarette taxes, all the border states raking in the taxes, and lots and lots and lots of addicts screaming at them day and night. (spoken as a former addict/ but still smoker’s rights advocate)
62 posted on
07/23/2007 3:10:37 PM PDT by
Grammy
(No matter the question, chocolate is the answer.)
To: Grammy
I have always thought the tobacco industry should pick just one state.... say New York, and refuse to sell tobacco in any form there. Just plain cut them off.That is a brilliant idea.
66 posted on
07/23/2007 3:16:11 PM PDT by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: Grammy; Eric Blair 2084
I have always thought the tobacco industry should pick just one state.... say New York, and refuse to sell tobacco in any form there. Just plain cut them off. It can not be done because of the Master Settlement Agreement, at least not by the signatories to the MSA. Not until at least 2024 when the agreement expires.
69 posted on
07/23/2007 3:21:38 PM PDT by
Gabz
(Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
To: Grammy
I have always thought the tobacco industry should pick just one state.... say New York, and refuse to sell tobacco in any form there. Just plain cut them off.
Not New York. I think they're over $5 a pack there now, everyone goes out of state to buy them and bring them back. Then they have to search for somewhere that the Smoking Gestapo won't find them engaging in legal activity.
New York is immune to taxes. It's like they thrive on being robbed by the State.
111 posted on
07/23/2007 6:13:39 PM PDT by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson