Replies

Latest liberal rant from wing nut columnist.

Sigh..Savage is correct, liberalism IS a mental disorder.

1 posted on 04/12/2008 6:48:24 PM PDT by garbageguy

"In a recent Pew research poll people stated they trusted Democrats more on Iraq than Republicans"

People this criminally stupid should not be permitted to vote because they lack the basic intellect to make an informed decision.

2 posted on 04/12/2008 6:54:45 PM PDT by infantrywhooah (Hold your nose and vote in November. Even McCain is better than the alternatives)

And look at what CBS (et al) chooses to cover. Go to their website and check the latest headline stories - you’ll see a definite pattern of bias. Here are two of the three features that 60 Minutes will have Sunday night (disgusting):

State Of Corruption
Corruption in Iraq is so entrenched that militia groups known to target U.S. troops control some of Iraq’s ministries and have used those government funds and resources to kill Americans. Steve Kroft reports. | Watch Video

El Sistema
Through a system of early training and local orchestras, Venezuela has not only provided an uplifting musical experience for its at-risk youth, but also developed an orchestra that is world famous. Bob Simon reports. | Watch Video

SO, with millions of viewers, they’re featuring stories about a) the corruption in the new Iraq govt. (i.e., our dismal failure to make any good progress), and b) the glories of Venezuela (i.e., Hugo Chavez is okay).

How do we stand a chance with so much MSM propaganda and the vast majority of people (voters) not knowing the difference???

5 posted on 04/12/2008 7:31:45 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)

There has never been an American war without opposition..

well.. DUH! .. It's kind of silly to fight yourself!

6 posted on 04/12/2008 7:43:57 PM PDT by Wil H

The ton of iron must be in Crawford’s head.

7 posted on 04/12/2008 7:47:17 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)

There has never been an American war without enemy opposition.

Fixed it.

8 posted on 04/12/2008 8:07:23 PM PDT by onedoug

The argument this fool makes is easy to deal with.

Look over the history of the past 200 years. Leaders of which political party held the Presidency when the foreign war in question started?

A President of which party had to clean up the mess to close out that war?

Yes, Iraq is an exception.

12 posted on 04/12/2008 9:04:26 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)

In a recent Pew research poll people stated they trusted Democrats more on Iraq than Republicans.

Yep, and that’s why McCain is going to win.

13 posted on 04/12/2008 9:11:58 PM PDT by garylmoore (Faith is the assurance of things unseen.)

They have been perceived as more attuned to protecting the nation from those who might threaten our nation.

He got three sentences out before the liberal robo-script started. No record but quick on the draw nonetheless.

14 posted on 04/12/2008 9:27:52 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Beijing 2008. Olympic Games for murdering regimes.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794