Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six candidates to participate in historic 2008 S.C. GOP Presidential Candidates Debate (No Hunter)
SC GOP ^ | 1/9/08 | Staff

Posted on 01/09/2008 11:47:11 AM PST by pissant

Contact: Rob Godfrey, Communications Director 803.807.7144

COLUMBIA, S.C. - Excitement surrounding presidential politics in South Carolina continues to grow as South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Katon Dawson today announced that invitations have been extended to and accepted by six Republican presidential candidates to participate in the 2008 South Republican Party Presidential Candidates Debate in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

"The stakes couldn't be higher this election, and we couldn't be more excited to extend a warm South Carolina welcome to six White House hopefuls who are seeking the Republican nomination to be the next President of the United States," said Dawson. "These candidates join tens of thousands of Republicans from across the country and hundreds of journalists from around the world who are converging on Myrtle Beach for this debate because they know the 2008 election could be decided on our stage that night."

The following candidates will be receiving formal invitations from the South Carolina Republican Party to the 2008 South Carolina Republican Party Presidential Candidates Debate (in alphabetical order):

Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani - New York City

Former Governor Mike Huckabee - Arkansas

U.S. Senator John McCain - Arizona

U.S. Congressman Ron Paul - Texas

Former Governor Mitt Romney - Massachusetts

Former U.S. Senator Fred Thompson - Tennessee

Candidates who received invitations to participate in the debate have announced formal campaigns for president; filed the necessary paperwork with the Federal Election Commission and the South Carolina Republican Party to run for president; paid all candidate filing fees associated with their candidacy; met all U. S. constitutional requirements; and garnered at least 5% of the national electorate as determined by an average of the most recent national telephone polls of registered voters conducted by non-partisan public opinion polling organizations leading up to the registration deadline as determined by the South Carolina Republican Party and FOX News Channel; or, place in the top five in the New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary on January 8, 2008.

The 2008 South Republican Party Presidential Candidates Debate will be televised live by FOX News Channel at 9:00 PM from the Myrtle Beach Convention Center on Thursday, January 10, 2008. FOX News Channel Washington Managing Editor Brit Hume will moderate the debate while FOX News anchor Chris Wallace and White House Correspondent Wendell Goler will ask questions of the candidates.

FOX News Radio (FNR) will also provide listeners with live debate coverage beginning at 9 PM/ET. FNR’s Mike Majchrowitz will anchor the debate live from inside the hall. Following the debate, Majchrowitz and FNR Political Analyst and Washington Post columnist Jeff Birnbaum will provide post-debate analysis. They will be joined by FOX News Radio Correspondent Todd Starnes and several special guests live from “Spin Alley”.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2008election; duncanhunter; election2008; fredthompson; gopdebates; hunter; sc2008; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-298 next last
To: jwparkerjr

I don’t know what it is like in SC, but some states have dozens on the ballot...all sorts of wackos, who collectively might get 100 votes.

Every additional person limits the time of serious candidates. The standards here were not outrageous.


61 posted on 01/09/2008 12:27:57 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Without limited government, there is no religious freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I agree. And I note that you didn’t use the sarcasm tag, which was unnecessary.

B4DH.


62 posted on 01/09/2008 12:28:01 PM PST by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter won't "let some arrogant corporate media executive decide whether this campaign's over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

“I used to really like them, but lately I’ve found them to be only slightly better than the rest of pack.”

Reminds me of a certain political party.


63 posted on 01/09/2008 12:29:21 PM PST by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

“I used to really like them, but lately I’ve found them to be only slightly better than the rest of pack.”

Reminds me of a certain political party.


64 posted on 01/09/2008 12:29:21 PM PST by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bert
He is being looked at in CA for governor. That is a ways off yet. This election hasn’t even happened yet. And Hunter has my vote even if I have to write him in.
65 posted on 01/09/2008 12:29:31 PM PST by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

The man who has people believing he was the genius, not Gen. Petreaus, behind the surge. If that wasn’t bad enough, he is now using this disinformation to further fool people into believing that since he’s so obviously this great military strategist, that once President he would get OBL. In his own words “I will get OBL”. What a joke he is except that it isn’t funny.

I cannot stand to watch the debates anymore because I cannot stand to watch that big grin he gets on his face whenever he knows someone just called him out. It’s so obvious that he’s thinking .....yea, I know I’m an untrustworthy, charlatan sell-out, and lots of people know I am, but just look how many people I have fooled and isn’t it funny.


66 posted on 01/09/2008 12:29:46 PM PST by LaurenD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Fox strikes again."


Actually, I think that they learned their lesson this time. At least there were some objective criteria as to who participates. That was not so in New Hampshire debate.
67 posted on 01/09/2008 12:30:05 PM PST by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Yes, but how many of those people are the Ranking Republican on the Armed Services Committee and a candidate with delgates already committed to him?


68 posted on 01/09/2008 12:30:42 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: pissant

A couple of points of information:

To appear on the South Carolina primary ballot, a payment of $35,000, more than all the ballot access fees of all the other states combined, was required to be made to the state GOP.

A) Duncan Hunter made that payment.

B) Alan Keyes, because his campaign has from the beginning been a grassroots one, and not a money-driven one, did not pay what amounts to a huge poll tax.

Two separate issues, but things that all conservatives should know concerning what is happening to their electoral process.


69 posted on 01/09/2008 12:30:45 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Cut the heart out of the GOP platform, and the party will be nothing but "a Weekend at Bernie's...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Up to this point I’ve paid extra monthly to upgrade my satellite channels just so we could watch Fox News and escape some of the liberal media bias. Now, I’m seriously considering dropping to a more basic package that excludes Fox. Why should I continue to support them when they are getting as brazen as the others in their bias. Fox News can bite me, the SOB’s.


70 posted on 01/09/2008 12:31:43 PM PST by OB1kNOb (Support Duncan Hunter for the 2008 GOP presidential nominee. He is THE true conservative candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loboinok
Post the rest of the paragraph:

and garnered at least 5% of the national electorate as determined by an average of the most recent national telephone polls of registered voters conducted by non-partisan public opinion polling organizations leading up to the registration deadline as determined by the South Carolina Republican Party and FOX News Channel,; or, place in the top five in the New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary on January 8, 2008.

OUTRAGE doesn't begin to define the emotion.

71 posted on 01/09/2008 12:32:35 PM PST by Little_GTO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bert

None are qualified except Sinators and Goobernors? Even when the candidates who were in senate, such as Nachos McCain (and his good buddy “Aspirations of Citizenship for illegals” FRed Thompson) or a governor like FLIP Romney (and Nanny Huckleberry) have already proven that they cannot be trusted with presidency)?

Well, better scratch Rooty and rest of the field and leave it up to the RINOs to appoint whomever Ratsmussen and Zogby tell them to, but only if the choices are between FLIP Romney, Huckster, FRed & McLoon. GET REEEEL!


72 posted on 01/09/2008 12:33:19 PM PST by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pissant

We’re damn lucky they’re letting Fred on.


73 posted on 01/09/2008 12:33:57 PM PST by RockinRight (Huck(abee, not the Freeper Huck) Sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

“Anyone who has qualified to be on the ballot should be included in the debate. Period.”

So the New Hampshire debate should have included:
HUGH CORT
JOHN COX
H. NEAL FENDIG, JR.
DANIEL GILBERT
RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI
ALBERT HOWARD
“MIKE” HUCKABEE
DUNCAN HUNTER
ALAN KEYES
MARK KLEIN
STEPHEN W. MARCHUK
JOHN McCAIN
JAMES CREIGHTON MITCHELL,
CORNELIUS EDWARD O’CONNOR
MITT ROMNEY
JACK SHEPARD
THOMAS G. TANCREDO
FRED THOMPSON
“RON” PAUL
VERMIN SUPREME
“VERN” WUENSCHE


74 posted on 01/09/2008 12:34:04 PM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

qualified is not the issue. Electability is the issue.


75 posted on 01/09/2008 12:34:33 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

To some, what I’m going to post below may seem overly dramatic, but in my opinion is apt. I’m rather tired of my fellow conservatives who, even though they do not support my chosen candidate, as is their right, continue to ignore the abysmal treatment accorded him by the powers-that-be in this election.

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.

Pastor Martin Niemöller


76 posted on 01/09/2008 12:36:14 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Cut the heart out of the GOP platform, and the party will be nothing but "a Weekend at Bernie's...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bert

Yes. Electability. Nobody but the globalists.


77 posted on 01/09/2008 12:37:10 PM PST by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: bert
Electability is the issue.

"Electability" is a subjective term, as well as being a self-fulfilling one, when those deemed "unelectable" by the powers-that-be are excluded from the public debate.

78 posted on 01/09/2008 12:37:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Cut the heart out of the GOP platform, and the party will be nothing but "a Weekend at Bernie's...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

I am from NH, and I say why not?


79 posted on 01/09/2008 12:38:12 PM PST by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

They came for the conservatives. I said nothing because I was not a conservative.

They’ll come for Fox & the rest of them soon enough.

I hope they enjoy their dhimmitude.


80 posted on 01/09/2008 12:39:07 PM PST by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson