Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foxy Katon Kicks Duncan Hunter Out of Debate
Kaolin Kronicle ^ | 1-9-08

Posted on 01/10/2008 12:48:56 PM PST by thelastinkling

Fox News (in collusion with the SC GOP) has removed Congressman Duncan Hunter from the GOP debate lineup in Myrtle Beach on Thursday night. Just like Fox did in New Hampshire, they are banning Republican candidates who are on the ballot in South Carolina from the debate. It appears that Fox News has decided that they, not the voters, will choose the Republican nominee.

(Excerpt) Read more at dhgrassrevolt.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: duncanhunter; foxnews; gopdebates; mittromney; sc2008; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2008 12:48:58 PM PST by thelastinkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling

You are a day late on this...


2 posted on 01/10/2008 12:51:06 PM PST by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling

America has a new alphabet network, F-O-X.

When will America wake up and stop following these networks and their cherry picked candidates?


3 posted on 01/10/2008 12:51:23 PM PST by DakotaRed (Support Duncan Hunter, Not who the media says is best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling

I’m so riled up about all this. I want to hear more from several candidates and I don’t need other people to decide that for me. I’m pulling my hair out!


4 posted on 01/10/2008 12:51:37 PM PST by BlueHorseShoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed
America has a new alphabet network, F-O-X.

Exactly.

I've had it with them. I don't watch them anymore.

5 posted on 01/10/2008 12:52:49 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling

The debate should be determined by the ballot.

Ballot access is expensive and damned difficult to achieve.


6 posted on 01/10/2008 12:52:58 PM PST by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling
RINO Romney and Biased FOX Newscaught with a pre-fixed Luntz focus group
Biased FOX News receiver of Romney fund$$$$ declares Romney "an enormously attractive guy"
and routinely removes his rivals from debates.


7 posted on 01/10/2008 12:55:01 PM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling

Is the debate going to be televised nationally?


8 posted on 01/10/2008 12:55:29 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling
Fox News Is Skewing Early GOP Primaries

As you know, Duncan Hunter was excluded from the debates in Hew Hampshire and now in South Carolina.  Duncan Hunter is a viable and active candidate in good standing.  He had to pay $25,000 to get his name on the primary ballot in South Carolina!  He has a network of volunteers that has worked very hard, but all are barred by the SC GOP from attending the debate.  Worse, he is being excluded based upon one criterion imposed by Fox News:  he has not garnered 5% of the national electorate as determined by recent polling

 

So where is Fox News getting their poll data from?  If you go to their website, Duncan Hunter is not even listed as a candidate.  Furthermore, Fox News is drawing their consolidated poll data from Real Clear Politics, an online clearinghouse for dozens of polls.  According to Real Clear Politics, he doesn’t exist.  He is nowhere in their polling data – they are not even tracking him!

 

Therefore, Fox News is using incomplete poll data (and thereby skewed data) to exclude a candidate from the debates.  Information is knowingly being withheld from voters in these early states, and their access to a Presidential candidate is barred.  This, in turn, is affecting results in later states as candidates are prematurely dropped from consideration – BY THE MEDIA.  Not only is that unethical, it is manipulative, and it is blatantly contrary to the American electoral process.  There is no one holding the SC GOP or Fox News accountable. 

 

It is far too early to exclude candidates from the process - that is not fair to the voters.  Fox News is manipulating voter access and unfortunately, the South Carolina GOP is allowing it.  It is shameful and entirely anti-American.

 

 

Heidi Thiess
Texas Grassroots Coordinator


9 posted on 01/10/2008 12:56:13 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne; airborne; Antoninus; GulfBreeze; processing please hold; RasterMaster; ...

bump


10 posted on 01/10/2008 12:57:14 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Foxy Katon? One of the Fox babes did this?


11 posted on 01/10/2008 12:59:24 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling

I’m beginning to think that the lefties that call it ‘FAUX NEWS’ aren’t that far off.

It is precisely because all these news networks doing stuff like this, that few people know ho Duncan Hunter is and what he stands for.

I always knew that the media wanted to chose our leaders for us, but I had hopes that FOX would remain ‘Fair and Balanced”

Alas, now that the lefty Murdoch son is in charge, FOX is going to suck just as badly as all the rest of the networks.


12 posted on 01/10/2008 12:59:29 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thelastinkling

The media enjoys the vetting process they use to screen our candidates..

THEY pick the candidates from both sides and consequently, we get the most liberal of both sides.

The fix is in people. This is why I’ll vote third party most likely. See tagline and Flame away.


13 posted on 01/10/2008 1:00:23 PM PST by subterfuge (1st choice: Hunter------2nd choice: Thompson-----3rd choice: there is no 3rd choice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I’ve noticed that no one seems to be asking Luntz any questions about his “unbiased” focus groups.


14 posted on 01/10/2008 1:00:54 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

WOW, Thanks. Thats very significant


15 posted on 01/10/2008 1:01:08 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All; thelastinkling

“It appears that Fox News has decided that they, not the voters, will choose the Republican nominee.”

We need to start right now, and tell the GOP in the next primary states to INCLUDE Duncan Hunter, one of our heros who fought for our free speech.


16 posted on 01/10/2008 1:03:25 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I don’t watch fox. I don’t know what ‘babe’, or what you consider a babe, did the kicking ;)


17 posted on 01/10/2008 1:05:04 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

At least Alan Colmes is reading Sean Hannities email so he could at least ask about these bogus serial undecided candidates. Of course, the answer by Luntz was evidence that he was completely unaware that he was being duped by Romney plants.

(not that I think Romney had anything to do with it, but when some jacka$$ decided to rig ‘public opinion’ it is still a political crime and needs to be called out.)


18 posted on 01/10/2008 1:05:47 PM PST by bpjam (Harry Reid doesn't even have 32% of my approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
The media enjoys the vetting process they use to screen our candidates..

MSM tried shoving Rudi down our throats back when this pathetic "process" got started.

That didn't work, so now they're trying to see if McRomnabee will fit.

I'm a bit surprised they didn't find a way to exclude Thompson.

19 posted on 01/10/2008 1:06:31 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Laurie Dhue comes to mind...


20 posted on 01/10/2008 1:07:01 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson