To: LdSentinal
Every now and then, Feinstein will exhibit some reason. She’s not as moonbatty as Boxer is.
To: LdSentinal
The decision inflamed liberal activists for its pointed use of the word homosexual instead of gay.
They they'd really hate to hear what I call them.
3 posted on
08/02/2007 5:59:58 PM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(Were those magic grits?)
To: LdSentinal
Never thought I’d say it, but “kudos to Feinstein”.
To: LdSentinal
The decision inflamed liberal activists for its pointed use of the word homosexual instead of gay. It doesn't take much to get these people mad.
5 posted on
08/02/2007 6:02:36 PM PDT by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: LdSentinal
I think I just saw a pig outside my second-floor window.
6 posted on
08/02/2007 6:02:46 PM PDT by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
To: LdSentinal; wardaddy; WileyPink; jmax; Islander7; 2ndDivisionVet; somniferum; flying Elvis; ...
7 posted on
08/02/2007 6:02:48 PM PDT by
WKB
(It's hard to tell who's more afraid of Fred Thompson; The Dims or the rudibots.)
To: LdSentinal
Hmmm, this is the second time in recent history that I’ve been pleasantly surprised by Dianne Feinstein.
11 posted on
08/02/2007 6:07:37 PM PDT by
TheSpottedOwl
(If the families still ran Las Vegas, Harry Reid would be napping at the bottom of Hoover Dam)
To: LdSentinal
ummmmmmmm News flash for the writers of this article, and Leahy, Southwick is not controversial, the Demoncrats and their opinions are.
13 posted on
08/02/2007 6:08:02 PM PDT by
gidget7
( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
To: LdSentinal
Kind of puts the beat down on senator Skru-mer
15 posted on
08/02/2007 6:09:17 PM PDT by
xcamel
("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
To: LdSentinal
And just where was this leadership when the GOP was in the majority? Both chambers’ Republicans fight like dogs when outnumbered, and roll over like sleeping cats when they run things.
Oh, cruel fate. A small toast to the senior Senator from California. Blind pig/acorn moment, or someone’s got the goods on her husband.
16 posted on
08/02/2007 6:13:57 PM PDT by
IslandJeff
(Jeremiah 2:14-22)
To: LdSentinal
17 posted on
08/02/2007 6:16:18 PM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: LdSentinal
In one case, Southwick joined a narrow majority to uphold the reinstatement of a white state employee who had lost his job for using a racial slur.STATE employee > First Amendment rules > correct decision.
In another, he joined a decision to award custody of an 8-year-old child to her father instead of her bisexual mother. The decision inflamed liberal activists for its pointed use of the word homosexual instead of gay.
Social libertarian that I am, I can't get too worked about that one either. The kid had to go to one parent or the other. Unless the dad was clearly unfit in some way, in a culture like Mississippi's, it's probably easier for the kid to live in a home that's less likely to be a target of anti-gay criticism and teasing. And it's appropriate to use technical terms in a legal decision.
To: LdSentinal
The decision inflamed liberal activists for its pointed use of the word homosexual instead of gay.To the gallows with him!
27 posted on
08/02/2007 6:36:32 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: LdSentinal
The decision inflamed liberal activists for its pointed use of the word homosexual instead of gay. Wow, the queers and fagots homosexuals are real sensitive, aren't they.
34 posted on
08/02/2007 7:32:11 PM PDT by
upchuck
(The Hildabeaste fears Fred.)
To: LdSentinal
The Democrats obstructionism is a disgrace and is an example of politics at its worst, said Giuliani in a statement on Democratic opposition to Southwick. Our courts should not be compromised because of partisans who are forgoing their Constitutional responsibilities in order to pursue a political agenda. I am sorry to all Freepers, but this as close to what I would say as any candidate got.
36 posted on
08/02/2007 9:12:40 PM PDT by
normy
(Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
To: LdSentinal
Over the past several weeks, senior Republican members of the Senate Appropriations Committee have put pressure on Feinstein... Wow, this is a tough one. Not! Appropriations? Think about it. It's simple vote-trading, probably to funnel more federal money into her husband's CA businesses. At the extreme, maybe she's playing nice to avoid some awkward ethics quesions on the same subject.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson