Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Meet the women who won't have babies--because they're not so eco friendly"
Daily Mail ^ | Nov. 21, 2007 | Natasha Courtenay Smith and Morag Turner

Posted on 11/23/2007 4:50:44 AM PST by steadfastconservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: metmom

Her Mum and Dad must be so proud! And so happy they don’t have to enjoy grandchildren. What a waste of time that would be.


41 posted on 11/23/2007 6:21:06 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

They should off themselves and complete the job.


42 posted on 11/23/2007 6:25:42 AM PST by junta (It's Poltical Correctness stupid! Hold liberals accountable for their actions, a new idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I don’t think that she is insane or stupid. She is selfish and she is rationalizing that selfishness by claiming that her choice is good for the environment. She is denying to others the goods of the earth, the good of life, which she herself enjoys.


43 posted on 11/23/2007 6:27:27 AM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

thanks for the thanksgiving puke!!!!


44 posted on 11/23/2007 6:31:45 AM PST by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative
"In short, we do everything we can to reduce our carbon footprint. ... It would be morally wrong for me to add to climate change and the destruction of Earth."

Just imagine all the Earth destroying power that went into publishing this particular story in print and on the Internet. Thousands of acts were set in motion when the subjects of this story agreed to blab a little bit about their moronic outlook on life. Trees were killed so that this story could be printed. Fuel was burned at various points along the way. Energy was consumed. Even now, as we all sit in our homes, we are the hapless victims/accomplices of these so called eco-friendly citizens. The doomsday clock just clicked another few seconds ahead, thanks to these selfish rat-bastards. I hope they can live with that.

:P

45 posted on 11/23/2007 6:49:43 AM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

Darwinism at work. Methinks we don’t want her offspring around....more welfare mouths to feed. Why welfare? That kind of thinking shows the signs of a future English major....who will publish in the Journal of Modern Languages and have no source of income save for some “university” taking our taxes and burning the money. Sheesh.....give her the abortion now!!


46 posted on 11/23/2007 7:04:41 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Two nincompoops who believe the tired old lefty nonsense about there being too many people and too few resources, have elected to commit genetic suicide. Best news I’ve had all day.

In a way, that's true. Unfortunately for us, as confirmed fanatics, they will relentlessly crusade to force their insane views on us for the rest of their miserable, twisted lives.

These are now totalitarian activists who will never, ever stop in their quest to validate their own eco-fascist pathologies by making the rest of us adhere to them. They have cut off their noses to spite their faces and they will make the rest of us do the same if they can accomplish it.

47 posted on 11/23/2007 8:11:46 AM PST by Gritty (The right to have children should be a marketable commodity, limited by the state-Kenneth Boulding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
re #25?
You can bet your bottom dollar.

...not with a turkey baster.

48 posted on 11/23/2007 8:14:48 AM PST by Landru (Reality hits the faithful the hardest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RangerM
Selfish and ungrateful.

Whether you follow a particular religion or are an atheist, it is an undeniable fact that it took a heck of a lot of effort to pass the spark of life, the primordial life force, or what ever you care to call it, on to you. It is an act of supreme ingratitude all the way back to the very beginning of your line of predecessors (human and/or otherwise) to say you have so little regard for this most precious gift, that you don’t want to pass it on to at least one person in the next generation.

Further, the effort required to responsibly conceive, care for, and guide children to adulthood is, in my opinion, perhaps the key experience that helps develop a sense of generosity and compassion in individual human beings. It also provides a transcendent shared common experience that can act as a basis for interaction among what are otherwise highly diverse peoples and cultures.

This is not an argument for high birthrates or for compulsory parenthood. There are clearly persons who have no business becoming parents. There is, arguably, a point where a family or a nation can have severe problems with having too many children (just as it can with too few children being born). The acknowledged “no net growth rate” for reproduction at the societal level is 2.1 children per woman (split almost evenly between males and females at birth). Obviously, this woman’s lack of participation (and any others like her) will be offset by women who have three or more children. However, when there are too many women having too few babies (as is currently the case in western Europe, Russia, and Japan), you get population contraction which can have devastating military, political, economic, and environmental effects on society.

There is some truth in the argument that the deliberately childless, especially those who decide to take that stance for ecological reasons, should go ahead and commit suicide. They continue to consume resources as long as they are alive. Very few of them (like the rest of us) are likely to live lives of such outstanding merit that it can justify their continued burden on the earth (poor, poor Mother Earth). This is especially true after middle age when they begin to consume resources in greater amounts than they themselves can offset by their own productive efforts. At that point, they become parasites. Now, if they had children and grand children, they could claim that their continued resource needs are offset by the surplus in the productive efforts of their descendants.

Of course, I don’t personally believe in or endorse this suicide argument because it is an affront to Almighty God, the creator and sustainer of all.

49 posted on 11/23/2007 8:16:42 AM PST by Captain Rhino ( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative
and that when childless couples die, their beliefs die with them. Which is good.

Real nice. Some people can't have kids you know.

50 posted on 11/23/2007 8:20:21 AM PST by Fawn (http://www.brightlion.com/InHope/InHope_en.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative
"Having children is selfish. It's all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet," says Toni, 35.

And when these a-holes retire they will no doubt refuse all Medicare, Social Security, any other government funded benefits, to avoid living off the labors of other people's children. Right. Talk about selfish.

51 posted on 11/23/2007 8:23:20 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative
"Having children is selfish."

I think it's the other way around, Einstein.

52 posted on 11/23/2007 8:26:28 AM PST by Cinnamon Girl (OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
So many of them simply have never been taught how to think.

Actually that seems to be true. If they think at all, it is in sound bites and cliches, not rational trains of thought that start with a question and lead to an answer. Instead they absorb pre-programmed answers and then apply them rather indiscriminately to questions.

53 posted on 11/23/2007 8:26:34 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

It would be a really good idea to spread this belief in all the countries of the middle east and africa.


54 posted on 11/23/2007 8:32:43 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino

As an only child, I can say one my life’s regrets will be that I didn’t have a sibling.

There is no one that I share genetics or upbringing, and it leaves me with a feeling of being “cut off”.

I have no anger towards my parents, as I know they thought that it was best. (My father actually wanted no children, but agreed to one.)

I now have a 5yo daughter, and another due next month. Don’t know if we’ll have anymore or not, since we are both in our upper ‘30s.

IMO, the greatest gift to my daughter will be a little sister, and vice versa.


55 posted on 11/23/2007 8:45:58 AM PST by RangerM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

Natural selection in real time.


56 posted on 11/23/2007 9:13:12 AM PST by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

I think it’s a wonderful thing. She will not reproduce creating more idiots like herself. She takes herself out of the gene pool. Now if only she can create a movement of like idiots.


57 posted on 11/23/2007 9:18:40 AM PST by A. Patriot (CZ 52's ROCK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

“We feel we can have one long-haul flight a year, as we are vegan and childless, thereby greatly reducing our carbon footprint and combating over-population.”

If she was as breathless as she sounds, she could eliminate her carbon footprint altogether.


58 posted on 11/23/2007 9:51:46 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Who do you suppose paid for the abortion and sterilization?


59 posted on 11/23/2007 9:52:58 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

Why don’t they do the right thing and just kill themselves...the ultimate sacrifice

easy to abort a baby....the baby had no say.

cowards and fools....sick.....and way too many of them

they can all off themselves and save an army of carbon effin footprints

i have yet to meet any hardcore lefties who are not mentally ill and incredibly messed up with low self esteem and malignant narcissim...the usual lib paradox of personality

The New Gods.....Environmentalism and Sensitivity to Bigotry and Racism


60 posted on 11/23/2007 10:24:24 AM PST by wardaddy (This country is being destroyed by folks who could have never created it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson