They go to other conservatives sites to bash Fred because if they tried it here they get shown the door. They ridicule this site on their threads.
Oh no, its the invasion of the ex-FReepers, they of the lengthy posts and ghoulish graphics.. jveritas, Fair Opinion and now MiaT.(quote from another conservative forum)
This is the reception they get where ever they go.
I don't think the owner of this site thinks that Ron Paul has much of a chance to be the GOP nominee...he believes that Fred Thompson will be the eventual winner...and that is the conventional thinking of most conservatives here. So as long as the Rudy fans are spinning their wheels on Ron Paul he doesn't have to ban them completely for using such tactics on Fred Thompson threads...
And those of us who hold out hope that Ron Paul will catch on with the public as the race progresses don't mind all the attention they bring to our threads. And we don't attack other conservative candidates...unless you consider Rudy to be a conservative.
Jim probably thinks it is all great entertainment.
I hadn't noticed that. Could you be specific, or is this just another Paul supporter spinning conspiracy theories.
What is your name and where is your research?
LOL!
Conservatives support conservatives, not social liberals like Giuliani or moonbat libertarians like Paul.
Hmmm - I'm a Fred supporter, I'm glad the Rudy toots mostly left for pinker pastures, but I have serious problems with Ron Paul as well. His antiwar stance is pathetic. His blaming islamofascism on US foreign policy is worse. His contradiction on supporting how war was authorized against Afghanistan but opposing how war was authorized against Iraq is absurd.
But the final straw was his role as shrimp pimp (among other earmarks).
Tom Coburn is a prinicpled constitutionalist. He doesn't play the earmark game. Coburn walks the walk regarding fiscal restraint and federalism.
Conversely, Ron Paul is a rank hypocrite. He has no constitutional duty to pass along constituent requests for earmarks. His voting against the earmarks is pure chicken****.
So all his posturing as a principled constitutionalist is bull. As are the feeble attempts of his gropies (yeah, I left off the "u") to rationalize such away.