Interesting article from a liberal magazine (though the author, a professor at the University of Kentucky, has also made this argument in conservative circles as well). Though I don't necessarily want to see USAF abolished wholesale, I think we'd be better served if the Department of the Air Force was abolished and USAF was tied to the hip of the Army in the same manner that the Marine Corps is part of a sharply focused seapower force with the Navy, and subordinate to it. To a man, my Army friends, past and present, think USAF does a lousy job of air support in ground combat situations because they think the mission isn't sexy enough.
1 posted on
11/02/2007 1:36:50 PM PDT by
DesScorp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: DesScorp
Let’s abolish DOE, OSHA, FEMA, ATF, COE, staffers for congressrats, (along with free haircuts, lunches, retirement programs and expense money as well!)
2 posted on
11/02/2007 1:39:49 PM PDT by
fweingart
(FRED! (How is Mumia Abu-Jamal these days?))
To: DesScorp
well, everybody knows the air farce is not the real military......
3 posted on
11/02/2007 1:40:27 PM PDT by
joe fonebone
(When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout)
To: DesScorp
They’d be more useful if we would LET THEM BOMB THE CRAP OUT OF OUR ENEMIES. Apparantly that is no longer pc./sarc
4 posted on
11/02/2007 1:41:49 PM PDT by
snippy_about_it
(Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul. WWPD (what would Patton do))
To: DesScorp
Abolish the Air Force, get UFOs instead.
5 posted on
11/02/2007 1:42:00 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: DesScorp
I’m not going to read this left-wing crap. What an ungrateful, anti-military whackjob this “guy” is.
6 posted on
11/02/2007 1:43:15 PM PDT by
darkangel82
(And the band played on....)
To: DesScorp
7 posted on
11/02/2007 1:44:13 PM PDT by
Vision
(" 'Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit,' says the Lord Almighty." Zechariah 4:6)
To: DesScorp
All branches serve a purpose; I would be more concerned that they adapt to the times (here and in the future).
To: DesScorp
9 posted on
11/02/2007 1:45:32 PM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: DesScorp
Hey! We need our brothers in blue and gray cammo. Who else could gas up the ground pounder’s UAV’s in the future?
10 posted on
11/02/2007 1:46:08 PM PDT by
llevrok
(Born a ham and never cured.)
To: DesScorp
But what about all of the nice golf courses?
12 posted on
11/02/2007 1:46:44 PM PDT by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
To: DesScorp
As a former combat infantryman I have a deep and lasting appreciation for the guys in the "Big Blue Wrecking Crew". The next most beautiful picture to me, after my wife and kids, is the image of an F4 in a close air support Napalm drop. No body can bring hurt in an enemy like they can!
The problem today is not with the Air Force, but with the policy makers. When you park the B52's you are telling the enemy and the world that there are things more important to you than military victory. More rubble means less trouble.
To: DesScorp
I respectfully disagree. While the current enemy may not require a well-trained, well-equipped Air Force, tomorrow’s may be another story.
This kind of short-sightedness ALWAYS gets us in to trouble. If we had not down-sized air defense as part of the “peace dividend” at the close of the Cold War, 9-11 might not have been so tragically effective.
14 posted on
11/02/2007 1:47:21 PM PDT by
ODC-GIRL
(Proudly serving our Nation's Homeland Defense)
To: JRios1968
15 posted on
11/02/2007 1:47:36 PM PDT by
FredHead47
(KIMI = World Champion 2007)
To: zot
16 posted on
11/02/2007 1:47:53 PM PDT by
GreyFriar
( 3rd Armored Division - Spearhead)
To: DesScorp
We have the Iran fight coming up and there are advocates for “boots on the ground” as being sufficient? or eeven a large component? We do not have and do not have the prospect of having sufficient boots for this concept to be viable beyond specialized applications.
17 posted on
11/02/2007 1:48:16 PM PDT by
arthurus
To: DesScorp
Well... the air arm had been part of the U.S. Army until the National Defense Act of 1947. Reintegrating the Air Force into the Army is a good idea, IMHO.
Of course, the AmPros lefty who wrote this wants to ultimately abolish the entire American military (how `sixties’ of him), so I say,
Chuck you, Farley!
;^)
To: DesScorp
In the upcoming war with Iran, the AirForce and Navy, both so often deemed unnescessairy for the WoT, will do the lions share of fighting.
20 posted on
11/02/2007 1:50:05 PM PDT by
SolidWood
("I knew my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God and his was an idol.")
To: DesScorp
Great idea.
We have the world's most capable Air Force. Let's scrap it!
What an idiot.
23 posted on
11/02/2007 1:51:17 PM PDT by
SIDENET
(Hubba Hubba...)
To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!
Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
24 posted on
11/02/2007 1:51:28 PM PDT by
magslinger
(cranky right-winger)
To: DesScorp
I will respectfully disagree with this article.
All branches serve a purpose.
There is plenty of pork we could cut in the halls of Congress.
Leave the military ALONE.
25 posted on
11/02/2007 1:51:44 PM PDT by
TheWriterTX
(Proud Retrosexual Wife of 14 Years)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson