Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy launches U.S.S. Independence, first of new class of weapons-bristling speedster trimarans
DVICE (SciFi) ^ | May 2008

Posted on 05/07/2008 8:24:11 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot

We’ve been hearing rumblings about the U.S. Navy’s triple-hulled ships, but here’s one that was launched last month, the U.S.S Independence. Built by General Dynamics, it’s called a “littoral combat ship” (LCS), and the trimaran can move huge weapons around faster than any ship in the Navy. Ironic that with all that high tech built in, the ship reminds us of the Merrimac ironclad from Civil War days.

Littoral means close to shore, and that’s where these fleet-hulled babies will operate, tailor-made for launching helicopters and armored vehicles, sweeping mines and firing all manner of torpedoes, missiles and machine guns.

These ships were designed to be relatively inexpensive — this one’s a bargain at $208 million — and the navy plans to build 55 of them. This trimaran is the first of the new fire-breathing breed, ready to scoot out of dry dock at a rumored 60 knots. It's like a speedy and heavily-armed aircraft carrier for helicopters.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: littoral; navy; ships; trimarans; trimorans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: lajollasurfer
Even the Bridge is way cool.


21 posted on 05/07/2008 8:38:16 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

The shape of that thing looks a little bit stealthy.


22 posted on 05/07/2008 8:38:16 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

news article dated 6 weeks ago:

Navy’s $5.2 billion Littoral Combat Ship, which has had such extensive troubles that the service expects the cost of its first two ships to exceed their combined budget of $472 million by more than 100 percent.08:17, 1 April 2008


23 posted on 05/07/2008 8:39:12 PM PDT by lajollasurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lajollasurfer

“The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Class Squadron (CLASSRON) was formally established Feb. 15 in San Diego.

Vice Adm. Terrance Etnyre, Commander, Naval Surface Force, joined Capt. John Riley, the new CLASSRON commodore, to cut the ribbon at the new command’s headquarters.

While the first two ships of the LCS class are still under construction, the staff of the new CLASSRON will still be extremely busy with all of the challenges associated with developing new processes to support these 21st-century warships.

The first four ships in the class each have blue and gold crews that will consist of 40 personnel. The aviation detachment will be comprised of 20 personnel, and the mission modules that can be changed depending on the ship’s tasking will comprise of 15 personnel.”

http://www.c3f.navy.mil/newspage_LCS_CLASSRON_Established.htm


24 posted on 05/07/2008 8:41:32 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lajollasurfer

More crew info

http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=25034


25 posted on 05/07/2008 8:43:12 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

How about an aircraft carrier for $45million built within six months of an order:

http://www.alibaba.com/product-free/11226603/Mobile_Coastal_Defence_Systems.html


26 posted on 05/07/2008 8:43:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only Hillary or Obama can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Maybe they’d let us back on active duty for a cruise. I’ll lie about your age if you’ll lie about mine... ;-)


27 posted on 05/07/2008 8:43:50 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

The General Dynamics Littoral Combat Ship design is based on a proven Austal (Henderson, Australia) high-speed trimaran hull that is currently operating at sea.
http://www.austal.com/

General Dynamics Littoral Combat Team
http://www.gdlcs.com/


28 posted on 05/07/2008 8:46:57 PM PDT by endthematrix (Now that we use our corn for fuel, when do we eat coal for dinner?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

57 mm is only a six-pounder gun. There was a time when we built things with sixteen-inch guns, each capable of firing a 2700 pound projectile. When you have nine sixteen inch guns (or 12 guns, as planned for the Montana class), you don’t NEED a helicopter to demolish anything within 25 miles (more with rocket-assisted projectiles).


29 posted on 05/07/2008 8:49:07 PM PDT by Winged Hussar (http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Uh, what are we going to do with a fleet of coastal ships?

Is this for the Coast Guard, or to do drug interdiction in the Caribbean?

They aren't thinking of steaming a tri-hull over the ocean to say, the Red Sea, are they?
How will they transport this thing?
And what will support it?

30 posted on 05/07/2008 8:49:42 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator

yeah I agree. They should be able to put it in a fiberglass shell just to keep the water off it.


31 posted on 05/07/2008 8:49:45 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Effin A!

That is one mean ship.


32 posted on 05/07/2008 8:50:16 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Nice but
1) They seem to actually cost over 400 million.
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/02/defense_lcscosts_080205n/
2) No Verticle Launch system limits missile capabilities. is 16 block 41 VLS tubes too much to ask for?
33 posted on 05/07/2008 8:51:32 PM PDT by rmlew (Down with the ersatz immanentization of the eschaton known as Globalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Uh, what are we going to do with a fleet of coastal ships?

Stop the Chinese invasion of Taiwan?

34 posted on 05/07/2008 8:51:51 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are doom and gloomers, union members and liberals so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Far as I understand this is for special operations missions.
In other words this is the Seal team’s boat.
35 posted on 05/07/2008 8:52:56 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Crewing of a traditional type ship usually consists of in excess of 250 men, but an MCDS unit can operate on a ships crew of 10 / 15 men plus the necessary weapons technicians-thus creating a vast saving in manpower and running costs.
Aircraft / Helicopter Carrier

Technology is sweet.


36 posted on 05/07/2008 8:52:59 PM PDT by lajollasurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
I wonder how large the radar cross section is.
37 posted on 05/07/2008 8:53:02 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are doom and gloomers, union members and liberals so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Back in the late 60’s the U.S. Navy contacted NBC and Gene Roddenberry about the bridge design of the fictional Starship Enterprise. They were impressed with how orderly it was, and began a study about integrating the design in to navy ships.

I see they learned their lesson well. m:o)

38 posted on 05/07/2008 8:56:35 PM PDT by BigCinBigD (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

You know for just a few dollars more they could have put primer on the boat to keep the paint from peeling off.


39 posted on 05/07/2008 8:58:31 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Deal.


40 posted on 05/07/2008 8:59:32 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson