Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/16/2007 12:34:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 10/16/2007 12:35:27 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Biblical archeology is a field in which people of good will, and all religions, can join under the banner of the scientific process.

Try selling that on Temple Mount. The best result is that the Arab Waqf will laugh you off. The worst is that YOU will immediately become an artifact.

4 posted on 10/16/2007 12:44:50 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Berosus; Fred Nerks
I saw that, and saved it somewhere, probably on the iMac before it died. Have the drive though.
Or when you tell them that "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" was a concept expressed in Hammurabi's Law Code nearly 1,000 years before the Bible?
Speaking of the dating of Hammurabi:
Hammurabi and the Revised Chronology
Immanuel Velikovsky
King Hammurabi is the best known of the early monarchs of ancient times due to his famous law code, found inscribed on stone. This great lawgiver of ancient Babylon belonged to the First BabyIonian Dynasty which came to an end, under circumstances shrouded in mystery, some three or four generations after Hammurabi. For the next several centuries, the land was in the domain of a people known as the Kassites... Until a few decades ago, the reign of Hammurabi was dated to around the year 2100 before the present era. This dating was originally prompted by information contained in an inscription of Nabonidus, the last king of Babylon, who reigned in the sixth century... In the foundations of a temple at Larsa, Nabonidus found a plaque of King Burnaburiash. This king is known to us from the el-Amarna correspondence in which he participated. On that plaque Burnaburiash wrote that he had rebuilt the temple erected seven hundred years before by King Hammurabi... When Egyptologists found it necessary to reduce the el-Amarna Age by a quarter of a century, the time of Hammurabi was adjusted accordingly... The period of Hammurabi also served as a landmark for the histories of the Middle East from Elam to Syria, and was used as a guide for the chronological tables of other nations... A connecting link was actually found between the First Babylonian Dynasty and the Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt, the great dynasty of the Middle Kingdom. At Platanos on Crete, a seal of the Hammurabi type was discovered in a tomb together with Middle Minoan pottery of a kind associated at other sites with objects of the Twelfth Egyptian Dynasty, more exactly, of its earlier part... At Mari on the central Euphrates... a cuneiform tablet was found which established that Hammurabi of Babylonia and King Shamshi-Adad I of Assyria were contemporaries... Shamshi-Adad I could not have reigned in the twenty-first century since there exist lists of Assyrian kings which enable us to compute regnal dates... By adding to the last year the sum of the regnal years, as given in the list of the kings from Shamshi-Adad to Assur-Nerari, the first year of Shamshi-Adad is calculated to have been -1726 and his last year -1694... The realization that the dating of Hammurabi must be brought forward by three and a half centuries created "a puzzling chronological discrepancy", which could only be resolved by making Hammurabi later than Amenemhet I of the Twelfth Dynasty... If Hammurabi reigned at the time allotted to him by the finds at Mari and Khorsabad -- but according to the finds at Platanos was a contemporary of the Egyptian kings of the early Twelfth Dynasty -- then that dynasty must have started at a time when, according to the accepted chronology, it had already come to its end.

5 posted on 10/16/2007 12:50:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

My favorite screed of this type was the review years ago, I think it was in Archaeology magazine, "a publication of the Archaeological Institute of America", of a book by Barry Fell, in which the reviewer referred to the book as "a candidate for burning".
6 posted on 10/16/2007 12:53:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; ...
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

7 posted on 10/16/2007 12:54:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks Blam.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.

The quarterly FReepathon is underway.
GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


8 posted on 10/16/2007 12:58:29 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

A pantload of hand-wringing by someone who feels his authority is threatened.

As long as amateurs can dig up old stuff, professional old stuff digger-uppers will have to deal with it.


9 posted on 10/16/2007 1:09:06 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Somebody get this man a diaper.


13 posted on 10/16/2007 1:37:55 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

pinging


14 posted on 10/16/2007 1:44:12 PM PDT by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Interesting to me that collective human memory seems to fail at about 300 years. I have a hunch that about 500 years from now, scholars will be debating whether Washington or Jefferson was America’s first real president and whether John Adams existed at all! And, no doubt, those researchers will be well funded in their search! lol


16 posted on 10/16/2007 2:53:47 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

ping


21 posted on 10/16/2007 4:41:23 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
ut much more common is a vast and echoing silence reminiscent of the early days of the debate over "intelligent design," when biologists were reluctant to respond to the neocreationist challenge

...aaaaand there he loses me.

It's so funny, FReepers have contempt for the "Trust The Experts" line everywhere but here.

26 posted on 10/17/2007 8:43:58 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

read


27 posted on 10/17/2007 8:45:31 AM PDT by sauropod ("Nobody has time for your priceless prose. Get to the point." - Jim Michaels RIP 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson