Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LIFE
Free Republic post ^ | 10/20/2007 | by ex-snook

Posted on 10/20/2007 2:08:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

"I speak for at least half the people here, including the Founder Jim Robinson, who has stated he will not vote for Giuliani under any circumstance."

Agree.

NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LIFE

Don't Cut and Run, vote pro-life every time. It's the way you always win.

‘We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life — the unborn — without diminishing the value of all human life.’ —Ronald Reagan


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; elections; electionsgiuliani; giuliani; moralabsolutes; prolife; rudy; wordup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,461-1,465 next last
To: stephenjohnbanker
Rooty has no intention of appointing conservatives to the SCOTUS.

Roody Doody says he would have no litmus test when he appoints "Constructionist judges". Isn't that a litmus test in and of itself? Furthermore, does Roody Doody even understand a real Constructionist judge would find Roe to be bad law and therefor it should absolutely be part of a litmus test?

I believe his stated intentions are nothing more than a charade.

261 posted on 10/20/2007 4:24:42 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW! ®™ ± ‰¢ ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
we will be held accountable.

Of course we will,I agree,now what do we do to right a wrong.

262 posted on 10/20/2007 4:25:11 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Things too boring for you over at WA? Why are you back here promoting Rooty Tooty again? Conservatives here aren’t interested in what you’re peddlin. Thought you knew that by now.


263 posted on 10/20/2007 4:25:31 PM PDT by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense? Don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: mike h

Not asking you stay home. Just stating some facts. Like Rooty is no conservative.

In the end, most conservatives will back Fred. First he takes down Rooty, then he’ll take down Hillary.

Sounds like a good conservative plan to me.

We win, they lose.


264 posted on 10/20/2007 4:26:39 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
What a selfish rat you are. A dem Congress (and we will be losing seats this election) and a Hillary president?

How can you hope that Rudy wins the nomination with the risk that AFTER he wins the nomination, the Hillary forces will expose some ugly truths about him and his background? What makes you think he's completely straight if you get my drift?

265 posted on 10/20/2007 4:26:47 PM PDT by tear gas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: dmw

Don’t you like a little healthy debate...don’t you get bored telling each other how great, moral and smart you all are?


266 posted on 10/20/2007 4:27:16 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
..and this is why I wanted to be part of Free Republic.
Thanks Jim Robinson!
267 posted on 10/20/2007 4:27:31 PM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter...President '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: tear gas

Do you really expect to be taken seriously saying something like that? Don’t bother wasting my time.


268 posted on 10/20/2007 4:28:20 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

“This is not 1980. WE ARE A DIFFERENT COUNTRY...you can keep your head in the sand..but we are not the majority. The difference between me and you is that I understand that.”

Rudy

1) Pro abortion
2) Gun grabber
3) Appointed liberal Dems to the courts
4) Open borders

I would sooner vote for Al Capone. Fortunately, I believe Rudy will fade fairly quickly once things get moving. Dukakis tried to run as a moderate, and he was exposed as a Marxist.


269 posted on 10/20/2007 4:28:25 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
"This is not 1980. WE ARE A DIFFERENT COUNTRY"

Si, yo comprendo.

"we are not the majority"

Nah, conservatives still the majority. And if another Reagan-like candidate ever again surfaces and the circumstances are favorable (like they were after four years of a disastrous Carter admin.) he could win in another landslide.

Not in this upcoming election, though. It'll probably be yet another close call. ...no matter who wins the GOP nomination. And it won't be Rudy, imo.

270 posted on 10/20/2007 4:28:40 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo (My other Telecaster is a Thinline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Why would people here, who say they love their country, give that chance to Hillary? They know there’s a chance that could happen...but they don’t care. It makes me really mad...and frightened.


271 posted on 10/20/2007 4:30:16 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
No, it’s all over if Hillary wins the WH. Amnesty will pass, there’s millions of Democrat Party voters to secure their dominance for a hundred years.

I think that's part of the lesson we are to learn

272 posted on 10/20/2007 4:30:36 PM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The abortionist who reassembles the arms and legs of a tiny baby to make sure all its parts have been torn from its mother's body can hardly doubt whether it is a human being. - Ronald Reagan
273 posted on 10/20/2007 4:31:08 PM PDT by deaconjim (Because He lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Spoken like a true abortionist.


274 posted on 10/20/2007 4:32:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

That’s what I mean. You’re asking everybody else to just take that risk. Don’t you think he should at least make some assurances and commitments about his past before being nominated? What harm would there be in his saying that despite all the cross-dressing, he is and always has been completely straight?


275 posted on 10/20/2007 4:32:28 PM PDT by tear gas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Lazarus Longer
Nah, conservatives still the majority.

Oh, ok..if you say so.

276 posted on 10/20/2007 4:32:46 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
But who did he appoint to SCOTUS? Was it not Kennedy and O'Connor? He actually did nothing for pro-life causes once he was elected. The two SCOTUS appointments did not vote to terminate abortions or abortion issues in any way.

Or have you forgotten this?

"...In 1992, Kennedy joined O'Connor and David Souter to form the troika who delivered the plurality opinion in the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which re-affirmed in principle (though not in many details) the Roe v. Wade decision recognizing the right to abortion under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (Kennedy voted to uphold the restrictions on abortion at issue and considered going as far as to overturn Roe but switched that aspect of his vote during the consideration of Casey).[4] The plurality opinion, signed jointly by three justices appointed by the anti-Roe presidential administrations of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, ignited a firestorm of criticism from conservatives. Kennedy, however, dissented in the 2000 decision of Stenberg v. Carhart, which struck down laws criminalizing partial-birth abortion.

277 posted on 10/20/2007 4:32:50 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

The 2008 Presidential election will be DECIDED at the GOP primary.

The GOP primary IS the election.


278 posted on 10/20/2007 4:33:16 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: navyblue; RasterMaster; Reagan Man; stephenjohnbanker
The disastrous Hannity interview is another Rooty/Jooty debacle, so archly orchestrated, it was almost unwatchable.

Should have been promoted as an infomercial-----Hannity was a perfect shill to pitch a number to call in campaign contributions.

Rooty's campaign is in emergency mode b/c the polls apparently show Jooty is a drag on the campaign; on ABC's 20/20, this nitwit actually told an appalled America she planned to sit in on Cabinet meetings. Now Rooty and Jooty are stupidly laughing over the very crackbrained idea they themselves came up with.

Talk about voter manipulation----the Hannity interview was hyped as Rooty's Hillary-bashing---to inveigle viewers to watch. From the getgo, the entire exercise was intended to whitewash Rooty's biggest problem---his third wife---Jooty. Rooty dumped his wife and kids to be with Jooty who abandoned her only child to be with the married Mayor.

Jooty had been instructed to act like the demure worshipful Stepford wife. All she needed was a ruffled gingham frock to complete the masquerade. Jooty had dutifully memorized all her answers to questions which Sean read verbatim from a cheat sheet.

Hannity was well-briefed to ask the "right" questions and Rooty/Jooty responded like Pavlov's dogs. Sean was coached to get answers that were obviously focus-grouped to the nth degree.

Rooty's attempts to look "sincere" were laughable. Posturing, slitting his eyes to look serious---all of them laughing at the dumbness---the NRA phone thing AND the idiotic Cabinet interview w/ Bwabwa Walters. Sean should hang his head in shame for giving Rooty TV time----not b/c it was effective---but b/c it was a witless attempt to resurrect Jooty.

Viewers have never been so manipulated as they were in this interview. Sean should be ashamed for using his audience in that manner.

Hannity asked not one question about Jooty's puppy killing career---he looked the other way when Jooty touted herself as a "top national manager" at US Surgical (let's contact her co-workers about that, eh?).

The entire interview was promoted as Rooty's Hillary basher---when all that was intended was to resurrect Jooty from the 20/20 Cabinet disaster, puppy killing, Jooty breaking up his marriage, and "forgetting" she had a first husband.

279 posted on 10/20/2007 4:33:19 PM PDT by Liz (Rooty's not getting my guns or the name of my hairdresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Agreed. There is no reason to think Rudy would appoint good judges to the SCOTUS. It’s just more lies from the Rudy clan.


280 posted on 10/20/2007 4:33:23 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,461-1,465 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson