I want Clinton to win the primary. Here is why:
1. Americans are weary of an oligarchy
2. She has a very liberal voting record
3. She is very polarizing
4. She is a biatch
I’m starting to agree with you. Hillary will be the easiest to beat in the general elections.
Ditto.
1. Americans are weary of an oligarchy
2. She has a very liberal voting record
3. She is very polarizing
4. She is a biatch
Throughout history and throughout the Bible, those who by their words and deeds have destined themselves for 'disaster' are first raised to some sort pinnacle of success and wealth, so that their imminent plunge will be noticeable to many and perhaps, serve as a lesson.
Newton's third law:
"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" has not suddenly become inactive....it just has a time element and in the case of the Clintons, it is catching up. They can delay it, but never stop it....and it continues to build like water behind a dam.
I think she’d be the most difficult to defeat. She’s got an experience political machine behind her and Americans have pathetically short memories. All she’ll have to do is go on Oprah a few times and cry and she’ll have all of those weak women who swear they’ll never vote for her eating out of her hand. Throw in a few late night tv appearences where she shows her “humor” and the MSM lackeys that’ll shill for her and it’s over.
Not me. Clintons cheat.
We want Obama to take the hit, but survive to win over her.
That’s safest for us.
I go back and forth on this but I am currently of the same opinion as you: the Beast will be easier to beat than the BoyMullah.
LOL!
so you think a pubie could beat her?
I don’t know. She ought to be beat anywhere in the United States. But Shes winning.... I Don’t like it
Rove, knows it, you know it and I know it.
1, 3 and 4 are true.
2 isnt.
That’s a problem that I hope has been trouble-shooted at the RNC since Clinton took office. I worry it hasnt, too much instability at the top.
The sole and only point of her entire Senate career has been to set her up for this. Every vote has been strategic, to set her up for this. Clinton politics = Machine politics.
Look at her commitee work. War. Money. That’s it. That’s her record. That’s terrorism and the economy, everything else is whatever pushes Clinton over 51 %, Bush style.
We need to get rid of #1 or we’ll keep getting nominally elected winners who are permanently logjammed by nominally defeated losers because machine politics on both sides always just tries to win. 51 % does it, but it just drags election season on 24/7.
We cant even go back to liking each other for a few years after a big election anymore. Fighting elections just to win 51 % means you have to slice and dice the population by demographics, and that’s identity politics in a country as big as the US. Both sides do it, though. We’re still months away from an election and look how much people are even fightin here. And we all share the same creed!
I dont think Clinton’s evil, but I do think machine politics could use a break.