Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
For anyone that things this is ok public attire look again.

See the belt-loops on that thing? Now see where her waist is? (hint it is the narrowest part below her shirt) Now you should also note that the total height of the skirt wait to fringe is the same or less than the distance to her navel from the top of the skirt. She has that thing pulled WAY WAY down. Which means on the plane, taking into account how it is meant to be worn, that shirt was probably 3-5 inches higher.

89 posted on 09/07/2007 9:24:45 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TalonDJ
For anyone that things this is ok public attire look again.

See the belt-loops on that thing? Now see where her waist is? (hint it is the narrowest part below her shirt) Now you should also note that the total height of the skirt wait to fringe is the same or less than the distance to her navel from the top of the skirt. She has that thing pulled WAY WAY down. Which means on the plane, taking into account how it is meant to be worn, that shirt was probably 3-5 inches higher.

Honestly, if I found it that distasteful I wouldn't have looked that close to give the kind of detailed scrutiny that you were able to give on the concerning attire. ; )

115 posted on 09/07/2007 9:39:52 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: TalonDJ

So once she’s seated, where does one’s eyes have to be fixated in order to see something offensive?

Or is a mere glance of flesh now considered offensive?


166 posted on 09/07/2007 10:38:53 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agree with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson