Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Meet the women who won't have babies--because they're not so eco friendly"
Daily Mail ^ | Nov. 21, 2007 | Natasha Courtenay Smith and Morag Turner

Posted on 11/23/2007 4:50:44 AM PST by steadfastconservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
The title of the newspaper article should have read: "Idiots who believe that people are pollution--thank heaven, they are not reproducing!"

What the couples in this story don't realize is that it is the people who have children, who will determine the direction that the culture takes in the future and that when childless couples die, their beliefs die with them. Which is good.

1 posted on 11/23/2007 4:50:47 AM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

Why can’t this be a muslim belief?


2 posted on 11/23/2007 4:53:07 AM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

More Liberal insanity.

Liberalism is a mental disorder. So many of them simply have never been taught how to think.


3 posted on 11/23/2007 4:53:40 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

it’s like gays, they recruit


4 posted on 11/23/2007 4:54:19 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

It’s interesting that, in our contemporary society, people who are obviously insane are treated as if they were of sound mind.


5 posted on 11/23/2007 4:54:38 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperman

If only her mother would have had an abortion. All would be well in her wacko world.


6 posted on 11/23/2007 4:55:25 AM PST by RetiredArmy (If Marxist's Dimocrat Party & the Fed Gov want my guns, COME AND TRY TO GET THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Maybe she and her husband should just off themselves. Or, is the root of the problem that they are just plain selfish?


7 posted on 11/23/2007 4:57:14 AM PST by NewHampshireDuo (Earth - Taking care of itself since 4.6 billion BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Somehow I doubt if this woman would ever admit that her mother had every right to have an abortion and that it would have been a good thing for the planet if she had done so.


8 posted on 11/23/2007 4:58:56 AM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Yup. Just like all these liberal pigs who complain about the world being over populated and that mankind should be culled out or something. I offer they should begin by killing themselves and assisting the green world view. But, you know liberals, all this stuff is good for US to do, not THEM.


9 posted on 11/23/2007 4:58:57 AM PST by RetiredArmy (If Marxist's Dimocrat Party & the Fed Gov want my guns, COME AND TRY TO GET THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

A little chlorine in the gene pool every now and then is not a bad thing.


10 posted on 11/23/2007 5:00:56 AM PST by Coastie ("You gotta go out, you don't have to come back"- CG motto (unofficial))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperman
LOL a mental disorder indeed.
11 posted on 11/23/2007 5:01:41 AM PST by Archon of the East (Universal Executive Power of the Law of Nature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

These types of people feel so morally superior to the rest of us. They worship Al Gore and carbon footprints the way other people go to church and worship God.

She’s a hypocrite because she will feel entitled someday to getting her social security and government benefits, or whatever the British equivalent is. And those benefits will be paid for by somebody else’s children.


12 posted on 11/23/2007 5:01:55 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative
Ayn Rand wrote about people like this woman. She has made a choice between life and death--a choice only humans can make.

Her only logical flaw is that she has failed to follow her passion for death to its logical conclusion--suicide.

Her notion that each new person is a net cost to society and the planet is true--under socialism.

Under capitalism each person is a valuable asset to all of us.

That is why each loss of economic liberty to government control is a vote for human suffering and death.

In the "mixed economy" of today it is understandable that she is confused whether life or death should be a value.

She is not insane in my view--she is merely too stupid to understand her political and economic environment and too emotional to make a serious attempt to face the meaning of her decision.


13 posted on 11/23/2007 5:06:26 AM PST by cgbg (The fight has just begun against the bully (nanny) state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Let’s just be thankful that she is ending that gene pool. She is doing the rest of us a favor. </sarcasm>

Actually, it’s quite scary that there are people who would go to the lengths this woman would. Rational people believe that she will one day “see the light”. I doubt it. She has now committed herself to a path of (self-defined, and lack of a better term) “righteousness” that she can ill afford to betray.

Such is her insanity that she will continue the charade, regardless of any doubts, because her belief in her own “Self-righteousness” is so strong, that to admit she is wrong is to admit that she is not perfect.

Selfish would seem to apply as much, if not more, to her.

or at least, self-centered.


14 posted on 11/23/2007 5:07:19 AM PST by RangerM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

Now Thank We All Our God... that these churls do not spawn.


15 posted on 11/23/2007 5:09:02 AM PST by Dr. Thorne (Compromise on your vote and you get a compromised government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
She is not insane in my view--she is merely too stupid to understand her political and economic environment and too emotional to make a serious attempt to face the meaning of her decision.

With her outlook I think it is great she will not reproduce.

16 posted on 11/23/2007 5:15:24 AM PST by TYVets (God so loved the world he didn't send a committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Very astute reply.


17 posted on 11/23/2007 5:16:33 AM PST by Misschuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
She’s a hypocrite because she will feel entitled someday to getting her social security and government benefits, or whatever the British equivalent is. And those benefits will be paid for by somebody else’s children.

Well said. These women are hypocrites in a number of ways.

(1) Each of them, living in the UK, have a "carbon footprint" far, far, far larger than a family of six in India, say. But neither of them would ever dream of consciously and intentionally living in poverty in order to live up to their ideals.

(2) They say that it is selfish to have children, but one of them claims to love other people's children. People do not love children when they consider children to be an immoral and selfish burden on the planet.

(3) If their goal is the reduction of the number of human beings on the planet, they are hypocrites for not committing suicide. That is obviously the most direct and foolproof method of reducing the human population they believe is poisoning the earth.

(4) Plenty of gung-ho environmentalists have children. So these women can give whatever rationalization they want for not having children - it is automatically hollow.

(5) When they are elderly, as you pointed out, they will have no children to look after them. As a result, they will become a responsibility of the state and therefore of other people's children. Not only that, but the state is the least efficient caregiver possible for the elderly - if these women and their spouses (can't really call them husbands) live as long as they are expected to, they will spend thirty years living off other people's taxes and labor.

18 posted on 11/23/2007 5:16:42 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

I can hardly wait until this idiot hits the nursing home circuit. They may not change her for weeks. She won’t have children to see that she is not abused. Even now, you see these old women that nobody visits. This lady subscribes to the liberal mantra “killing the culture, one abortion at a time”..


19 posted on 11/23/2007 5:18:52 AM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

The Muslims must cheer when they read stories like this.


20 posted on 11/23/2007 5:19:02 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson