Posted on 08/06/2007 2:00:21 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In a recent article, The Economist called blacks and Hispanics “natural allies.” Citing Barack Obama’s “brothers in the fight for equality” reference to the two groups, the writer conceded that with blacks and Hispanics, there’s no such thing.
I frequently blog about what I perceive as a growing battle between blacks and Hispanics for “preferred minority” status. A preferred minority group is one that ostensibly is under-represented in certain professions and universities. This status goes beyond mere numbers and focuses on “oppression.”
For example, while Asians are a minority group in America, they’re not considered oppressed in the same sense, especially when it comes to college and university admissions. Asians are four percent of the population but account for almost 41 percent of undergraduates at the University of California at Berkeley. Bill “quota man” Clinton once said there were “universities in California that could fill their entire freshman classes with nothing but Asian-Americans.”
Lesser qualified minorities are admitted to elite schools so whites can feel good about themselves, and black Americans have occupied the preferred minority perch in admissions and hiring for the past few decades. Hispanics, growing in political power, are demanding their piece of the preference pie.
Given this tension, why would anyone believe blacks and Hispanics are natural allies? Presumably, since both are minority groups victimized by the majority white power structure, they should join together in a black-brown coalition to fight the oppressor. That’s why the Congressional Black Caucus supports legalizing millions of lawbreaking aliens, despite illegal immigration’s negative impact on its members’ constituents.
This impact is most evident in crime statistics. Hate crimes – a nonsensical crime category conceived to punish the thoughts of heterosexual white men – increasingly involve blacks and Hispanics as victims and perpetrators, at least in California. The Economist cited a hate crimes report, which revealed blacks were 59 percent of hate crime victims in Los Angeles County, and most of the time, the perpetrators were Hispanic.
Gangs played a significant factor in hate crimes. About 80 percent of gang-related hate crimes were committed by Hispanics against blacks. As expected, the researchers pointed not to individual thugs or a violence-glorifying subculture, but to an “anti-immigrant sentiment,” invoking mostly-white organizations like the Minuteman Project and Save Our State, groups trying to keep America from becoming a Third World country.
On the political front, California has experienced a demographic shift, and smaller cities like Lynwood, California, are case studies on how this change plays out at the local level. Lynwood, once predominately black, is over 80 percent Hispanic. Forty percent of residents are “foreign-born,” the Los Angeles Times reported, a euphemism in this context for illegal aliens. Because illegal aliens can’t vote, blacks still have the political advantage. If George Bush manages to get his amnesty bill inked, however, millions of “foreign-born” in every city will be on the road to citizenship. And Hispanics, just as race-conscious as blacks, will vote for Hispanics.
Whether one believes illegal aliens are “taking” jobs from blacks in the private sector, Hispanics certainly are using the race preferences hustle for government jobs. Last year, a coalition of Hispanic groups released a report condemning the Office of Personnel Management, the federal government’s hiring agency, for failing to hire and promote more Hispanics. Blacks tend to be overrepresented in federal agencies, and Hispanics, for now, are underrepresented. About 13.3 percent of the population, Hispanics are 7.4 percent of the federal workforce. Proportionately speaking, they are underrepresented. The solution to this problem? Preferences, of course!
Blacks and Hispanics should be natural allies--in support of principles like the rule of law, a necessary component of a fair and free country. Our government shouldn’t have the power, legal or otherwise, to discriminate for or against any group based on race or ethnicity. Eliminating preferences might alleviate some of the tension.
La Shawn Barber is a freelance writer and Townhall.com book reviewer who blogs at www.lashawnbarber.com.
yeah right,
in lost angeles the mexican alabama gang
is killing blacks.
Awhile ago, I met a man who was collecting rents for some small, low-rent properties he owns. He told me he always rents to Mexicans now, because they pay their rent on time, keep the property clean and even do their own repairs, and they’re pleasant and he’s not afraid to collect from them, the way he used to be with his former low-income tenants.
And they do speak English - it may not be completely fluent, but they can communicate with him, and one family even invited him to their daughter’s quinceanera party...
THat’s interesting. I have a similar experience, but in the reverse. I have witnessed the anger and hate from blacks aimed at mexicans. Specifically the ones that don’t speak english well or at all. It seems to be the least educated blacks that speak the poorest english that are the most angry about the mexicans that can’t understand english.
If he is referring to the “leadership” of the black and hispanic communities, yes, they are all-lies.
You are correct.
By and large, blacks and Hispanics do not get along.
One group has a cross-section that saps our tax dollars, while a great majority of them are extremely hard working.
The other group has a larger cross-section that would just as soon sit around and wait for the free government gifts to roll in. They feel like group #1 will spoil everything for them, and view them with no small measure of disdain.
Group #1 can’t understand how anyone couldn’t just pull their own weight, which is the right thing to do. So they view group #2 with no small measure of disdain.
Therein lies the rub.
Blacks and Hispanics are natural allies in the fight against rule of law. They are joining together to fight for post modernist judicial restoration, which is simply racial preferential treatment in regard to legal jeopardy.
The head of the NAACP in Seattle has recruited a young Hispanic friend of mine to head it’s fight against racial profiling in Seattle, even though her experience is based on treatment in another county.
Judicial restoration will get you about as far as it has gotten Philadelphia. That is on a par with New Orleans for murder statistics.
Based upon my anecdotal experience you are right. The exception seems to be Puerto Ricans who are mostly concentrated in NY and Chicago who assimilate with Blacks. For whatever reason many PR's mimic the language, dress and mannerisms of the black ghetto.
How am I gonna celebrate diversity if my group hugs turn into a WWF cage match? Help me Jesse. Al? Orpah? Geraldo?
Fifty years ago, I found that the Blacks in San Antonio, TX, were puzzled by the Mexicans. They weren’t”white” but the Mexicans tended to think of blacks as dark-skinned Anglos—which is what they were. There was some intermingling but it tended to be trendy stuff, like the zoot-suits affected by Mexicans who borrowed from the jazz culture. But so did some Anglo guys.
ping
Thanks for the links. Disgusting.
The first rule appears to be NEVER factor out the illegals if you want to show how Hispanics are downtrodden in some way. Most Hispanic people I know fit the same profile I do as far as education, socio-economic status, etc. But, if you factor in massive numbers of low skilled illegal aliens, you can make the entire group seem more like...well, low skilled illegal aliens.
susie
He’s renting to illegal aliens?
susie
Strangely, the NAACP represents the Hispanics too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.