Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Meet the women who won't have babies--because they're not so eco friendly"
Daily Mail ^ | Nov. 21, 2007 | Natasha Courtenay Smith and Morag Turner

Posted on 11/23/2007 4:50:44 AM PST by steadfastconservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: reagan_fanatic
There are monsters among us.

and we know who inspires them...

I looked at the comments on the article ...only one out of 30....a lady in Australia lamented the abortion aspect

61 posted on 11/23/2007 10:28:35 AM PST by wardaddy (This country is being destroyed by folks who could have never created it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Mass psychosis, that's the only plausible explanation.

and no ergot mold to blame this time

62 posted on 11/23/2007 10:30:09 AM PST by wardaddy (This country is being destroyed by folks who could have never created it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: steve in DC

that needs saying again:

“If you are not propagating the species, then you are really sponging up resources to no productive end.

It is only for your personal, hedonistic pleasures that you continue to exist.”

these folks would hate a mass procreater like me and my wife and some of my recent ancestors....I love having children more than anything....well...maybe there is one exception but it’s part of the same equation


63 posted on 11/23/2007 10:36:27 AM PST by wardaddy (This country is being destroyed by folks who could have never created it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

every once in a while i like to delve into the liberal mindset, if for only a few minutes. it really helps when trying to understand where they come from. but staying there too long could permanently damage you.
something tells me they won’t worry about the points you bring up, because in their mind their behavior is already offset by having reduced the carbon output of their unborn baby. for example, to that ecobroad, whatever she does is justified because her lifetime carbon output has been paid for by preventing another lifetime of carbon output.
i hope she realizes the error of her ways. when she does, i hope she doesn’t kill herself immediately, but starts some sort of eco-campaign to raise eco-awareness of the eco-danger of this eco-midset.


64 posted on 11/23/2007 10:57:08 AM PST by Disciplinemisanthropy (...and that, people, is what grinds my gears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

eco nutcases ping


65 posted on 11/23/2007 11:15:52 AM PST by I Drive Too Fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Let me amend that comment to say “couples who are childless by choice.”


66 posted on 11/23/2007 12:36:50 PM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

Think of it as evolution in action.


67 posted on 11/24/2007 4:24:04 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Of course, they say exactly the saame thing about conservatives. ;-)


68 posted on 11/24/2007 9:21:38 PM PST by Captain Rhino ( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson