Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Moves To Seize Control Of All U.S. Waters
Land Rights Network ^

Posted on 02/07/2008 5:53:12 PM PST by Bruce 22-250

Issue: Having been slapped down by the U. S. Supreme Court’s recent decision that the words “navigable waters” in the Clean Water Act limited federal agencies to regulation of navigable waters only. Democrats and liberal Republicans in Congress are striking back.

They are attempting to pass the Clean Water Restoration Act of 2007 (HR2421 and S1870) that would amend the 1972 Clean Water Act and replace the words “navigable waters” with “waters of the United States.” Further, it defines "waters of the United States" with such breathtaking scope that federal agencies would be required to regulate use of every square inch of the U.S., both public and private.

(Excerpt) Read more at landrights.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; landrights; liberalfascism; nazis; powergrab; propertyrights; scotus; water; waterrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Bruce 22-250

I don’t doubt that at all. I haven’t trusted EnviroWackos or Government for years. ;)


41 posted on 02/08/2008 5:23:57 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
If you ask Jerry Brown, his office will tell you that all streams are now considered navigable unless the state or the court rules otherwise. This is a huge taking of private property done in the wink of an eye and I bet you weren’t even aware of it.

IIRC, the definition of "navigable" has already been adjudicated as anything over 12 DWT.

42 posted on 02/08/2008 5:53:03 PM PST by Carry_Okie (We have people in power who love evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Your talking under Federal law 12 DWT. The Link Marsh2 had was about how CA law. I;m no lawyer nor did I sleep in Holiday Express last night. :-)

If this new Clean Water act become law we are in serious trouble.


43 posted on 02/08/2008 6:02:31 PM PST by Bruce 22-250 (Vote stop the WITCH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Love your tag line. :-) Does your Dad post or just read?


44 posted on 02/08/2008 6:04:02 PM PST by Bruce 22-250 (Vote stop the WITCH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Wuz it frozen or thawed the day that they were there?


45 posted on 02/08/2008 6:33:30 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bruce 22-250

My “real” Dad just reads once in a while if I ping him to something. Grace’s Dad (who I was pinging) and I were debating the damage EnviroWacko groups do to our freedoms on another thread, so I thought this would be of interest him. ;)


46 posted on 02/09/2008 6:29:08 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

It was during the brief summer and they had pictures of riverbank erosion. This is a serious problem for those who have built a subdivision on a gravel bar. You too can live on a gravel bar.


47 posted on 02/09/2008 10:10:48 AM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Here in central California, we have new subdivisions being built at 9 feet above sea level, 55 miles from the ocean, in the San Joaquin delta, ‘protected’ by peat soil berms.
(it’s OK you know, since we have a flood insurance program)


48 posted on 02/09/2008 10:23:10 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: george76; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
They are attempting to pass the Clean Water Restoration Act of 2007 (HR2421 and S1870) that would amend the 1972 Clean Water Act and replace the words "navigable waters" with "waters of the United States." Further, it defines "waters of the United States" with such breathtaking scope that federal agencies would be required to regulate use of every square inch of the U.S., both public and private.
Now, see, I'm against that.

Thanks george76.
49 posted on 02/09/2008 11:25:52 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson