Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islamic Bigotry: The Slaughter of 4,000 Gays
Front Page Mazagine ^ | October 02, 2007 | Robert Spencer

Posted on 10/06/2007 11:30:02 PM PDT by Son of Dis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2007 11:30:06 PM PDT by Son of Dis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Son of Dis

Welcome to FR. What are you’re thoughts about the article you just posted?


2 posted on 10/06/2007 11:39:33 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son of Dis

Why do we not hear of homosexuals protesting Islam?


3 posted on 10/06/2007 11:43:48 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son of Dis

...if I applaud after reading this, am I bigot or an open minded Columbia student?


4 posted on 10/06/2007 11:48:59 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Would seem like alot of folks would think about the impact of having Sharia law around...and its not just Christians in nature.


5 posted on 10/06/2007 11:51:14 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Why do we not hear of homosexuals protesting Islam?

Because the people they entrust to protect their rights don't really care about them or inform them of real threats....their goal is to keep this country divided...bring down our culture and our way of living and bring themselves to more power.

6 posted on 10/06/2007 11:55:39 PM PDT by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Son of Dis
“We don’t have homosexuals like in your country. We don’t have that in our country. We don’t have this phenomenon; I don’t know who’s told you we have it.”

"But we reserve the right to develop some—for self-defense, of course."

7 posted on 10/07/2007 12:02:49 AM PDT by sourcery (Referring a "social conservative" to the Ninth Amendment is like showing the Cross to Dracula.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son of Dis

Do you know any democrats who agree with this muzzie way of dealing with homos? After all, the democrats so desparetly seek to understand them. This is how the “Reality Based Community” feels is the true way to world wide peace. So for democrats to achieve peace with muzzies they must sacrafice their homos to stoning and hanging. Im sure Blackwater and Haliburton would gladly help with this homo issue.


8 posted on 10/07/2007 12:03:28 AM PDT by skimask (Support Terrorism......Vote Democratic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son of Dis

It’s ok, Obama will talk to him.


9 posted on 10/07/2007 12:04:16 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Really something the various constituencies within the Democratican party should keep in mind, as they assail the policies of the Bush Administration in taking the fight to the Islamofacists.

There is absolutely ZERO tolerance in the Islamic world for many of the behaviors that may be frowned upon, but grudgingly permitted, throughout most of “Western” culture. A surprising amount of the taboos that the Muslims abide by have to do with sexual shame, and almost an equal number have to do with diet. The habits taken for granted in most Western cultures (free intermingling of the two sexes, consumption of alcohol, body displays, flaunting of individual lifestyles, some kinds of conspicuous consumption), long considered to be “freedom”, are absolutely forbidden under Islamic rule, and the enforcement of these bans often results in removal of body parts to the point of total mutilation or death. Long imprisonment for even relatively small infractions is not out of the question. This is coupled with torture that would revolt even the most sadistic of Westerners. And WAY beyond anything the US has ever been accused of.

Great wealth, of course, is accorded some flexibility of these rules, but great wealth is not a common state for most individuals in the Islamic world, and most of that is held in tight check by the rules of inheritance and along family lines.


10 posted on 10/07/2007 12:43:11 AM PDT by alloysteel (Ignorance is no handicap for some people in a debate. They just get more shrill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Son of Dis
No homosexuals in Iran

The major point is that he's obviously lying. And, if he's lying about the this issue, then how can I (or anyone else for that matter) believe him in the context of his intentions with Nuclear Energy?

11 posted on 10/07/2007 12:43:30 AM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
"According to the Iranian gay and lesbian rights group Homan..."

Some things can't be made up.

12 posted on 10/07/2007 12:50:28 AM PDT by decal (If at first you don't succeed, blame President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Son of Dis
A contemporary Muslim writer, Shaykh Abdul-Azeez Al-Fawzaan, called homosexuality
“one of the most sinful acts known to humankind” and said that it was “evidence of perverted instincts,
total collapse of shame and honor,
and extreme filthiness of character and soul.”


I've been saying the same thing for over a decade.
If only I was 2000 years old on paper, people might believe me.

13 posted on 10/07/2007 12:57:01 AM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Son of Dis
Happy to see that homosexuals now understand the truth of the threat from islam and are now supporting the war in Iraq.....

...tumbleweeds roll by....

15 posted on 10/07/2007 1:04:56 AM PDT by ScreamingFist (Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ran20

Europe is the perfect test case. Lemmings...


16 posted on 10/07/2007 1:06:21 AM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ran20
Its a big irony. Most conservatives like us on this forum would actually by and large benefit from an Islamic takeover. The useless eaters, homosexuals, entitlement crowd, cheating spouses, divorcers, thieves, womens lib and so on would be in for a world of hurt.

Troll sighting!!

17 posted on 10/07/2007 1:07:44 AM PDT by ChicagoHebrew (Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist

Saddam was secular.

And why weren’t any Wahhabist groups in the “Axis of Evil?”


18 posted on 10/07/2007 1:50:57 AM PDT by Brakeman (Eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brakeman
Saddam was secular.

So what? Regarding the "gay issue" (which is the topic here) he didn't differ from other Islamic regimes. Homosexuals and prostitutes were beheaded in public under Saddam. Secular means crock. Saddam's regime was secular only in the very beginning in the late 1970's/early 1980's. With the war against Iran he promoted Islam for propaganda (Arab Islam vs. heretic Persians). After Desert Storm, Iraq went through a phase known as Islamization. Saddam built mosques, enforced sharia practices and promoted Islam. Of course a lot of this was only for raising his PR status within the Arab world, but the effects on Iraq weren't different.

And why weren’t any Wahhabist groups in the “Axis of Evil?”

Because this axis was confined to states. Including a Wahhabi state would mean Saudi Arabia. Since the Saudi Government is "officially" our "ally", this was a no-brainer. I get your point, and it's a very good one. The problem is that we have no viable alternative to the royals in Saudi Arabia, except Al-Qaeda themselves, short of totally destroying them. But we have to get thougher on Saudi Arabia witout a doubt.

19 posted on 10/07/2007 2:03:55 AM PDT by SolidWood ("I knew my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God and his was an idol.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brakeman
Saddam was secular.

He was an "equal opportunity" murderer. At least the Democrats approve...

20 posted on 10/07/2007 3:30:15 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson