Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it Possible that California Could Go for McCain?
May 30, 2008 | no dems

Posted on 05/30/2008 7:15:09 AM PDT by no dems

Is it possible that California could go for a Republican for the first time since 1988? One of the cable news networks reported last night that McCain had come within a few percentage points of B. Hussein Obama in CA.

What could make this happen?

#1. The referendum on the ballot that would reverse the State Supreme Court Ruling on same-sex marriage. This will bring Conservatives out in droves. (Hopefully out of their hatred for McCain they won’t vote for B. Hussein Obama.)

#2. The craziness that keeps going on in B. Hussein's church. I've got to believe that the majority of Californians are not crazy enough to align their politicl ideology with those nuts; the latest being Fr. Pfleger. Like most other Americans, the majority of Californians have got to realize that B. Hussein is the product of 20 years of indoctrination by preachers who hate White people.

#3. The fact that many Californians who would vote Democratic believe that B. Hussein is a closet Muslim who would be sympathetic to Islamo-Fascists; his autobiography indicates as much.
SIDE BAR: If, God forbid, there is another Terrorist Attack on our soil before November 4, Cindy McCain can start measuring for drapes in the White House.

#4. The large Hispanic vote in CA. There is a wide gulf between the Mexicans and the Blacks in America. They just don’t like or trust each other. The only thing that might offset this would be if Bill Richardson is on the ticket in the VEEP spot. And...

#5. There's a lot of ticked-off, Hillary-supporting, women out there who, if they just stay home, along with many men who feel that Hillary has been dissed by the media and the Obama Campaign, can give McCain a 5% point gain.

Hey, it could happen!


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2008; california; hispanicvote; homosexualagenda; mccain; mccainsucks; noway; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: LiveFree99

True. Even with the known and proven illegal alien votes, he lost by only a few hundred votes.


41 posted on 05/30/2008 8:02:26 AM PDT by null and void (Capitalism=>Audi, BMW, Porsche, Volkswagon. |WALL| Communism=>Trabi. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: devere

It COULD be another Reagan/Mondale blow out. Maybe.


42 posted on 05/30/2008 8:06:46 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (Buy a Mac ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Even if McCain had a chance in CA which I don't believe he does, he will not have the $ to contest it. You're right about that. He'll be outspent everywhere to the point that many sheeple will only see his name when they get a ballot. I really don't think it would make any difference who the Democrats nominate, Obama, Hillary, or someone else, they are headed for a blowout.

McCain may turn NH red (while losing everything down ballot,) but I think there will be a number of former red states from the past 2 elections turning blue. I don't expect McCain to do anywhere near as well as Dole did.

43 posted on 05/30/2008 8:07:18 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: null and void
"Even with the known and proven illegal alien votes, he [Dornan] lost by only a few hundred votes."

Yes, but the Republicans wanted Dornan gone almost as bad as the Democrats did, so nobody cared how he was beaten, as long as he was. Had control of the House turned on his election, then the Republicans and Newt would have made certain only legal votes counted, but they had seats to spare back then and saw an opportunity to get rid of one of those conservative types who embarrass them.

44 posted on 05/30/2008 8:17:25 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: no dems
California? Its nearly as left-wing as Massachusetts. A rock-solid conservative has no hope of carrying the state in a good year. John McCain has none against Obama. That's the long and short of it. And if he's a realist, he will write it off.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

45 posted on 05/30/2008 9:01:12 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
Yeah. Vanities suck.

Vanities that are well-written and decently thought out are fine. This one falls into that category, in my opinion.

If you don't like it, don't post on it.
46 posted on 05/30/2008 9:06:01 AM PDT by Antoninus (John 6:54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: no dems; oldglory; MinuteGal; gonzo; mcmuffin; sheikdetailfeather; seekthetruth; SE Mom; ...

My take:

Because of Operation Chaos, McCainiac will win in a land-slide.

Our job #1 will be to convince as many people as possible that they must also vote for their local/state Republican candidate who is running for the House or Senate seat in November.

We must convince them that they will be making a major mistake if they vote for the “RAT candidate (even if he seems/is more conservative than the Republican candidate), for this reason: McCain will not be able to come through on all the promises they like that he has made to them if the ‘RATS have a large enough majority in Congress to block everything he wants to do. We must keep ‘RATS from having enough votes to overturn his vetos.

If we can increase our numbers in Congress on McCain’’s coat-tails, we (conservatives) will be in a much better position to exert our influence to stop him from advancing the parts of his agenda we hate.

I cannot overstate the importance of our “Job # 1”, enough, but we should hold back until we get closer to the election (when the polls show McCain’s big lead) before we go into full-court-press in implementing it.


47 posted on 05/30/2008 10:10:16 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Driving an Operation Chaos Hybrid that burns both gas AND rubber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

” I think it depends on how big a joke Obama turns out to be.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Obama is a very big joke indeed! He may actually be a bigger joke than both Clintons and AlGore rolled up together. I never expected to see anything remotely resembling this clown running as a serious candidate for president.


48 posted on 05/30/2008 10:23:53 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: penowa
Bingo.

The money quote?

...an opportunity to get rid of one of those conservative types who embarrass them.

49 posted on 05/30/2008 10:28:17 AM PDT by null and void (Capitalism=>Audi, BMW, Porsche, Volkswagon. |WALL| Communism=>Trabi. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: no dems

how can #2 & #3 both be true? if they’re upset about his church why would they think he’s a muslim? they contradict each other


50 posted on 05/30/2008 11:24:25 AM PDT by houston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

From today’s Sacramento Bee:

http://www.sacbee.com/walters/story/975972.html

Dan Walters: McCain sees California hopes dim

(snip)

Recent polls by the Public Policy Institute of California, the Los Angeles Times and, most recently, Field Research Corp. all have found McCain trailing either of the Democratic hopefuls substantially, thanks largely to the Democrats’ greater appeal to independent voters.

PPIC’s survey of likely voters revealed a 17-point lead for Obama over McCain, 54 percent to 37 percent, with Clinton’s margin a bit smaller. The Times poll’s lead for Obama over McCain was seven points, 47 percent to 40 percent, and for Clinton, three points, 43 percent to 40 percent. Field also found a 17-point lead for Obama, 52 percent to 35 percent, and the same lead for Clinton, 53 percent to 36 percent.

The remarkably similar results in the PPIC and Field polls, considered to be the most expansive of the three surveys, indicate that so far, McCain has been unable to make significant inroads into the all-important bloc of independent voters. His support in the mid-30 percent range is no higher than the Republican share of the electorate. Schwarzenegger’s effectiveness as a McCain campaigner is also problematic, since his popularity has been dropping sharply in recent months.


51 posted on 05/30/2008 11:31:52 AM PDT by calcowgirl (Schwarzenegger and McCain are trying to castrate the elephant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Not going to happen unless something drastic happens. Forget it.


52 posted on 05/30/2008 12:00:28 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Conservatives everywhere in California should go out of their way to make sure that a liberal like McCain is not elected to any public office. Liberals, whether a Republican like McCain or Democrats like Clinton and Obama are not good for this country.

Republicans, you have time to get rid of your angry, little presumptive nominee. For the good of our Republic, act while you still can.

53 posted on 05/30/2008 12:58:50 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Yes. Si.


54 posted on 05/30/2008 12:59:29 PM PDT by Cinnamon Girl (McCain calls it "radical islamic terrorism," the dems don't refer to it at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

And when we get rid of our angry, little presumptive nominee who do we have then? Who do you want us to vote for Obama or write in Clinton? God forbid; I hope you’re not suggesting someone “harm” John McCain. You sound very angry and bitter. I don’t care for McCain either but it’s time to act like reasonable adults about this.


55 posted on 05/30/2008 3:17:43 PM PDT by no dems (90% of Blacks vote for the only Black candidate; isn't that racist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I believe there are about 1.2 million Jews in California, which has an overall population of about 37 million, so it’s roughtly 3% Jewish.


56 posted on 05/30/2008 3:24:09 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Yea, but they ALL vote. And they give money.


57 posted on 05/30/2008 3:26:38 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I wasn’t really disputing you. You’re right on both counts, and we know how close even large-state contests can be. What might be realistic for the swing from their regular pattern—from 80-85% Democratic to maybe, 65-75%, depending on how big a blowout Obama would have to suffer nationally?

That’d be maybe a 15% swing on 4% of the vote? That’s a little over a half (.6) % of the total vote. Not nothing.


58 posted on 05/30/2008 3:37:37 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: no dems
The response sounds typically partisan, not conservative. Not a response that belongs on FR.

What is being suggested, on a daily basis, by a great many folks, both in the trenches and politically connected, is that Republicans dump McCain at the nominating convention, select someone more representative of the party and win in November.

The circumstances in late 2008 are similar to those that prevailed in late 2006 in California. The Democrats have zilch for candidates, a get whitey intellectual and a Clinton, who even Democrats hate. A Republican victory will be easy for even an average Republican with little name recognition. A number of governors and/or congress critters/ will do.

What Republicans don't need are one of the new, neutered Republicans like Romney, Schwarzenegger or McCain.

59 posted on 05/30/2008 5:06:37 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: no dems

BWAAAAHAAHAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAA!!!!!!!!


60 posted on 05/30/2008 5:10:07 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson