Posted on 04/02/2008 3:39:20 PM PDT by neverdem
Which “fact” did I invent?
I would have to agree with you. Each one of these adults should be sued & fired.
Projection.
Why don’t you answer my questions? Shall I repeat them again?
The civil suit failed. You really should read the decision.
Finally, despite all of your illogical and empty bloviating, you have still to make a single apostrophied expletive deleted point.
We all want to know? Do you approve of the actions of these school officials? Why do you think it is ok to go searching the skivies of a teenage girl for an Advil? Is it ok to do this if she "volunteers?"
Public schools or full of adult child predators, both male and female.That's a statement, not a question. Or did you mean to append a question mark?
Ya can't leave out what isn't there.
"Public schools or full of adult child predators, both male and female. This is well documented daily and weekly in this country. You haven't' heard?"
The doctrine of "Loco Parentis"Britannica.com:
[teachers] [...]
The doctrine of in loco parentisWhen minor children are entrusted by parents to a school, the parents delegate to the school certain responsibilities for their children, and the school has certain liabilities. In effect, the school and the teachers take some of the responsibility and some of the authority of the parents. The exact extent and nature of this responsibility and power vary from one society to another and from one school system to another. This is spelled out to some extent in the law, but much of it is determined by local custom and practice.
There is, of course, a relation between the age of the child on the one hand and the teacher's responsibility and liability for it on the other. The young child must obey the teacher, and the teacher may use the methods expected and tolerated in the community to control the child's behaviour. Furthermore, the child's physical safety is entrusted to the school and to the teacher, who thus become legally liable for the child's safety, insofar as negligence can be proved against them.
Now we know your personal standard of "local custom and practice." Other than you only the late great pervert robertpaulsen considers the actions that took place in this school as examples of "methods expected and tolerated in the community to control the child's behaviour." You have the "facts" of an untried case on your side. The ones you pick and choose. What you don't have is any sense of decency or propriety that anyone else on this board agrees with. That is a fact. You are viewed here as a repugnant, immoral zealot for authoritarian control of the population. That is also a fact. You have your "facts" and we have ours. Good day to you, slug.
That was your question?
That's so sad.
You need to read it. The Civil suit did not fail. It was dismissed in summary dispostion, plaintiff appealed and that is the subject of the appeal. The COA 3 judge pannel upheld the dismissal. On application for leave to the COA en banc, leave was granted, oral arguments heard, and the full court can reverse. If they did not see grounds that might cause them to reverse they would have denied the en banc appeal.
A reversal by the COA en banc means that the case goes back to trial, i.e. the lawsuit will go ahead.
We already said all of that and you ignored it. Don't kick up more dust by distracting folks as to what is going on here. This lawsuit is very much alive, and some publicity, of the kind you are bringing, might cause some of the judges to concentrate on the seriousness of the issues before them.
“Public schools or full of adult child predators, both male and female. This is well documented daily and weekly in this country. You haven’t’ heard?”
Do ya see the question mark freddy?
I wonder if this was your child would you be so agreeable to have her clothes removed? You may want the school to have total control over children but clearly almost everyone disagrees with you. In fact only robertpaulsen sounds just like you. Are you related by chance?
Even suspended, you're afraid to ping him.
I find your fantasy about my children disturbing.
We are waiting for you to put your shriveled up excuse of a manhood on the table and tell us what YOU think. But you are too much of a snake in the grass to come out in the light of day.
Read the article again.
Apparently you have reading comprehension issues and it didn’t sink in the first time.
Yes. Why do you ask?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.