Posted on 07/06/2008 6:17:46 AM PDT by DemonDeac
"President Bush on Sunday defended his decision to attend next month's Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing, saying that to boycott "would be an affront to the Chinese people.""
"Speaking to reporters ahead of this week's summit of the Group of Eight industrialized nations in Japan, Bush said he did not need to skip the ceremony to show his position on religious freedom and human rights in China. "
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
So what?
Ya think the Chinese Communist peasants are attending the Olympics? No, of course they're not. The Chicoms will sweep them off the streets, to get out of the way.
so, i agree with the president.
Some of you people would agree with Bush regardless of what he did.
LOL Then a Bush never done nothing for this nation in relation to China. It's all about Corporate Interest.
you don’t like president bush?
Hey, dude! I’m just peachy as always. Looks like we’ve got a few mini-trolls on this thread.
To be honest, I prefer conservatives, strong leadership, a much smaller government, secured borders and policy that puts America first, as opposed to what we have now.
Hope that answers your question.
Only when held in the U.S. A sitting president has never attended a foreign Olympics.
Nobody is talking about boycotting the Olympics. The question is why President Bush should choose these Olympics to be the first sitting president in history to attend a foreign Olympic games. The answer is because he doesn't give a damn how it looks.
Absolutely the right decision. No point in insulting them. Smart, very smart decision.
I'm not sure I give a damn how it looks either. How does it look to you?
It looks like China could invade Taiwan tomorrow and Bush would still be there for the opening ceremonies, smiling like a fool.
Well Bush had his chance to fight with China right after he was elected when they attacked our plane. He chose not to. Good decision? Bad decision? Imagine us embroiled with a shooting war with China when AQ hit us on 9/11. What a different world it might be. Harry Turtledove would have another series of novels for the next 10 years. But regarding China and Taiwan, despite their bluster, I'd be surprised if China were stupid enough to invade Taiwan. All they have to do is wait and Taiwan will probably willingly join them. How things can change in 60 years or so.
I’m not suggesting Bush launch a war with China. What I am questioning is why Bush is dead set on attending the Olympic in Beijing? No sitting U.S. president has ever attended a foreign Olympics, so it’s not like he would be breaking precedent. China has attracted international criticism on human rights, on Tibet, on its actions in Africa. The only thing it cares about right now are the Olympics. What Bush is saying to the world is screw Tibet, screw Africa, screw human rights, I’m going to go to the Olympics anyway with my good buddy Hu Jintao. I think that is a bad decision.
It could be a bad decision and then there could also be plenty going on that we don’t know about. I really don’t think the Olympics needs any more political drama which never seems to accomplish much of anything. I really don’t think Bush is saying to the world “screw Tibet, screw Africa, screw human rights, I’m going to go to the Olympics anyway with my good buddy Hu Jintao” as you’ve said. But heck, maybe he is. He did warn the world about Iraq, Iran and North Korea and nobody listened and in fact condemned him. So if he’s saying screw it on China, I for one don’t blame him at this point. Maybe those who are so outraged about Tibet, Africa and Chinese human rights should get off their butts and do something themselves instead of harping on a president who has 5 months left in a term where he did try to do something about human rights beyond the usual empty rhetoric.
Methinks that's a load of bull...manure. What about the atheletes at Athens back in 2004? Why no special presidential visit to the Olympics for them? Didn't he care about that team?
Personally I think it's because Bush wants to go to the Olympics and he wants to go with all the trappings of President. Period.
Well, George W Bush does. And I appreciate his sensitivity in this matter. He is a great President because of actions like this.
I agree with your perspective. I have met people like yourselves who have taken a political affront at the way South Africa was treated when other rogue nations where much worse (and many of them within the African continent). YET ............ the IRONY, is that many people who have this perspective about S. Africa SHOULD have that same wisdom in regards to China. That despite China's short comings, there are other states far worse. Yet, these people (those who took an affront to the whole Nelson Mandela celebrity status) want to put China in the same political light, that is, to highlight everything negative about China despite the fact that other nations that are far worse. Ironic and perplexing to me.
Troll.
I am not. You only see me that way, because to you, my perspective on many of the issues surrounding China appear provoking. But they are not meant to be, but rather, to give a perspective that is outside the political PARADIGM of the FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.