Posted on 01/31/2008 10:37:41 AM PST by Delacon
Sorry, it’s too late and in all honesty, there is no way Romney could win. He appeals to no constituencies besides conservatives and upper income white males. I’m not excited about McCain either, but it’s time to get aboard and hope that he picks a conservative VP we can all get excited about.
Good tagline! ;-)
Good tagline! ;-)
Very well put.
In that case, Obama or Hillary already won.
We Conservatives must always try to please our critics, and John McCain is that man
What's all the fuss just because McCain "rarely" works with our critics. I mean, are we not a little selfish to demand things be done right and invoke leadership and principle, right from wrong when exercising legislative power.
Let's not ignore, but celebrate those wonderful compromises that McCain "rarely" executed.
McCain/Feingold
McCain/Kennedy
Opposition to tax cuts
Giving Constitutional rights to terror detainees
Opposing interrogation techniques of terror detainees
Leading "Gang of 7" morons on caving into democRAT judicial demands
Accepts extremist environmental positions
constantly burns bridges with Conservatives, builds bridges with democRATS
...etc
“Sent my few dollars to Mitt this morning.”
So did I.
Mitt Romney is a great man and will be a great leader. I met him and Ann yesterday and they are so real and decent.
Thank you, Mark Levin.
True. It took having a Carter to get us a Reagan.
On the down side, some things can never be put back together again. We may have reached that stage.
Well, why don’t you go through Mark’s argument, and do a point-by-point rebuttal showing how Romney is as bad as McCain? That’s the purpose of responding to an article after all, to debate the merits of the argument put forth.
Carter did do a hell of a lot of damage too. Southeast Asia and the Middle East are all screwed up because of him to this day.
Did he say anything you disagree with in his littany against McCain? Or do you argue that those items are not disqualifying?
If not, is there anything in Romney’s platform or his stump speeches or what he says in the debates or on the campaign trail that you find disqualifying for a conservative?
If not, are you going to vote in a way that will choose as our nominee the man with the flaws Mark points out, rather than the man who is running on a solid conservative platform?
Is fear that a candidate might be lying mean more to you than the actual spoken words of a candidate that is in opposition to conservative values?
So anotherwords, we vote for a guy that will implement 50 to 75% of Hillary’s goals.
Look, at best Romney will hold the line on current illegal alien policy. Still more millions will pour across our borders and the next democrat will legalize them anyway.
Do you really think Romney will do anything more than cosmetic with regard to illegal immigration?
I don’t. He’s a business man. What has been the policy of big business with regard to illegal immigration?
Thoughts?
Refute his points, don’t simply assert that you can.
It appears that on Tuesday the great state of Montana will proudly commit its delegates for the next President of the United States, Mitt Romney!
Myth is as much Conservative as I am tall, dark, and handsome. :)
His past statements and positions line up and match exactly with his actions as Governor. Yet, people still want to believe, and make him out to be a Conservative.
It’s just more Mitt-ology from Myth Romney and Co.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.