Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red6

Actually, revolvers are deceiving in that they are internally much more complicated (more moving parts) than a semiauto. Outwardly, they are indeed simpler to use. If you like them, than that is the weapon for you. I like them as well, especially in .357 although it is not my own first choice when I go shooting. I’ve recommended them many times to people who only want to own one handgun that is simple to operate.


105 posted on 03/23/2008 7:16:20 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Ask me again tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Kirkwood
Actually, revolvers are deceiving in that they are internally much more complicated (more moving parts) than a semiauto.

Maybe so, but it is no big deal to totally tear a revolver completely apart (including all internal parts) to clean it. I have done it many times with my black powder revolvers.

122 posted on 03/23/2008 7:23:32 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (If you don't want people to get your goat, don't tell them where it's tied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Kirkwood
I know what you’re saying (You’re counting number of parts); there is more than meets the eye to a revolver; but not every semi-auto is simple to completely break down, nor with few parts. Not every semi is like a SIG 2XX. Though the semi might even have fewer parts, it is mechanically a more complex design, doing more complex things.

In general a revolver is more tolerant may that be cheap or somehow defective ammunition, weather, etc. The revolver is as far as user break down is concerned, usually super easy, so is its cleaning. The extraction, self feeding, ammunition storage, and firing pin designs of many semi-autos are more prone to failure than the manufacturers lead one to believe with their perfect world accounts in some MTBF test. A defective magazine or a case with a damaged head might not feed or extract correctly, and with a revolver you would never even know there was something wrong with that round. We used older 38 revolvers in arctic infantry units all the way into the late 90s in Alaska such as 1-17 IN, 2-1 IN, and 501 IN when we still had an arctic mission. The Beretta already the mainstay in the US Army then, was not used by us because this weapon can fail in the arctic environment in which we operated.

As a civilian you are allowed to use ammunition not authorized in the military. You generally don't have to worry about bad guys wearing body armor either. A 38 is plenty, and it's what you load that makes the bigger difference vs. a much hotter round. Cheap ammo, low recoil, able to be small and compact, a 38 for self defense is just fine. -IMHO

179 posted on 03/23/2008 9:46:06 PM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson