Posted on 01/17/2008 5:16:01 AM PST by fweingart
Had Thomas Edison employed the same business strategy as his 21st-Century heirs at General Electric, he would have lobbied Congress to outlaw the candle in 1879 when he perfected and patented the light bulb.
He surely could have masked his self-interested lobbying in some public interest claim, such as fire prevention or the need for wax conservation. Today, the mask is environmentalism.
Earlier this month, Thomas Edison’s GE, together with Sylvania and Philips won a legislative victory when Congress passed an energy bill that would outlaw sale of the standard light bulb by 2012.
Sylvania is the leading light bulb maker worldwide, and GE is tops in America. These two companies, together with Dutch-based Royal Phillips Electronics, concede they basically wrote the new light bulb law. It goes without saying that they stand to profit from it — at consumer expense.
As reported previously in this column, the energy bill was loaded up with all sorts of favors for energy companies, manufacturers and other corporate bigwigs. The light bulb law follows the same pattern: A regulation touted as an environmental boon that will have dubious benefits to the planet, real costs to consumers and guaranteed profits for a handful of well-connected corporations.
The provision would make it illegal for American retailers in most cases to sell light bulbs that do not meet certain standards of efficiency — that is, a bulb in 2012 as bright as today’s 60 watt incandescent must get by with 42 watts of electricity.
Today, the clear successor to Thomas Edison’s incandescent bulb is the compact fluorescent light bulb (CFL). CFLs are more expensive, but they last longer and use less electricity. They have real downsides, however.
First, the light is not as attractive to many consumers — a problem with which the industry has struggled for years. Second, they take a little time after you flip the switch to reach full brightness.
Third, most CFLs can’t be used with dimmer switches or three-way fixtures. Fourth, the bulbs contain mercury, creating a potential health hazard in case of breakage and an environmental hazard for disposal.
This is where Philips Electronics enters the picture. Earlier this year, the company released its Halogena — an incandescent bulb (thus giving off more pleasing light and not having mercury) that meets the efficiency standards (by transforming some of the bulb’s heat into light using technology the firm calls “EcoBoost”).
These EcoBoosting Halogena bulbs are expensive (about $4.50 a pop compared to today’s incandescents, which can run as cheap as 31 cents each), but currently they’re the only incandescent bulb that meets Congress’ standards. If Philips didn’t readily concede they wrote the law, you could guess as much.
GE is only a couple of steps behind, announcing earlier this year that in 2010 it will release an incandescent bulb that’s even more efficient than Philips’ Halogena. On Dec. 18, the day the bill cleared its biggest hurdle and passed the Senate, GE’s stock jumped 8.8 percent, and Philips jumped 2.1 percent.
These companies will get rich thanks to energy bill, but it’s not clear the public or the environment will share the windfall GE and Philips will experience. GE makes its CFLs and other fancy light bulbs in China, while it makes its incandescents in the United States.
The light bulb law will ship more American jobs offshore, shift manufacturing to China’s dirtier and less efficient factories, and increase shipping distances. Add in the mercury, and it’s not clear how good this law is for the environment. Its clearest benefit is to the companies who lobbied for it.
Democrats came to Washington promising to end the influence of big business lobbyists. The energy bill — with its gifts to aluminum giants such as Alcoa, ethanol moguls such as Goldman Sachs and Archer Daniels Midland, and now GE, Sylvania and Phillips — shows that the doors of power are as wide open to corporate lobbyists as they have ever been, as long as the lobbyists are dressed in green.
“I just hope they keep being expensive up-front. When the wave hits, maybe people will be angry. Naaah.”
Prices on CFs have been dropping. But mandate their use and watch them skyrocket.
Almost as bad as Al Gore’s gallon & 1/2 comodes. Whatta rip.
I can see getting used to it.
But it’s kind of sad the “quality” has gone DOWN. I guess my son will be used to these things, and he’ll be shocked when I tell him mommy and daddy grew up where bulbs came on instantly!
Just like he might be shocked that I didn’t have to wear all that medieval armor to go bike-riding for hundreds of miles all over our town. And never was stuck in a seatbelt, either. Even got to ride in back of pick-up trucks and stand in our car with my body half out the moonroof!
Yes, but then, they may cheapen enough by then that it won’t matter much.
Oh, the 1.6 LITER?
Damn “crap”.
You’re right...but then LED’s may come to mass market by then.
“Just like he might be shocked that I didn’t have to wear all that medieval armor to go bike-riding for hundreds of miles all over our town. And never was stuck in a seatbelt, either. Even got to ride in back of pick-up trucks and stand in our car with my body half out the moonroof!”
I call it the “Bubble Wrapping” of society.
Thanks.
Before I flush it the first time I think I can see his face.
If he's not in the toilet he's espousing phony science about global warming, regardless of the fact that temperatures have remained the same for the past seven years.
I still have the book after passing it around to countless others to read.
Not only do we have a Parliament of Whores, but we have a government comprised of leftist pansies who need to go stand in a line to get a job.
I gave that book to my daughter when she was 17. Within a year she read every one of his books she could find.
>>The provision would make it illegal for American retailers in most cases to sell light bulbs that do not meet certain standards of efficiency — that is, a bulb in 2012 as bright as today’s 60 watt incandescent must get by with 42 watts of electricity.<<
There will probably also be higher efficiency incandescent bulbs. Current bulbs waste 97% of the energy. If they can get that down to only wasting 95% incandescents can qualify.
There will also be LED lights
I've been trying to be discreet by just buying a couple of 4-packs everywhere I go.
Fourth downside: they have to warm up before they deliver anything more than a dim glow (e.g., outside in the winter).
If Republicans had any brains at all, they would bludgeon their opponents with such examples of Big Brother, anti-freedom legislation. (But I would bet against that.)
(Rats! I'm not the only one who's thought of that,eh?)
You;re not “AFreeBird” as long as some idjut in Washington believes that they have to tell you what light bulbs you can use.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.