Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Okay, but what I am wondering , critics claim that there isn’t enough water to do this. Is that inaccurate because of the present technology?


16 posted on 07/23/2008 8:11:17 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: kellynla
Not an engineer, but the Raytheon technique should not be water-intensive at all. How water-intensive is microwave cooking, eh?

Shell's technique involves lining production areas with ice, and recycling much of the water involved. It **sounds** as if there might be a considerable amount of net water usage, but, again, I'm not an engineer.

18 posted on 07/23/2008 8:16:06 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
I found this interesting:

1.2.6 WATER AVAILABILITY
The development of western oil shale resources will require water for plant operations, supporting infrastructure, and the associated economic growth in the region. While some new oil shale technologies significantly reduce process water requirements, stable and secure sources of significant volumes of water may still be required for large-scale oil shale development. The largest demands for water are expected to be for land reclamation and to support the population and economic growth associated with oil shale activity.

Strategic Significance of America’s Oil Shale Resource
Volume II, Oil Shale Resources, Technology and Economics
http://www.unconventionalfuels.org/publications/reports/npr_strategic_significancev2.pdf
Page 6

29 posted on 07/23/2008 8:46:24 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson