Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: restornu

The woman has repeatedly revealed who she is, ever since she was First Lady. When are those who support her going to realize the kind of person they’re supporting? It will give me great joy to see her not receive the Dem nomination. [I have faith.]


2 posted on 11/10/2007 7:37:46 AM PST by Clara Lou (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou

I hope you are right. Even tho she is most likely beatable in November (if the Republicans keep their ducks in a row and behave like men and not weenies) it would give me great joy to see her LOSE in her own party.

ANd then with any kind of luck the Clintons will fade quietly out of national politics and we won;t have to look at their faces ever again.

I wish.


7 posted on 11/10/2007 7:42:03 AM PST by SusaninOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

I’m asking the same frustrated question as you.

Allow me to add another question.....This is campaigning 101. You take the candidate to a restaurant...YOU LEAVE A TIP!

Didn’t this happen one time before?

And that campaign continues to make this most horrific of gaffes.

We need some Republican operatives to get on this. If this was a Republican that left some poor waitress nothing, and then LIED about it...Jame Carville would be serpent-heading all over the TV spitting and hissing about rich Republicans and their divorce from the common people. Various Dem spokespeople would be on all the cable shows, explaining to the soccer moms why Republicans can’t even be trusted to tip a humble waitress. Move-on.org would have cartoons of nasty Republicans beating on innocent waitresses.

This is really a serious gaffe, the kind the ladies at the beauty parlor would understand quite well. Most all of us have waiters or waitresses in our families and many of us have been one as well. It’s something that will resonate with the common people.

Yet the pubbies are too “polite” to bring it on.


17 posted on 11/10/2007 7:46:02 AM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou; restornu; 43north; martinidon; SusaninOhio; mtbopfuyn; georgiagirl_pam; Snardius

Queen Lucy ... er ... Hillary understands that
to serve her royal thighness is gratuity enough.

Duh!


21 posted on 11/10/2007 7:47:34 AM PST by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
This photo was taken 11/8/07. Hill looks a bit tired. I guess the campaigning is getting to her.


31 posted on 11/10/2007 7:59:44 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

Hillary is a dead lock cinch to get the nomination. This isn’t going to change it.


41 posted on 11/10/2007 8:03:50 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

I hope she gets the Dem nomination and then gets shellacked in the General Election. That would take the wind out of her sails. Arrogant b!itch.


72 posted on 11/10/2007 8:31:24 AM PST by Newfy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

Actually I think she is the most beatable Democrat that could get the nomination. On the other hand If Giuliani is the Republican nominee then the Press is going to go wall-to-wall with Giuliani character and scandals until November and her election becomes much more likely.


82 posted on 11/10/2007 8:44:08 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
It will give me great joy to see her not receive the Dem nomination. [I have faith.]

I'm kind of torn on this one. On the one hand, I would like to see her not be nominated, I would rub my hands with glee. OTOH, I think she would be the easiest candidate to beat in the general election. I just can't imagine any man (outside of the nancy-boy types living SF, NY etc.)voting for her.
87 posted on 11/10/2007 8:48:31 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

It’s the little things that tell you all you need to know about somebody.


99 posted on 11/10/2007 9:34:39 AM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

A Clinton will lie, even when he/she doesn’t need to. It’s what they are.


112 posted on 11/10/2007 10:12:12 AM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou

[It will give me great joy to see her not receive the Dem nomination. [I have faith.]]

Of course you realize that if she doesn’t get the bid, it will go to Obama. Any negatives about him will be met with SHRILL calls of racism.

Republicans will be shamed into voting for him or forever carry the stigma of the “RACIST” party. Go hillary. I would rather beat her (easy enough, I believe) than fight a cow-towing press.


119 posted on 11/10/2007 10:40:40 AM PST by dbacks (Taglines for sale or rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson