Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives in Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island & Vermont should vote for Hillary Clinton today
vanity | March 4, 2008 | the eagle has landed

Posted on 03/04/2008 5:57:53 AM PST by TheEaglehasLanded

I think Rush is right on this one, the Democrats and media chose our candidate for us so we ended up with McCain. Now we have a chance to have influence on theirs.

If Clinton loses all 4 primaries Conservatives would be ha. I like Obama more but that is because he is a likeable person but he seems to have radical friends with the Weather Underground Bill Ayers, Pastor "Farrakhan is great" Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, MOVE ON, etc.

If Hillary wins the delegate count by a slight margin today her superdelegates stay with her and Pennsylvania which is a month away will be the next big battle.

If Obama wins big today it's over!! Easy decision today. VOTE FOR HILLARY


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio; US: Rhode Island; US: Texas; US: Vermont; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: clinton; conservatives; democrat; oh2008; primary; tx2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: deuteronlmy232
Rush is absolutely right as usual. Hillary has the highest negatives of any candidate and is more beatable in the general.

Obama has low negatives and McCain and the GOP will not go after him. We have to keep Hillary in so she can bloody him up and make him more vulnerable if he does become the nominee.

Voting for Hillary in the primary is actually a way to advance the conservative agenda.

61 posted on 03/04/2008 6:34:47 AM PST by Maneesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

I absolutely agree with your assessment which I have been telling my husband all along. Good for you. I don’t know where Rush is coming from but I am convinced that Hillary should be defeated NOW because later she will not be.


62 posted on 03/04/2008 6:35:21 AM PST by farahdiba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

I absolutely agree with your assessment which I have been telling my husband all along. Good for you. I don’t know where Rush is coming from but I am convinced that Hillary should be defeated NOW because later she will not be.


63 posted on 03/04/2008 6:37:00 AM PST by farahdiba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Hillary will get socialized medicine and the rest of her socialist agenda enacted. Anyone who wants the Clintons back into the WH is a glutton for punishment. They will be ready to destroy this country and redeem Bill’s legacy from Day One. Obama would be far better than the Clintons, just because it will take him a year just to find the bathrooms in the WH.


64 posted on 03/04/2008 6:37:29 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Voting for Hillary is a bad idea from every angle. Worst case it enables her to win outright. Next worst case it gives her enough “chips” to secure the VP slot on a Democrat “dream team”.

It is difficult to believe that conservatives do not appreciate and accept the unexpected good fortune to have the Clinton machine derailed by forces within their own party. Unlike the upstart Obama, the Clinton machine has had sixteen years to extend its roots through all levels and branches of government (federal, state, local, executive, legislative, judicial). A major thrust their agenda is vengence and payback directed at their opponents. It is a hostile entity. Cutting the head off now will effectively defund and disempower the whole rotten enterprise.


65 posted on 03/04/2008 6:37:30 AM PST by info_scout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Obama is ready to capitulate to our enemies and alienate our friends. He also came up with a hideous “World Poverty Act.”
Gimme the Klintoons any day. Criminals are better than Commies any day.


66 posted on 03/04/2008 6:40:23 AM PST by Little Ray (Drink the KoolAid: McCain for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

The strategy may or may not work. Imagine voting for Hillary today to have her win the nomination, and then win the election. As the G-man says, “Oh, ye suckers!”


67 posted on 03/04/2008 6:40:52 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

Hold muh beer while ah go vote for Hillary.
Why? `Cause I want her to lose . . . duh.


68 posted on 03/04/2008 6:42:47 AM PST by tumblindice (I keep expecting to wake up, screaming....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
El Zibo wants Hillary Clinton to become President, make no doubt about it.

That is probably one of the most asinine statements I've read in quite a while.

To make it simple for those of you who don't understand strategy: If Obama knocks Hillary off today, he will have the next 8 months and hundreds of millions of dollars to unite the party and start attacking McCain full force. McCain doesn't even have a full campaign staff, and is out of money. He will be slaughtered.

Whereas, if Hillary wins today, neither of them can win the nomination before the convention. That means floor fights over delegates, back room deals, Hillary and Obama spending hundreds of millions attacking each other over the next 8 months (giving us more ammo against the ultimate nominee), and leaving a party that with at least 50% of their base pissed off at their own nominee, and less than 3 months to put together a general election campaign.

69 posted on 03/04/2008 6:52:20 AM PST by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Obama is ready to capitulate to our enemies and alienate our friends. Criminals are better than Commies any day.

You seem to forget the Clintons failure to take action after the first WTC bombing, the Riyad bombing, the bombing of our embassies in East Africa, the Khobar Tower bombings, the USS Cole, the pardoning of the Puerto Rican terrorists, the Marc Rich pardon, giving US missile and satellite technology to the Chinese, the stealing of atomic secrets from Los Alamos, etc. I could go on and on.

Forget about the World Poverty Act that will never pass Congress and remember the Clintons' collusion with the Chinese communists, including taking their money for his campaign, and failure to take action against the jihadists. You have a selective memory.

70 posted on 03/04/2008 6:52:43 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

LOL. We have a deeply flawed candidate who will get trounced by either Obama or Hillary. The question is which of the two we want in the WH. I will take Obama over the Clintons any day. If we have a chance to take Hillary out now, it should be done.


71 posted on 03/04/2008 6:55:23 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

Finally someone that gets it.

If Obama wins today, the Dems will coalesce around him and destroy McCain who has already stated that he will not fight back.

We have a woefully inept candidate in McCain who is out of money and unlikely to get more since no one I know is passionate about him.

The “vote for Hillary” strategery is the best way for McCain to win. This is war folks and Rush has suggested a brilliant and viable strategery.


72 posted on 03/04/2008 6:56:49 AM PST by Maneesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Actually Obama is more dangerous because he is a Marxist that is dangerously naieve on foreign policy. Hillary would be far better than him on foreign policy and a war situation which is a dubious distinction but there nonetheless.
73 posted on 03/04/2008 6:59:52 AM PST by Maneesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
Spare the strategy crap. If Hillary Clinton survives she is going to be the democrat nominee without a fight at the convention and she is going to have Obama as her Vice President. She only needs to win Ohio in November and then she is going to be President.
74 posted on 03/04/2008 7:01:52 AM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
This Texas conservative will be voting in the GOP primary because we have important down-ballot primary races.

This is not a presidential-race only primary.

75 posted on 03/04/2008 7:02:16 AM PST by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

As far as I can tell, here in Ohio one must switch party affiliation to do so - no open voting. Maybe I’m wrong.


76 posted on 03/04/2008 7:02:24 AM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IndyTiger
If Hillary Clinton wins big in Ohio and Texas she is going to be the nominee at the convention without a fight, she is going to put Obama as her Vice President and she is going to become President. Please do not vote for Hillary Clinton.
77 posted on 03/04/2008 7:04:00 AM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: deuteronlmy232

You are correct, IF you originally supported Huck. I originally supported FDT and he is on the ballot here in Texas.


78 posted on 03/04/2008 7:04:11 AM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot
The strategy may or may not work. Imagine voting for Hillary today to have her win the nomination, and then win the election. As the G-man says, “Oh, ye suckers!”

For Hillary it is first and foremost about the power--seizing it, wielding it, and holding it. That is her agenda, and once entrenched will be very difficult to reverse. She is a far more dangerous adversary. Just listen to her rhetoric. She bills herself as "a fighter". It is about smashing down her opposition. A Clinton administration will hit the ground running to silence and destroy the opposition (convservatives) by every means available. It is absolutely nuts to help her do it.
79 posted on 03/04/2008 7:05:22 AM PST by info_scout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Maneesh
Actually Obama is more dangerous because he is a Marxist that is dangerously naieve on foreign policy. Hillary would be far better than him on foreign policy and a war situation which is a dubious distinction but there nonetheless.

Hillary is the real Marxist. And if you think the Clintons' foreign policy is so superior, then you have ignored the Clintons' eight year record in the WH. They ignored bin Laden despite the fact that he declared war on us in 1996 and attacked us repeatedly. The Clintons traitorous relationship with the Chinese communists continues. Remember Norman Hsu?

80 posted on 03/04/2008 7:08:29 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson