Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Wins Debate but Republicans Won't Gamble on Him
casinogamblingweb.com ^ | Sept 6, 2007 | casinogamblingweb.com

Posted on 09/06/2007 10:52:38 AM PDT by freedomdefender

Ron Paul clearly won the Republican presidential debate last night held in New Hampshire. Viewers were asked to text in their thoughts on who won the debate, Ron Paul received 34%, Giuliani 17%, all others lower. Fred Thompson who did not appear at the debate was clearly the largest loser as his pro-war stance and republican hard line talking points seem to be not what the people are looking for.

Sean Hannity, Fox News pundit, was clearly upset with the results and deliberately ridiculed Congressman Ron Paul. Although outpacing all other candidates by a 2-1 margin, it was clear that Chris Wallace and Brit Hume had tones of sarcasm when talking of Ron Paul. Giving absolutely no credence to Cong. Paul's responses, they even cut off his answer in a heated exchange between Paul and Huckabee, then declaring that Huckabee won the debate on that point.

Ron Paul demonstrated last night that he is the only Republican candidate that gives any thought to issues and his answers, all others gave stock replies and mostly followed the party line.

(Excerpt) Read more at casinogamblingweb.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fantasyisland; gopdebates; howtoirritatepeople; keywordspammers; kooksnnuts; paulbearers; paulbots; paulestinians; paulhaters; paulites; ronnutters; ronpaul; shrimpfest2007; spambots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-395 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2007 10:52:40 AM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Oh give me a break. He did not win the debate; nor is he the only one thinking about the issues.


2 posted on 09/06/2007 10:54:44 AM PDT by freekitty (May the eagles long fly over our beautiful and free American sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
He did not win the debate;

He won the Fox News text poll.

3 posted on 09/06/2007 10:55:51 AM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

The “debate” was worse than worthless, and Hannity’s cackling while Paul was trying to answer was classless and beneath contempt. That being said, don’t believe for a second that Paul supporters didn’t spam that poll. 34%? I think not.


4 posted on 09/06/2007 10:56:12 AM PDT by lesser_satan (FRED THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Viewers were asked to text in their thoughts on who won the debate

***********

I'm guessing that many, many registered voters don't text.

5 posted on 09/06/2007 10:56:41 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Where’s the Hurl Alert?

Ron Paul is an embarrassment to what little dignity the Republican Party still can muster.

6 posted on 09/06/2007 10:56:59 AM PDT by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

I’m guessing that a lot of back-slapping Democrats were texting like mad.


7 posted on 09/06/2007 10:57:44 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

“Ron Paul demonstrated last night that he is the only Republican candidate that gives any thought to issues and his answers...”

What kind of stupidity is that. Yes, Paul has thought about his answers, and so has every other person on that stage. The fact of the matter is that having a foreign policy that is far more similar to Pelosi/Murtha than to GWB is rank lunacy, regardless of how many Paul spammers text into Fox.


8 posted on 09/06/2007 10:58:07 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
Hannity’s cackling while Paul was trying to answer was classless and beneath contempt.

Actually, it showed that Hannity isn't secure in his own positions. He was a cheerleader for invading Iraq, and it's now been shown to be a mistake. Now he's cheerleading for invading Iran - and he doesn't want to be challenged, because he knows there are very strong arguments against such a radical action.

9 posted on 09/06/2007 10:58:09 AM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Ron Paul clearly won the Republican presidential debate last night held in New Hampshire.

LOL!

After last night's debate, I no longer think Ron Paul is a kook. He's a freak.

10 posted on 09/06/2007 10:58:34 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Ron Paul clearly won the Republican presidential debate last night held in New Hampshire.

Fantasy.

11 posted on 09/06/2007 10:58:41 AM PDT by American Quilter (doug from upland--doing the work American journalists won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

How in the hell can Fox News call itself “fair and balanced” after that BS last night? Say what you want about CNN, but their questions didn’t sound like attacks and they never asked questions like “why are you running as a republican, Giuliani” or “are you Al-Qaeda’s candidate, Paul”.


12 posted on 09/06/2007 10:59:00 AM PDT by NapkinUser (Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

This from the studied intellectuals at Casino Gambling Web.com.


13 posted on 09/06/2007 10:59:02 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

“casinogamblingweb.com”

They must be a extremely reputable news source.
I wonder what their views are on nuclear physics and space aliens?


14 posted on 09/06/2007 10:59:10 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

The stoneless Ron Paul got his head handed to him by
Huckabee. If Paul were elected president, bomb shelters
would come back into fashion.


15 posted on 09/06/2007 10:59:12 AM PDT by GiveMeGoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

Was that Hannity who I could hear laughing during the questions to Paul? What sheer unprofessionalism.


16 posted on 09/06/2007 10:59:20 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

“Giuliani, Romney, Tancredo and the others proved last night that they are not free thinkers and are clearly trying to garner the support of Bush’s supportive base.”

You mean they’re *gasp* REPUBLICANS!?!?!? Sweet Jesus, how does a guy this dumb even get a column of his own?


17 posted on 09/06/2007 10:59:37 AM PDT by Dreagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
All this says to me is either that more Ron Paul supporters watched the debate or they were the ones most inclined to participate in the poll.
18 posted on 09/06/2007 10:59:47 AM PDT by DejaJude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Well I guess we found where all that Crack the DEA lost several years ago wound up...


19 posted on 09/06/2007 11:00:31 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The fact of the matter is that having a foreign policy that is far more similar to Pelosi/Murtha than to

Correction: His foreign policy is closer to George Bush as candidate in 2000, when he rejected Clintonian "nation building." Now, Bush is attempting Clintonian "nation building" in Iraq. Hillary supports him - no surprise, since "nation building" is a Democrat/Clintonian concept - while Paul opposes. Paul is closer to the old Bush/old Republican position. He's also closer to the old Republican position on spending and government(he wants less of both; Bush has given us more of both).

20 posted on 09/06/2007 11:00:40 AM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-395 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson