Posted on 07/23/2008 7:46:48 AM PDT by kellynla
The Bush administration on Tuesday released proposed rules administering commercial oil shale development on public lands in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming to provide "critical rules of the road" for investors.
The rules would govern lease management and royalty payments should extracting kerogen from rock for further refining into fuel ever prove economically feasible - an open question given the likelihood of carbon taxes, lack of available Colorado River water and a host of environmental protection restrictions.
The rules proposed by the Department of the Interior are part of an election-year push by Republicans to support development of oil shale, which a Rand Corp. study last year said could yield as much as 800 billion barrels of oil.
"As Americans pay more than $4 for a gallon of gasoline and watch energy prices continue to climb higher and higher, we need to be doing more to develop our own energy here at home, through resources such as oil shale," said Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne. "Instead, I find it ironic that we are asking countries halfway around the world to produce more for us."
(Excerpt) Read more at sltrib.com ...
ping
bump
Carbon taxes. The new Nigerian scam.
I’m curious...what’s the process (if any) by which oil shale companies replenish the land after extraction?
There are approximately 3 TRILLION barrels of oil in oil shale reserves, world-wide. Of that 3 TRILLION barrels, the US has at least 62% of proven oil shale reserves, or about 2 TRILLION barrels.
The cost to refine that shale is estimated to stabilize around $50 per barrel.
Why are the democrat/socialists against US energy independance ?
Replenish what? Have you ever seen the WY-UT-CO shale areas? Mostly a moonscape to start with.
It is accomplished by drilling, below ground heating and pumping. The top side is essentially undisturbed.
Raytheon has a similar method using radio frequency technology to release the oil without removing the shale.
Turn it into a big ATV park.
Reference for some trying to stop this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2049339/posts?page=2#2
I've always thought these were lowball numbers, but, notwithstanding, $50 sounds pretty high.
Of course, who's to know what extraneous costs the bozos in goobermint will impose on this production, eh?
There was also reference on Free Republic to another shale oil production that produced water.
There ought to be some sort of mkt for the sterile rock residue, too. Lining rail track, for instance -- this would save railroads from having to use any soil sterilant. Perhaps even pressing the residue shales into some sort of building material, even billiard tables.
This whole deal is nothing but win-win-win for the nation...which, I think, is why the envirokookfanaticdingbats are so adamant about not allowing kerogen from shale to be produced.
Can you use salt water steam?
Okay, but what I am wondering , critics claim that there isn’t enough water to do this. Is that inaccurate because of the present technology?
Shell's technique involves lining production areas with ice, and recycling much of the water involved. It **sounds** as if there might be a considerable amount of net water usage, but, again, I'm not an engineer.
Which is why we should START in WY and UT. Then, when King Ritter of Spendthrift sees all the revenue accruing to those states, he’ll get on board.
“The Unocal commercial demonstration plant project in the Colorado Piceance Creek Basin actually produced more water than it consumed, as former Paraho Corporation head Larry Lukens found from talking with Unocals engineers. Colorado oil shale contains, on average, 2-5% by weight of water. That water is liberated from the rock during the retorting process. Unocal actually had to construct evaporation ponds to get rid of all the excess water generated.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2032240/posts
I would not call the water a non-issue, but an issue that can be addressed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.